Sunday, December 14, 2008

The Obama Birth

Many have been blogging about the Obamessiah's place of birth and his birth certificate. Unfortunately many have commented but don't have any knowledge of the law or how birth certificates are created and used.

First, the birth certificate presented by the Obama campaign is a genuine document. However, it is not a birth certificate, despite the State of Hawaii claiming it is. It is, in fact, an abstract of certificate of live birth. An abstract is, according to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, 1: a summary of points (as of a writing) usually presented in skeletal form ; also : something that summarizes or concentrates the essentials of a larger thing or several things". In the case of abstracts of live births, it is a summary of the information on a birth certificate. For the Obamessiah it summarises the information on the birth certificate.

However, it does not give all the information which would be on a complete birth certificate. The problem is that Hawaii issues birth certificates for persons born outside of Hawaii to parents who lived one year previous to the birth in Hawaii. http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol06_ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.HTM

And so we cut to the chase. In my profession I routinely confront people with facts that put themselves in peril. Routinely those persons can present information to me to clear themselves of that peril. Usually those persons want to present that evidence. However, many routinely claim there is such exculpatory evidence, but they refuse to present that evidence. And so we come to the Obamessiah, who can prove that this is all barking up the wrong tree, but he still refuses to present the proof that will end it all.

Why? Why is he refusing to end this story? Probably for the same reason he has yet to release the records showing the contact between Advisors A and B of his staff and Governor Blogavich. Because any release will show he is both a crook and a liar.

Where is David Frost when you need him?

4 comments:

Ted said...

SCOTUS has now prevented itself from acknowleding the question whether Obama is or is not a “natural born citizen” (as distinguished from “citizen”) three times and counting: First before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors. Other cases on the same question are at, or are heading to, SCOTUS. Whether SCOTUS ultimately decides if Obama is or is not a “natural born citizen” only after the Electors vote, only after Congress acts on the Electors’ vote, prior to Obama’s inauguration, or only after Obama’s inauguration, SCOTUS will have to decide — or the people and/or the military will. The issue no longer is Obama. The issue is SCOTUS.

Cris Ericson said...

I was looking for the Wrotnowski docket number at the Supreme Court of the U.S. website,

then I looked for an old docket number of mine and it was gone,

my name did not show up in search, nor the civil corporate defendant's name.

The litigation involved PETN, Lead Azide and Lead Styphnate.
You KNOW what those are, right???

U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy's campaign donations on the FEC website showed that he had taken donations from Dewey Ballantine PAC who had taken them from Dewey Ballantine Law firm attorneys, Stuart Hirshfield and Wayne Cross,
DURING THE LITIGATION, AND who were my opposing attorneys during the litigation.

This litigation was prior to Sept. 11, 2001. The Supreme Court of the U.S. denied my three petitions.

Isn't our government fascinating?

Cris Ericson

Cris Ericson said...

and if you have half a brain
you'll just keep that
comment to yourself
and think a lot about it,
I need a brilliant attorney
to get the case re-opened.

Federale said...

Well, I am doing fine with half a brain, but my interpretation of the Immigration and Nationality Act stand, as well as my observations concerning birth certificate fraud.