Tuesday, December 30, 2008

The First Refuge Of The Scoundrel

Or, more accurately, the racist. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/illinois_governor_senate Racist black politicians like Representative Bobby Rushhave decried the Democrats refusal to seat the corrupt black former Attorney General Roland Burris appointed by the corrupt racist affirmative action supporter Governor of Illinois, Rod Blagojevich. As Gomer Pyle says, surprise, surprise, surprise. Just as the race mongers of both parties have go proverbially ape-s**t over Barak The Magic Negro parody, they have gone ballistic because they thought that particular Senate seat was by right of birth belonging to a black man. Never mind that the appointee was a Blago toady and big time donor, never mind that he thought that white people have fewer rights than black people, never mind that Blago was going to sell it to another black man, Jesse "Hymie Town" Jackson, Jr, the man who was given beer distributorships only because he was black. This is the party that legitimized Reverend Al Sharpton, the drug dealer and murder and Reverend Jerimiah Wright, the racist preacher to Baraka Hussein Obama, and the original racist preacher of them all, Reverend Jesse Jackson, Sr. The man who extorts money on a routine basis from so many corporations. And what does John McCain have to say about all this? Nothing, except to support affirmative action.

Monday, December 29, 2008

Have They Forgotten Already

Many commentators are talking about a 9/10 mindset. Well, it appears that George Bush has got the 9/10 mindset. It appears that he and his ambassador to the land of jihadi funders, Ford Franker, think that the biggest problem in Saudi-American relations is not letting enough jihadis into America. http://www.ilw.com/articles/2008,1230-schwartz.shtm And, of course, the commies at the immigration bar agree wholeheartedly. Was it just seven years ago that 14 or so Saudis on student visas killed 3,000 Americans. Well, that doesn't matter to Jorge or Schwartz. I guess 3,000 dead Americans is just the cost of business contracts or some revenue to flight schools in the U.S. I just hope and pray that Schwartz, Ford, and Bush have a relative or two killed in the next 9/11. Shame on you, shame, shame, shame.

Friday, December 26, 2008

Long Hot Winter, But Not Because Of Global Warming

It is a hot winter in Sweden. The religion of swirled peas is doing what blacks did for Detroit in '67, in LA twice, etc, buring down everything in sight. http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2008/12/rosengrd-is-not-unique.html#readfurther As Muslim immigration increases how soon until we get a similar taste of the joys of Muslim immigrants?

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

States Can Arrest Wetbacks

In a double whammy, Second Amendment scholar David Kopel provides the proof that States can enforce Federal law without enabling legislation. Their authority is inherent as a sovereign entity. Great news, but it gets better. the case law is from scholarship that shows that there are no restrictions on American citizens owning any type of firearm, so long as they are not convicted of a crime, mentally ill, or a vagrant. Huzzahs for Kopel. http://davekopel.org/2A/LawRev/19thcentury.htm

Here is the money quote:

Clause 16 gives Congress the power "To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the Unit d States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress."(70) Houston's lawyer reasoned that the Congressional power over the national militia is plenary and, therefore, states could not legislate on the subject.

Pennsylvania's lawyers responded that Congressional power over the militia was concurrent with state power, not exclusive. They pointed to the Tenth Amendment, which reserves to states all powers not granted to the federal government.(71) Further, they said, the Pennsylvania statute punishing militia resisters was consistent with the similar federal statute punishing resisters.(72)

The Supreme Court's opinion was delivered by Justice Bushrod Washington, a nephew of George Washington. Justice Washington concluded that, as a general principle, federal legislation regarding the militia was exclusive. Since Congress had enacted a law punishing militia resisters, the states could not enact their own laws about militia resisters.(73)

But, continued Justice Washington, the instant case was different. Here, the question was whether a Pennsylvania court-martial could enforce the federal law. Yes, answered Justice Washington, since the Congressional law creating federal court-martials for militia resisters did not forbid states from enforcing the federal law. And the Pennsylvania statute did not create a new law, but merely enforced the federal one.(74) Thus, the Pennsylvania conviction was upheld.(75)

There we have it: The States and their political subdivisions, your local PD and Sherrif's Office, a la Sherrif Joe Arpaio, can arrest all the illegals they can and they have to leave law abiding Americans alone with their guns, including automatic weapons and assault rifles. Take that Obamessiah.

Our Coming Overlords

An excellent book review and observations on the radical transformation of Britian and the West into outposts of radical Islam. http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/6019 To think that liberals used to sue to stop censorship, they even accused Sarah Palin of censorship, in a disapproving way, but they have submitted themselves to the censorship, much less the execution of female adulterers and all homosexuals, of radical Islam. Wow, the new patriarchy, alot worse than the old patriarchy, brought to you by liberals. Thanks alot boys and girls.

Is Hugh Hewitt Really A Conservative

Talk show host Hugh Hewitt, usually one of the talk show circuits best interviewers, or at least has the best guests, like Mark Stein and some great reporters on the war issue, appears to be going soft. Also, usually tough on the culture war issues, and a defender of Christianity, he appears to be succumbing to political correctness on the homosexual issue. He recently had his fellow Chapman University Law School colleague Katherine Darmer, a radical homosexual activist. During the broadcast, the two repeatedly referred to each other as friends, but a little farther into the show, which was a debate between Darmer and Austin Nimocks, a supporter of Proposition 8, she said that all who supported Proposition 8 were homophobes, directing it against Nimocks. And Hewitt just let that slide. He did not challenge her. No wonder the left is winning, if talk radio hosts like Hewitt won't stand up to homosexual thugs like Darmer, we are lost. Half of winning is standing up to thugs. Hewitt even let the issue of homosexual terrorism slide with only a slight reference, not holding Darmer's feet to the fire and again letting her radicalism slide with no challenge.

Like Hewitt's support for amnesty and his multiple failures, especially for an attorney, on the nomination of Clinton to the Secretary of State position that is clearly prohibited by the Constitution and the issue of Obama's place of birth. His response to that issue was the State of Hawaii has "certified" Obama's as yet unreleased original birth certificate. Well, since the State of Hawaii issues birth certificates to person's not born in Hawaii, how does the State of Hawaii's "certification" of the birth certificate close the issue of Obama's birth overseas?

One would think an attorney would be a little more discerning. But, then his colleague Michael Medved is on an ant-Rush crusade and a fanatic on giving amnesty to the next generation of radical leftwing voting Hispanics, who voted over 60% against the Republican who supported amnesty. Oh, and by the way, lost the election. I am wondering as to what Hewitt really is. And who Medved really is.

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Welfare Queens And Mortgage Cheats

It has started. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28300438?GT1=43001#storyContinued You knew the lazy obese welfare recipients who are constantly on the news around Christmas complaining about how little food they have and their children don't have winter coats are always complaining about the situation they created for themselves. But now we have the fat, lazy mortgage cheats who go to the press to claim they are starving because they are paying their mortgage. From this story you see that the borrower hasn't missed any meals and she could actually push herself away from the table and it will help her. I wonder if the moronic reporter noticed that the starving woman was morbidly obese? Just how stupid are the Democrats that work at MSNBC? Or how stupid do they think we are? At least not put a photo of her in the story. Then we could at least think that she was starving, but what we see is a fatso. It is just like the welfare cheats on the east coast that claimed they could not afford health insurance for their children, but they could afford to buy a home and a luxury SUV. The MSM has such an agenda. And we are the victims.

Who Says Liberals Aren't Hypocrites, Part Infinity

The left is at it again. The allegedly non-politically motivated National Public Radio is in full denial mode over the sponsorship of NPR programs by the Department of Homeland Security and their E-Verify program to keep illegals from working. This has so many issues to cover it boggles the mind. http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/spots_92963___article.html/radio_met.html

First, why is the government subsidizing the already government subsidized, and unconstitutional, taxpayer funded NPR. Why is one government agency wasting taxpayer dollars on a program already a black hole of taxpayer monies? It makes no sense.

But, of course, the real issue is that NPR's listeners complained that DHS was sponsoring something on NPR, not that some other agency was sponsoring something on NPR. You know they were not complaining when it is an agency who's mission they agree with. NPR of course went through all the contortions that liberals enjoy, self-absement, foolish statements about how inaccurate E-verify is, which is a lie, as E-Verify is 99.9% accurate. Liberals were just shocked that NPR would do something racist, because enforcing the laws of the U.S. are racist.

Now liberals claim NPR isn't political, but it is all about leftwing politics and it was pointed out that NPR is rife with pro-illegal propoganda and it was apparently disconcerting for a liberal to hear anything he disagrees with, but liberals then claim that NPR just speaks truth to power and makes its decisions in a neutral manner. Then the became even more upset when NPR continued the ads, with NPR saying that their corporate decisions are separte from their editorial decisions. But, wait, so they admit that their editorial decisions are blatantly leftist and pro-illegal? No getting around that. Liberals apparently want neutrality of decision making, but not any decisions that violate the principle of supporting illegal immigration.

It gets even worse. Liberals are always saying they want to punish the employers who exploit illegals. Well, that is what E-Verify does, it keeps employers from hiring illegals. Liberals are such hypocrites.

Even worse though, apparently a Catholic Bishop, who's diocese owns an NPR station also complained, saying that more immigrants should be allowed to come to the U.S. to work legally. Well, Bishop, first, NPR is a radical supporter of abortion and homosexuality. Why are you supporting abortion propoganda and the homosexual lifestyle? But, more to the point, what does increasing immigration have to do with stopping illegal employment, which causes declines in wages for legal workers? In any event, amnesty and an increase in legal immigration, have nothing to do with E-Verify, which only verifys a legal right to work in the U.S. Giving more people the right to work in the U.S. is a separate issue.

Thus, liberals are hypocrites. I am sure if the Civil Rights Division or the EEOC had an ad on NPR there would be no complaints. Liberals just don't want some laws enforced, which makes them enemies of a Republican form of government and of Democracy as well. You can't pick and chose the laws you enforce. It is called a dictatorship and the politization of the law if the laws are subject to political interference.

Oh, and by the way, Merry Fitzmas. He is coming for the Obamessiah. Take that on the rule of law you liberals complained about when you thought Bush was avoiding prosecution for war crimes.

Monday, December 22, 2008

Who Questions The Loyalty Of All Muslims

Convicted: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081222/ap_on_re_us/fort_dix_plot A mixed lot of Muslims, from moderate countries like Jordan, Albania, and Turkey, some given refugee status, were convicted of conspiring to kill American soldiers. The worst thing is that so-called moderate Muslim leaders said they were innocent, claiming that they were just "joking" about waging war on America. Well, these so-called moderate Muslims just exposed themselves as Jihadis. We must learn this lesson: All Muslims are the enemy. There is no such thing as moderate Muslims. All are dedicated to Jihad and killing Christian Americans. War has been declared on us; we must fight back.

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Queer Gangraped By Minorities

We got another liberal commie, this time a member of the queer community, gangraped by blacks and Hispanics. http://www.kron4.com/Global/story.asp?S=9556630 Aside from the family values south of the Rio Grande, what does this tell us? Jesse Jackson, the man willing to pay a million dollars to have his son, Jessie Jackson, Jr., appointed Senator from Illinois, says that blacks cannot commit hate crimes, but the pathetic Richmond Police Department, an agency that specializes in not investigating crime by black people and illegal aliens, says it is a hate crime. So, what gives? How can the RPD investigate a crime that cannot be committed by minorities? Inquiring minds want to know. Is rape just another criminal offense designed to keep the black man down, just like drug crimes? And, pray tell, why are so many blacks and Hispanics drug dealers and rapists? More inquiring minds want to know.

Friday, December 19, 2008

Brittania, Who No Longer Rules The Waves, Much Less The Streets of Manchester

See for yourselves, http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=72c_1229720591, the British, or should I say English police, no longer rule their own streets, much less the oceans. The police there are unarmed and cowardly, frightened by knife wielding thugs. In the U.S. those scum would have been shot down like the dogs they are. The Second Amendment is all that separates us from barbarism. Let's see what happens Inauguration Night. I have plenty of ammo stored up for the coming riots. To think that Blackstone believed that bearing arms was one of the rights of Englishmen. Well, thanks to the Roundheads and their successors, the English are unarmed, deracinated, and eviscerated. So the sun has set and they go quietly to their doom, dominated by thugs and Wahhabis. Such is the wheel of history. Perhaps is England had followed Charles I instead of Cromwell.

Monday, December 15, 2008

Muslims and Homosexuals

Well, Emirates Airline, the official airline of radical Islam is now flying to San Francisco. While I thought that cities had no control over who flys to a particular airport, it appears that Emirates is in violation of various San Francisco city ordinances on the treatment of homosexuals and on other aspects of promiscuity. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/12/15/BAAR14N9PM.DTL But, it appears that that queen of the lispers, Tom Ammiano, local puff politician, says it is too bad that the city can do nothing about the Emirates poicies because the Muslims are a bit backward. Contrast this with the jihad the homosexuals are conducting against Mormons.

More interestingly, the City of San Francisco said it could not enforce its laws outside the United States. Well, I thought the city could not enforce its laws outside of San Franicsco. How, pray tell, does San Francsico regulate benefits provided to employees of companies who operate outside of San Francisco? How does it prohibit airlines it does not like from landing in San Francisco?

More to the point, why are the homosexuals so accepting of the execution of homosexuals in the Emirates, Iran, and Saudi Arabia? I guess they don't really care about oppression, so long is is done by someone with dark skin and not a Christian.

All just part of imposing the homosexual agenda throughout the U.S. I wonder if some city outlawed benefits for domestic partners and applied that to every company operating in that city? I bet the homosexuals and their liberal friends would suddenly discover federalism.

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Crisis Welfare Spending

The new law school at the University of California Irvine has decided to give all its new students free tuition for the next three years. http://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2008/10/uc-irvine-law-school-to-offer-three-years-of-full-tuition-to-the-entering-class.html

Aside from the fact that this is a 14th Amendment violation, as other law schools in the UC system will not do that, much less all the other schools in the UC, the State of California has a massive budget deficit of over $40 billion. So, during this time of crisis, the welfare queen Irwin Chemerinsky, Dean of the law school, thinks this will attract good students. Well, maybe the laziest students; those who don't want to hold a paying job, only an intership with a communist community organizing special interest group that would force taxpayers to pay even more to welfare queens of this state.

How about we start with budget cuts with UC law schools. Close them, or, better yet, have the students pay the full cost of their education. Maybe then we can cut our high income tax rate and attract businesses, instead of training welfare queens to sue them.

The Obama Birth

Many have been blogging about the Obamessiah's place of birth and his birth certificate. Unfortunately many have commented but don't have any knowledge of the law or how birth certificates are created and used.

First, the birth certificate presented by the Obama campaign is a genuine document. However, it is not a birth certificate, despite the State of Hawaii claiming it is. It is, in fact, an abstract of certificate of live birth. An abstract is, according to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, 1: a summary of points (as of a writing) usually presented in skeletal form ; also : something that summarizes or concentrates the essentials of a larger thing or several things". In the case of abstracts of live births, it is a summary of the information on a birth certificate. For the Obamessiah it summarises the information on the birth certificate.

However, it does not give all the information which would be on a complete birth certificate. The problem is that Hawaii issues birth certificates for persons born outside of Hawaii to parents who lived one year previous to the birth in Hawaii. http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol06_ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.HTM

And so we cut to the chase. In my profession I routinely confront people with facts that put themselves in peril. Routinely those persons can present information to me to clear themselves of that peril. Usually those persons want to present that evidence. However, many routinely claim there is such exculpatory evidence, but they refuse to present that evidence. And so we come to the Obamessiah, who can prove that this is all barking up the wrong tree, but he still refuses to present the proof that will end it all.

Why? Why is he refusing to end this story? Probably for the same reason he has yet to release the records showing the contact between Advisors A and B of his staff and Governor Blogavich. Because any release will show he is both a crook and a liar.

Where is David Frost when you need him?

Constitutional Standing

Well, a federal judge has violated the constitutional separation of powers between the federal government and the sovereign states that make up this Union. http://www.abpnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3710&Itemid=53 The interesting aspect of this case is that no person was able to establish standing to bring the suit. Even more interesting is that the Supreme Court has just rejected suits regarding the birth abroad of Baraka Hussein Obama. The justices claimed that no one has standing to enforce a provision of the Constitution. In constitutional law, you cannot bring an action unless you have standing, e.g. you have been harmed by a government action. While it is clear that the Constitution will be violated by Baraka Hussein Obama's taking the Oath of Office as President, it is not so clear that there is any violation of the Constitution by a license plate in South Carolina having a cross on it. Just havign a cross on the license plate is not establishing a church, which is what the First Amendment prohibits, e.g. no litigant and their proxy, the ACLU, has identified the particular church that is being established by having a cross on a license plate. There is no denonimation identified, so no church has been established. Not the Baptists, not the Methodists, not the Catholics, etc. I, personally, am offended by the nature worshipers who have whales on their license plates in California, but there is no establishment of the pagan nature worship religion. However, just as Hillary Clinton is prohibited by the Constitution from serving as Secretary of State, so Baraka Hussein Obama, born in Kenya, is unqualified to serve as President.