Baraka Hussein Obama's first act as president was to give aid and comfort to terrorists. http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/864401.html Imagine if President Dwight D. Eisenhower's first act as president was to suspend trials of Nazis? Well, the Democrats would have gone ballistic, just as they did when Senator Robert Taft exposed the Nuremberg Trials as unlawful and unconstitutional. And the funny thing is that Baraka Hussein Obama stated that the Nuremburg Trials were within the confines of American law. But Obama and Eric Holder claim that the trials in Gitmo are unconstitutional. And what is the difference between the two? The difference is that Communists ran the Nuremburg Trials, one of Stalin's show trial prosecutors, Andrey Januaryevich Vyshinskiy. So, just what does Baraka Hussein Obama think is wrong with the Gitmo trials? They have free lawyers in Gitmo, three attorneys sit as the tribunal, and they can cross examine witnesses. At Nuremburg there were three judges and Vyshinskiy and there was no free American attorney for the defense. More importantly at Nuremburg Trials there were lawful combatants on trial and those with immunity as political leaders. Also, Nuremburg Trials included a newspaper publisher as a defendant, Julius Streiker. So, there is the rub as the poet says, Obama supports trials conducted by Soviet prosecutors directed against lawful combatants and publisher's of newspapers that he disagrees with.
Now, many will say that I am defending Nazis and they just deserved it. Well, so does Khalid Sheik Muhammed and the rest of the Gitmo terrorists. The big difference is that Baraka Hussein Obama sympathizes with radical Islam and wants to protect it. Baraka Hussein Obama has no trouble executing white people, many Christians, like Generals Alfred Jodl and Wilhelm Keitel, or trying to execute Admiral Karl Donitz. The big difference is that those men were soldiers who fought under the rules of war while Baraka Hussein Obama's allies in the war on the West are terrorists who are not lawful combatants.
So, what will Baraka Hussein Obama do? Well, the plan is obvious. He will bring the terrorists to the United States. Most will slowly be released with the excuse that there is insufficient evidence that can legally be presented in a criminal trial and those will be released.
The big boys will be put on trial, regardless of the admissible evidence, with the intent that a liberal judge will release the terrorists. Obama then can blame a judge and deflect the political consequences.
The next step will be the big one. Once the terrorists are released, where will they go. No one will accept them. They cannot be deported to their home countries because they will be tortured or executed. So, where will they end up.
They will end up here. The first thing they do will claim asylum and there will be nothing that we can do about it. There will no country that will accept them for deportation; and they can only be deported to their country of citizenship or last habitual residence. Remember how liberals complained about rendition and deporation of terrorists to countries that practiced torture? They said it was illegal. Well, they cannot now deport these terrorists to Saudi Arabia or Egypt where torture is practiced.
Khalid Sheik Mohammed is from Balochistan Province of Pakistan and Pakistan will not allow him to return. Ramzi Binalshibh is Yemeni and will not be accepted back. There is no other option than release in the U.S. More importantly, according to the Supreme Court, they cannot be held without charges if there is no chance of deportation.
So, Baraka Hussein Obama's endgame is to have the terrorists released into the U.S. So, the punishment for 9/11 will be a green card for Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his co-conspirators.