Thursday, May 31, 2012

Deportations Of Criminal Aliens Down

The Obama Regime is extending its Administrative Amnesty as predicted to criminal aliens.  Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 removals of criminal aliens are down 9% compared to FY 2011.  (h/t NumbersUSA)

Los Angeles Times May 26, 2012 by Brian Bennett

Obama administration officials say they forcibly removed a record number of people last year, some 396,906 in all, including 216,698 criminal immigrants, or about 55% of the total.

ICE has removed 127,044 criminal illegal immigrants this fiscal year, officials said. That is behind last year's rate by approximately 12,000, or 9%.
As usual, ICE insider Chris Crane exposes the behinds the scenes desparation in the Regime over the declining numbers:

Some ICE agents condemned the latest plan as politically inspired, rather than a more efficient use of resources.

"Our officers in the field are being told by senior-level managers that this is politically motivated to bump up the numbers during an election year for the Obama administration," said Chris Crane, president of the National ICE Council, a union that represents approximately 7,300 ICE employees.

"During this administration, every year we are restricted from doing our jobs during the year and then at the end of the fiscal year we have to pull some kind of stunt to pull our numbers back up," said Crane.
The Regime just wants it both ways, a record number of deported criminal aliens, but it also extends the same amnesty to criminal aliens available to run-of-the-mill illegal aliens.  But it appears that criminal aliens are winning that half-hearted battle.

Department Of Agriculture Opposes Immigration Law Enforcement

The Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Joe Leonard, Jr., not of the Justice Department, but of the Department of Agriculture (USDA), has determined that the USDA is officially against the enforcement of the nation's laws against illegal immigration.  Specifically, the USDA will have nothing to do with and opposes various Acts of Congress expressed in Title 8 of the United States Code.  And furthermore, USDA law enforcement personnel will be disiplined for cooperating with the United States Border Patrol (USBP) and prohibited from requesting assistance from the USBP when USDA law enforcement officers need assistance, back-up, and Spanish language translation during interviews of persons lawfully detained by USDA law enforcement officers investigating other violations of Federal law.

NYT May 30, 2012 by William Yardley

Washington: Ruling Against Border Patrol Backup

The practice of Forest Service officers’ requesting language interpretation and security backup from Border Patrol agents during stops of Spanish-speaking people is discriminatory, according to a federal administrative ruling made public this week. The ruling, by Joe Leonard Jr., the assistant secretary for civil rights of the Department of Agriculture, said requesting interpretation assistance was “merely an excuse to target Latino individuals for immigration enforcement.” The ruling came in response to a claim by the companion of a Mexican man who drowned in a river on the Olympic Peninsula of Washington last year after a Border Patrol officer, summoned by a Forest Service officer, chased the man into the woods. The couple had been stopped on national forestland while picking salal, an evergreen shrub used in floral arrangements. The ruling included disciplinary actions against some employees, and it ordered the Forest Service to create new guidelines for dealing with people who speak limited English.

So, now it is a violation of an alien's civil rights for a law enforcement officer from one Federal agency to call for the assistance of the USBP?  Apparently USDA law enforcement officers are supposed to ignore certain Federal laws but enforce other Federal laws.  Of course the USDA is also involved in ignoring other Federal laws, such as defrauding the government through its support for the false claims submitted in the Pigford cases and their successor false claims.

Give Joe Leonard, Jr. a call:

1400 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20250, Mail Stop 0115
Phone: (202) 720-3808
FAX: (202) 690-1782

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

CHOAM Redirects Border Patrol Agents

Combine Honnete Ober Advancer Mercantiles in this case being our own Big Business outsourcers who offshore their manufacturing to Mexico, and China as well, which is trying to bypass expensive U.S. ports like Long Beach and Oakland by exporting to the U.S. through Mexico's Pacific ports.  The U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) has been directed to develop a new enforcement strategy and redeploy Border Patrol Agents (BPAs) from their duties on the U.S. border to Ports-of-Entry (POEs) to assist the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office of Field Operations (OFO) with low staffing levels at the POEs.  POEs are the places where persons and goods enter the United States.  POEs on the land borders are chronically understaffed with commercial importers and border crossers backed up for hours waiting to cross

Tucson Sentinal May 30, 2012 by Mariana Dale, Richard Schaefer, Carolina Cruz and Holly Ocasio Rizzo

EL PASO – Border Patrol agents might soon switch from sitting in trucks along the U.S.-Mexico border to helping traffic move more efficiently on the international bridges in this Texas city.

This scenario comes from the idea of Border Patrol agents collaborating with other government agencies.

Border Patrol Chief Michael Fisher in May announced a strategy to fight transnational crimes and drugs, support Homeland Security efforts and aid U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

One possible outcome might be reassigning Border Patrol agents to Customs border crossings to reduce the long wait.

"Currently Customs and Border Protection needs all of the staffing help that they can get – in particular at our ports of entry," said El Paso City Representative Steve Ortega in an email.
The article hints at the problem, fewer illegal aliens seeking to cross the border without inspection, but also suggests that the illegal alien problem has not gone away.

Currently, Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel in the El Paso area of responsibility are apprehending and removing more undocumented people through the Secure Communities Program, employment raids and by catching crossers at major ports of entry than the Border Patrol, according to Border Patrol and ICE enforcement and removal figures.

That is why the Border Patrol 2012-2016 Strategic Plan calls for redirecting its agents' efforts toward relieving congestion and waits at the ports of entry, as well as combating terrorism and transnational crime.
ICE success in worksite enforcement and with Secure Communities only tells us though that there are too many illegal aliens living in the United States.  Similarly it tells us while CBP OFO might be admitting aliens who overstay their visas, the real problem is the 11-20 million illegal aliens in the United States and a lack of an aggressive and effective interior enforcement policy.  And there is no evidence that assigning BPAs to POEs will help much with that problem.  What the article does not tell us is that the USBP's new strategy should be a shift from border enforcement to interior enforcement. 

While the problem at the POEs is real, that can and should be solved by adequate staffing funded by a user fee on land border crossings just as POEs at airports are funded by a user fee on airline tickets and air cargo.  A fully staffed OFO would solve the border wait time problem and increase enforcement there, assisting in ending the overstay problem.  But the USBP's new strategy should be one of shifting to interior enforcement; a responsibility it had for years until interior USBP stations were closed by Jorge Bush.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Radical Left Confirms Railroading Of George Zimmerman

The left-wing blog has confirmed that the conclusion of this blog that the Florida Division of Law Enforcement investigation of the Trayvon Martin shooting has been a farce from the start.  (h/t The Volokh Conspiracy)

In a review of the publicly released evidence a leftist lawyer has concluded that Zimmerman will prevail either with Stand Your Ground or with a standard self-defense defense.

Talk Left May 27, 2012
George Zimmerman: The Most Likely Scenario
The investigation by FDLE [Florida Department of Law Enforcement. ed.] and the state's attorney's office was more cursory than that of the Sanford Police. On March 19, they tell Zimmerman's father haven’t made any conclusions and "It’s a mess." They start looking for anything to refute Zimmerman. They try W-3 who still thinks the person on top had a white t-shirt, even though she says she knows she's confused because neither had a white t-shirt on. She's no help to them.
They obviously (and for good reason) discount the roommates who saw and heard no struggle, just a cry for help and a shot and went from "Selma, is it a black guy who got shot?" and "There's a black guy standing over him" on the 911 call to making press conferences with Team Crump and going on TV repeatedly insisting they both saw everything from the moment of the shot, it was the boy crying out for help and this wasn't self defense.
Knowing there was no evidence to refute Zimmerman, the state investigators and prosecutors began concentrating on motive. Prosecutor de la Rionda interviews W-13, only interested in hearing him say Zimmerman acted like it was no big deal when he asked W-13 to call his wife and tell her he shot someone.
De la Rionda's only question for W-6, John, is whether he heard a loud punching sound when he observed Trayvon on top of Zimmerman. Is he going to argue there's no evidence Trayvon was still beating Zimmerman when Zimmerman shot him, and therefore his fear of serious bodily injury should have subsided and was no longer reasonable?

Clearly both Angela Cory and the FDLE pseudo-investigators have reached a conclusion and are desparately searching for the evidence to support their conclusion.  Verdict first, investigation to follow.  It looks like the FDLE is nothing more than a bunch of Chekists.

Read the whole article, Talk Left also comes to the same conclusion of The Wagist:  Trayvon stalked and attacked Zimmerman.

Friday, May 25, 2012

Man Bites Dog

Sort of.  The United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division (DOJ CRD) announced a lawsuit against an Indian job shop, Whiz International LLC, not for discriminating against Americans, but for retaliating an employee who objected to the discrimination.  (h/t Stein Report)

DOJ CRD Press Release May 22, 2012
Justice Department Files Lawsuit Against New Jersey Information Technology Company for Retaliation
The Justice Department filed a lawsuit today against Whiz International LLC, an information technology staffing company in Jersey City, N.J., regarding allegations that the company violated the anti-discrimination provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) when it terminated an employee in retaliation for expressing opposition to Whiz’s alleged preference for foreign nationals with temporary work visas.
The complaint alleges that the company directed an employee that served as a receptionist and a recruiter, to prefer certain noncitizens in its recruitment efforts and then terminated the employee when she expressed discomfort with excluding U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents from consideration. The anti-discrimination provision prohibits employers from retaliating against workers who oppose a practice that is illegal under the statute or who attempt to assert rights under the statute.

Employers cannot punish employees who try to do the right thing and take reasonable measures to shed light on a practice they believe may be discriminatory,” said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. “Employers must ensure that their practices conform to the anti-discrimination provision of the INA, and retaliation will not be tolerated.”

It is clear that the objection of the DOJ CRD is not to the underlying discrimination, but the retaliation.  It is sending a message to employers that discrimination is tolerated, just don't get caught retaliating against an employee who objects to national origin discrimination, at least if the discrimination is directed against American tech workers, who are predominately white.  It is certain that the job shop industry has heard this a go-ahead to ethnically cleanse their workforce.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

More Voting By Aliens

And the hard work of exposing this crime is being done by the private sector, not U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE).  (h/t Election Law Center)  The Voter Integrity Project (VIP) is on the case and found over 500 persons who claimed when called to jury duty to be aliens have voted.

VIP Media Center May 15, 2012

Tuesday, May 15 at 9 AM, at the Wake County Board of Elections, Voter Integrity Project of NC (VIP-NC), a Raleigh-based grass roots organization, is challenging 553 Wake County registered voters who were excused from jury duty in the Wake County Court system by stating that they were not US citizens.

“It looks like about half of these self-confessed non-citizens actually voted at least once since 2008,” said Jay DeLancy, VIP-NC Executive Director, “and might be guilty of a felony in North Carolina.”

Of course, not all will be aliens, some, like John "Silky Pony" Edwards' daughter, Cate Edwards, used the alien line to get out of jury duty.  But the problem of alien voting remains.

Alien voters in Florida are now going to be discovered now that the Florida Department of Law Enforcement will run the suspected names against a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services database, presumably the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) Program.  ICE, however, remains uninterested in arresting and prosecuting these alien voters.

Palm Beach Post  May 17, 2012
Florida Non-Citizen Voter List Will Be Vetted Against Homeland Security Database
TALLAHASSEE — State highway officials soon will begin vetting a list of 180,000 potential non-citizens who are registered to vote against a U.S. Department of Homeland Security database, The Palm Beach Post has learned.
This could resolve a sticking point between the state Division of Elections and elections supervisors for the state's 67 counties over the state's demand that supervisors start removing some of the names from their voter rolls.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Threats From Black Thugs Or Coercion From Law Enforcement

There are only two explanations for the sudden changes in witness statements in the George Zimmerman persecution.  It appears that several witnesses have had sudden changes in what they observed that fateful night in Florida.

Orlando Sentinal May 22, 2012 by Rene Stutzman and Jeff Weiner

Evidence released last week in the second-degree-murder case against George Zimmerman shows four key witnesses made major changes in what they say they saw and heard the night he fatally shot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in Sanford.

Witness 6, presumably "John" went from Trayvon was pounding on Zimmerman to maybe Trayvon was just holding him down.
This witness lived a few feet from where Trayvon and Zimmerman had their fight. On the night of the shooting, he told Serino he saw a black man on top of a lighter-skinned man "just throwing down blows on the guy, MMA-style," a reference to mixed martial arts.

He also said the one calling for help was "the one being beat up," a reference to Zimmerman.

But three weeks later, when he was interviewed by an FDLE agent, the man said he was no longer sure which one called for help.

"I truly can't tell who, after thinking about it, was yelling for help just because it was so dark out on that sidewalk," he said.

He also said he was no longer sure Trayvon was throwing punches. The teenager may have simply been keeping Zimmerman pinned to the ground, he said.

He did not equivocate, though, about who was on top.

"The black guy was on top," he said.
Now it is impossible to mistake holding someone down with someone raining blows on another person in MMA style.  That is just not credible.

Then we have Witness 2 who changed her story from seeing two running figures 10 feet apart to one running figure.

A young woman who lives in the Retreat at Twin Lakes community, where Trayvon was shot, was interviewed twice by Sanford police and once by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.

She told authorities that she had taken out her contact lenses just before the incident. In her first recorded interview with Sanford police four days after the shooting, she told lead Investigator Chris Serino, "I saw two guys running. Couldn't tell you who was in front, who was behind."

She stepped away from her window, and when she looked again, she "saw a fistfight. Just fists. I don't know who was hitting who."

A week later, she added a detail when talking again to Serino: During the chase, the two figures had been 10 feet apart.

That all changed when she was reinterviewed March 20 by an FDLE agent. That time, she recalled catching a glimpse of just one running figure, she told FDLE Investigator John Batchelor, and she heard the person more than saw him.

Not only does she tell the story of two running people once, she tells it twice, but on the third telling the second figure disappears entirely.

And in all of the statements, the only consistant fact was that the change in story was obtained during questioning by Florida Department of Law Enforcement officers under the direction of the prosecutor, Angela Cory and after threats of rioting and killing by the New Black Panthers Party (NBPP). 

While their statements are on video, cold witness statements are not done on video; witnesses are first interviewed to get the story, then they are re-interviewed on camera.  There was plenty of time for the FDLE officers to get the witnesses to change their story.

What is obviously not on the Orlando Sentinal story or the videos is the necessary explanation of why the witnesses changed their story.  Probably because there is no explanation for going from pounding on someone MMA style to holding them down.  Their ain't any explanation for that other than witness tampering.

In any event, an ethical investigator or prosecutor would immediately dismiss all the witnesses who changed their statements in any significant manner.  They have just announced to the world that their statements are unreliable and that they either lied initially or are currently lying.  They either lied to the Sanford Police Department or to the FDLE.  There is no getting around this.  This case should never have been brought and it should now be dropped for the most immediate reason, the witnesses are unreliable and may have already committed the crimes of perjury and obstruction of justice.

That brings us to the reason why these witnesses changed their stories.  Are they doing it because of unethical and illegal behavior of the FDLE officers?  Such illegal and unethical behavior is not beyond law enforcement, just ask the detectives from the Durham Police Department who accepted repeated lies from Crystal Magnum, the prostitute who lied about being raped by the Duke Lacross players.  She repeatedly changed her story about the events at the party she stripped at, but the police officers involved did nothing with the obvious lies and presented the same lies as the truth in testimony to a Grand Jury and to various judicial officers.  Given the political atmosphere of threats from black thugs like the NBPP and Al Sharpton, that would be no surprise given the Duke Lacrosse incident where black politicians, the NBPP and Al Sharpton were also involvled.  Threats of violence were openly expressed against the Duke student athletes and the community if something was not done by authorities and the DPD officers obliged by lying and covering up exculpatory evidence.  Just as it appears that the FDLE may have influenced witnesses to change their stories.  Perhaps these witnesses, like a witness for the defense in the Duke Lacrosse case, had an old criminal case resurrected in order to get a change in their statements.

Or perhaps it was just the plain threats of violence from the black community that got the witnesses to change their story.  Perhaps they did not want to have to go into hiding like Zimmerman.

But either way, these witnesses are useless.  No ethical prosecutor can use them for anything.  Their statements have been tainted.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Zimmerman Must Die

Aside from the racial angle, the nature of the case against George Zimmerman is slowly coming out.  ABC News is reporting that it is not the actual fight between Trayvon Martin and Zimmerman but Zimmerman's reaction to the shooting that will be the basis of the prosecution's case.

Of course psychological and physiological response to being involved in a deadly force incident is varied and not evidentiary to the actual legal basis for lawful use of deadly force, but Zimmerman's less than melodramatic response to shooting someone who was trying to kill him will be the basis for an appeal to the jury to convict him for murder for appearing to certain witnesses to be less than contrite.

ABC News/Yahoo  May 18, 2012 by Matt Gutman and Seni Tienabeso
Trayvon Martin Witness Believes 'He Intended for This Kid to Die'
A closer look at the witness statements and audio testimony taken in the immediate aftermath Trayvon Martin's death provides the first insight into George Zimmerman's behavior after he shot the unarmed teen.
A man listed as witness 13 was one of the first people to approach Zimmerman minutes after the shooting. He saw him bleeding from the back of the head and nose. Zimmerman asked the unidentified man to call his wife for him.
"Let her know what's happening, been involved in a shooting and will be held for questioning," the witness told the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. "He was more like, talking like he was having a hard time, looked like he just got his butt whipped ... not like he was in shock, not like, 'I can't believe I just shot someone,' but like, 'Just tell my wife I just shot someone,' like it was nothing."

Of course we know that Zimmerman had just got his butt whipped.  That is why he had to shoot Trayvon;  Getting your head bashed in on the sidewalk, your nose broke, and being punched in the face repeatedly will force you to act to save your life.  Perhaps Witness 13 will volunteer to experience getting his head bashed in and see what he would do to survive?  Just kidding, I don't think he will.

A woman identified as witness 5 walked out of her home after hearing the altercation to find Zimmerman standing over Martin's body. She said she asked him what was going on and he curtly said just, "Call the police."

And that is quite appropriate. If you have just stopped someone from assaulting your, the police should be called. Was she expecting a statement concerning the incident?  And more interesting is why she did not attempt to help Zimmerman when he was on his back getting an ass whopping?  She appears to be unconcerned about violent crime right outside her door.  There is, by the way, a legal obligation to assist someone in distress.

The woman told police that Zimmerman, 28, examined Martin's body as he slowly paced back and forth when the police arrived. She watched as they checked the teen's body and turned him over, eventually starting CPR. But he was already dead for five or 10 minutes, she said.

"I do honestly feel that he intended for this kid to die," witness 5 told investigators. "If you're in self-defense, shoot him in the leg. He's a 17-year-old, scrawny little kid. You get into a physical fight with him. ... I think the kid was running for help."

Really? And just how did she know that Zimmerman intended for Trayvon to die?  Is she psychic?  Can she read minds?  Clearly Zimmerman did not tell her that or it would have been in the report.  What is missing is most important.  There is nothing that suggests that Zimmerman was anything other than the victim of the thug Trayvon and he acted in self-defense.  Perhaps Witness 5 wanted Zimmerman to wail, rent his garments, and gnash his teeth.  However that is not what happens during the psychological reaction to such a traumatic event.  Quite shock is the most common reaction to shooting someone in self-defense.

And why did she say "honestly?"  That, according to experts, means she is lying.  It is a reaction to the lie she is telling herself.  She has to let the world know that this thing she is saying is different from when she usually speaks.  She is waiving a red flag, telling the world that her testimony has been corrupted.  If someone has to tell you this time they are telling the truth, the truth is not something you are getting.  As we shall see below.

Zimmerman’s reaction to the fight and his use of deadly force was not only reasonable, he was obviously concerned with the consequences of using deadly force.  Such an act is significant in one’s life.  One is changed forever and one knows that there may be consequences.  I am certain he was not expecting to be the object of a racial lynching and subject to the unethical and illegal use of the prosecutorial powers of the State, but nothing he did or said immediately after the shooting indicated a guilty conscience.

And just how did Witness 5 conclude that Trayvon was running for help? She did not see any part of the events preceding the second confrontation, nor the fight itself.  In fact Witness 5 seems to have been coached by the investigators or had her memory corrupted by later and inaccurate press reports. Trayvon was not running anywhere, he was assaulting Zimmerman.  Twice she also refers to Trayvon as a “kid,” once as a “skinny kid.”  This is even more evidence of after the fact corruption of her statement.  She would have had no knowledge of Trayvon except in the most recent months of seeing his baby pictures in the media.  Clearly the investigators must have coached her to say this or allowed post event information to color her statement.  A big No-No in the world of professional investigative procedure.

In any event, Trayvon wasn't running anywhere immediately preceding the second confrontation.  After initially evading Zimmerman by running, he walked back from the home he was staying at to confront Zimmerman.

She also appears to have watched too much television where people are always getting shot in the arm or leg by a movie star playing a sheriff or cowboy.  Well honey, that does just not happen in real life.  When using a firearm you can't just shoot to wound, much less shoot a small target like a leg or arm.  They are constantly moving and shooting for such a target is dangerous and irresponsible since one is quite likely to miss. In real life, nobody gets winged in the arm or leg except by accident, when a center-mass shot misses.

In fact, all law enforcement and the military throughout the United States are taught to shoot center mass of a target, of an assailant.  Why, because the center mass of a person's body is the largest target and consequently the target least likely to be missed, preventing rounds from going elsewhere, like into an innocent bystander, or through a window or door into a residence striking a neighbor.  Shooting center mass of a person's body is also where many vital organs are, and law enforcement in particular wants to stop someone who is subject to deadly force.  And the only way to stop an assailant, who, for instance is beating your head on the concrete, is to cause traumatic injury to their heart or lungs, forcing them to stop assaulting you.  Law enforcement shoots to stop, not to wound.  And center-mass is where law enforcement is trained to shoot.

But the world's ugliest woman, Angela Cory, should know this, for as the State's Attorney and former Assistant State's Attorney for the Jacksonville area, she was involved in making prosecutorial decisions about numerous police shootings, none of which she prosecuted.  The cops, who shot center-mass, and killed felons committing crimes, were innocent of any crime, just as Zimmerman is innocent of any crime.

But it appears that the world's ugliest woman is basing her prosecutorial strategy not on the facts of the fight between Zimmerman and Trayvon, but on perceived reaction of Zimmerman to the shooting.  For there is no reason for the investigators who spoke with any of these witnesses to be in any way concerned with Zimmerman's reaction to the shooting.  Since he was not jumping up and down for joy shouting that he finally got a notch in his gun, the opinions of witnesses as to what Zimmerman was thinking, what his reaction was, or what they though Zimmerman should have done is irrelevant.  A qualified investigator knows this and that any opinions of the witnesses will not be allowed in court.  So why is the prosecution harping on this with its leaks?  Why ask the witnesses what their opinions were?  In fact the alleged investigators should have only asked relevant questions that elicited facts from the witnesses.

In fact what Zimmerman did, ask someone to call the police, was the correct thing to do.  The police needed to be notified and an ambulance as well.  Of course, as most attorney's advise their law enforcement clients involved in a shooting incident to do, he should have said nothing more.  But what he did say, like call my wife, is not indicative of anything, much less criminal intent.  For one in this country has the right to remain silent.  Remaining silent is not evidence of guilt.  Nor is an innocuous statement like "Call my wife" evidence of anything and certainly not the mens rea for murder in the 2nd.  Nor is the opinion of a half-wit, who with no articulable evidence, accuses someone of intending to kill someone.  I hope Zimmerman's attorney brings a suit for libel and slander against Witness 5.

This case does bring up serious issues concerning the investigation by the Sanford Police Department and the State's Attorney's investigators.

Police said they believe Martin noticed he was being watched and "was in fact running generally in the direction of where he was staying as a guest of the neighborhood."

Here the stated conclusion is, as is said, counter-factual.  Trayvon confronted Zimmerman well away from his temporary residence, and, as has been shown, doubled back to confront Zimmerman.  If Trayvon had been running from Zimmerman he would have been home in less than a minute, but Trayvon returned in a fit of murderous rage to attack Zimmerman, a premeditated act, unlike Zimmerman, who acted in self-defense without any premeditation.

Multiple witnesses and injuries sustained corroborate Zimmerman's account that he was involved in a serious altercation with Martin, one that police say could have been avoided if he did not leave his car as directed by the 911dispatcher. The investigator said the tragedy was avoidable.

Of course, that conclusion is irrelevant and inflammatory.  In any event Zimmerman was not instructed by dispatchers to do anything, they told him that he did not need to follow Trayvon, and Zimmerman eventually complied with that request, mostly because he lost sight of Trayvon, who was running away, but would later return to attack Zimmerman.  Additionally, the dispatcher had no legal authority to instruct Zimmerman on any course of action.

For law enforcement investigators, their function is to present facts to a prosecutor, who makes a decision whether there is sufficient evidence beyond a reasonable doubt for a criminal conviction.  Investigators just present facts.  Commentary about whether an incident was avoidable is irrelevant to their function.  It is highly unethical to make such a statement in an investigative report.  One could just as well say that Zimmerman is guilty because he was there in the first place.  If he had not been patrolling at all the tragedy would have been avoided as well. If he had not bought a house in the neighborhood this would not have happened.  If he had not volunteered as a community activist with the neighborhood watch, this never would have happened. One cannot place the blame for a death on an act that was anything other than the act itself, unless the preceding acts were also crimes. In any event, that is an admission that Zimmerman acted lawfully.  It is clear that the police do not truly believe there is any evidence that Zimmerman was not acting in self-defense.

Here the investigator is blaming the victim.  The victim is guilty because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time.  The investigator is saying that people should cower in their homes at all times to avoid being a victim.  This is even more egregiousness because there is no law against confronting or speaking with someone in public.  It was not illegal for Zimmerman to confront Trayvon, as the initial incident between the two has been described.  Asking someone what they are doing on private property is not illegal.  It is not evidence of a crime.  But that is what the prosecution is trying to push on the public.  Angela Corey wants to criminalize being a victim, criminalize being a concerned member of the public, to criminalize public participation in the fight against crime.  Angela Corey wants to make Florida safe for criminals.

And that is why Zimmerman Must Die, he is now the Emmanuel Goldstein of race relations in this country.

Friday, May 18, 2012

Herein Lies The Problem

Inadvertently the Washington Times exposed the most significant problem with immigration and customs law enforcement, and, by implication Mittens, the dicotomy of the mission, facilitate lawful entry and exit of persons and goods, while enforcing 400 odd Federal laws.

The Washington Times  May 17, 2012 by Meredith Somers

Agents On Front Line Against Disease, Disaster

“We enforce more than 400 federal, state and local laws,” said CBP supervisor Christopher Downing. “We keep the economy flowing. That’s pretty much who we are.”
There we have it, in two sentences, the problem we face even if the Obama Regime is removed and Mittens takes the Helm of the Ship of State.  He is all about business and the bottom line in business is all about the Benjamins, filthy lucre.  Business knows no loyalty even to the free enterprise system, just as the Reds at Google and Facebook show.  The question is where does Mittens fall?  He certainly has a more respectable and conservative personal life; one wife, five children, grandchildren galore.  That does tell us something in comparison to the Pirates of Silicon Valley who don't marry, don't have kids and like Zuckerberg have an alien live-in girlfriend .  Zuckerberg of course was alienated himself from America as evidenced by his politics and his hatred for the WASP elite.  Mittens is in a different universe from these Captains of Industry, or at least of Made-in-China industry. 

But Mittens has his own issues.  Raiding and shutting down companies that were making a profit, just a profit not big enough for Bain Capital.  One has to say that is just business, but was it not really necessary?  Sometimes the Bain companies got turned around.  But it does tell us that the profit motive trumps everything.  And there as the bard says is the rub. 

And for immigration patriots there might be a problem.  Mittens will undoubtedly flood the country with so-called skilled workers, a flood of L-1 and H-1Bs competing with Americans, as well as B-1s working illegally.  This does not even include his idea of giving every alien who graduates with a STEM degree a green card.  There will be a war out there with employers replacing every skilled white worker with an alien of some sort.

And what does Mittens do when an E-Verify law starts hitting the illegal alien employers hard?  Will he resist their pressure?  I don't think so.  And I don't see Mittens acting on real welfare refom to force unemployed blacks into the labor market to replace the upcoming shortage of illegal alien workers at Chipotle and The French Gourmet.  Mau-mauing Mittens will be a full time sport for the MSM and the Justice Brothers.  And as we see from the recent Jerimiah Wright kerfuffle, he just can't stand up to pressure, even when standing up is in his own interest.

We got a problem people.  A real problem.

My Latest On VDare

Check it out here.  Contribute to VDare here.

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

In The No Surprises Department

The Daily Caller has identified several current and former DHS officials serving under the Obama Regime that have no law enforcement background, much less any immigration law enforcement background.  Basically a cadre of political hacks are running the agency whose primary mission is protecting the United States from terrorist attack and enforcing immigration and customs laws.

The Daily Caller May 14, 2012 by Matthew Boyle

President Barack Obama’s Homeland Security secretary, Janet Napolitano, has presided over the hiring of at least four senior staffers and advisers who have no law enforcement experience but align politically with the president.
Jordan Grossman was a special adviser and deputy to the deputy chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security, for instance, yet his resume shows no law enforcement experience. Before Grossman got his post in January 2009, he was a “special assistant” at the Obama-Biden presidential transition team after working for Obama’s 2008 election campaign.
Before that, Grossman worked as a research assistant at the Annenberg Public Policy Center, a communications think tank at the University of Pennsylvania. Grossman also interned for the left-wing Center for American Progress, and for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
He lists no law enforcement experience on his resume, even though the Obama administration had hired him into a senior law enforcement role. Grossman has since left his government position for to attend Harvard Law School.
Vladimir Skoric serves as a “special assistant” to the Homeland Security “deputy under secretary for cybersecurity.” Skoric began his career in politics in May 2007 as a “volunteer coordinator” at Obama For America. He then interned for Washington Democratic Sen. Patty Murray and served as Obama For America’s Washington, D.C. youth director.
But what the Daily Caller missed was that none of the top Bush or Obama DHS or ICE officials had law enforcement experience either.  Michael Chertoff, the first DHS secretary was a lawyer, Janet Reno Napolitano, the current Secretary of DHS, is a lawyer and politician, Julie Meyers, the first head of ICE and later lobbyist for illegal alien employers, was a lawyer with a previous political appointment at the Department of Commerce Office of Export Controls, John Morton, the current head of ICE, is a lawyer, Alan Bersin, failed nominee for the Commissoner of Customs and Border Protection, was a lawyer, not trained and experienced law enforcement managers.  The only major position held in DHS by an experience immigration law enforcement officer, Acting Commissioner of CBP, David Aguilar, turned out to be a Mexican more concerned with administering amnesty and aiding illegals than enforcing the law.  Aguilar it must be noted was steadily promoted by the Bush Administration, undoubtedly enamored with Mexicans and the Rove strategy of a failed appeal to Mexican voters. 

It is clear that a not so secret cadre of alwyers have been administering an ongoing amnesty for illegal aliens through both the Bush and Obama Regimes.  It is time to replace lawyers at law enforcement agencies with law enforcement professionals and in the case of DHS, promote only from within.  No outside law enforcement agency has any immigration enforcement duties and is just not capable of managing an immigration law enforcement strategy.  It is also important that those with close connections and loyalties to other nations should not be in DHS, much less managing major components. 

Saturday, May 12, 2012

Investor Program Just For Obtaining Escape Passports

The open fraud of the EB-5 Investor Visa program is becoming more obvious and the fraud more blatant as Chinese nationals who fear the coming collapse of China and the inevitable implosion of the Chinese Communist Party in an orgy of a blood letting purge seek out a bolt hole by purchasing residency and eventually American citizenship.  America is the first refuge for these scoundrels and all they need to purchase safety is a cool $500k.  And yearning to be free and become Americans is not their intent, but to survive and remain Chinese.

WSJ/FoxDFW May 11, 2012 by Jason Chow and Angus Loten
More Wealthy Chinese Prepare Exits
Some immigration lawyers have seen a new increase in the number of Chinese seeking foreign citizenship, a trend they suggest is tied to worries about political turmoil and economic slowdown in China, especially among businesspeople and politicians seeking to protect their families and wealth.
"There's definitely a surge in China for what I call 'let-me-out-now' product," according to Jean-Francois Harvey, an immigration lawyer based in Hong Kong who deals with clients throughout Asia.
The recent interest builds on a trend of growth in applications from Chinese seeking to emigrate to places like the US, Canada and the UK in recent years, including to programs that promise citizenship in exchange for investments.  In the US, 75 percent of investor-immigrant applicants were from China in fiscal 2011.
The rush to apply to the US investor immigration program, known as the EB5 visa, is also partly prompted by Washington politics. The plan has to be reauthorized by Congress in September for it to continue, but applications filed before that date will still be considered. Last time the program was up for review, in 2009, there was a big spike in applications.
Under the program, applicants and their immediate families receive permanent US residency if an investment of at least $1 million in the US leads to 10 full-time jobs within two years. The requirement is only $500,000 if the US jobs created are in a rural or high-unemployment area.
There is little information on the identities and actual numbers of Chinese seeking to leave, but participants in the industry that has grown up around such requests say they have seen increased activity in the weeks since the Communist Party's ouster of senior party official Bo Xilai, which adds to a general feeling of uncertainty ahead of a once-a-decade leadership transition in the fall. 

All America is to them is a temporary refugee during internecine struggles, purges, and obtaining a passport of convenience.  Like the so-called Vietnamese refugees who are flooding back to Vietnam and forever remain Vietnamese, never becoming American, these Chinese purchasing residency and citizenship are contributing nothing, as no one is verifying any of the jobs that are supposedly created.  Most EB-5 visas are obtained by fraud and never involve an alien investing and creating jobs with a good business idea, but serve as nothing more than pass-through investors who run from any investment after they obtain their green cards.

Fox News December 6, 2011 by Bob Dane
Is Our Government Authorizing Shady Middlemen to Sell Green Cards?

The con man has an offer too good to resist. He, along with hundreds of others can be authorized by the federal government to manage investment money and sell green cards to foreign investors under a federal program known as the EB-5 Investor Visa. 
The Senate Judiciary Committee is holding a hearing this week on the program but the title “Reauthorizing the EB-5 Regional Center Program: Promoting Job Creation and Economic Development in American Communities” is troubling.  It indicates the Committee may simply rubber-stamp continuation of the program instead of subjecting it to a long overdue, thorough and transparent investigation of the program.
EB-5 was put into place in 1992 to spur job growth by offering green cards to foreigners in exchange for an investment of $500,000 to $1 million. Each investment is supposed to create 10 jobs. 10,000 green cards are allotted for this purpose each year.
The United States Customs and Immigration Service (USCIS) has authorized 204 EB-5 regional centers, each officially defined as “any economic entity, public or private, which is involved with the promotion of economic growth, improved regional productivity, job creation and increased domestic capital investment.” The centers serve as middlemen to initiate the process of reaching out to foreign investors and matching their investments with local projects...
While some of the EB-5 regional centers are large and appear to be engaged in legitimate investments, upon close examination of the entire list, almost a third of the centers appear to be dubious, one-person shops with “CEOs” who have generic e-mails ending in “gmail,” “hotmail” or “yahoo.”

At least 43 centers do not even have a website, 11 have no contact information, and of those regional center websites that are active, many are either barely legible or not written in English. Interestingly, some of the regional centers are actually immigration attorney websites.

The EB-5 program is nothing more than selling passports to enemy aliens.  And electing a new people. 

Thursday, May 10, 2012

ICE Ignoring Alien Voters

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is ignoring a developing scandaly in Florida where thousands of aliens voters have been identified by local authorities.

The Miami Herald May 12, 2012

Florida’s elections rolls may include thousands of foreigners who might have illegally cast ballots. The state is trying to track them down.

Thousands of foreign citizens — particularly in South Florida — might be registered to vote in Florida and could have unlawfully cast ballots in previous elections.

The potential problem is largest in Florida’s largest county: Miami-Dade, where the elections supervisor is examining 2,000 potentially unlawful voters, WFOR-CBS 4 News reported Tuesday. Broward is examining 260 suspected foreign voters. One suspected noncitizen voter has been registered for about 40 years, CBS 4 found.

Over the past year, the Florida Division of Elections has begun identifying potential foreigners on the rolls in coordination with the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Division of Elections spokesman Chris Cate told The Miami Herald. He said the state has forwarded the names to county elections supervisors, who are in charge of the rolls.

“There will be more names,” Cate said.

The discovery of potentially unlawful voters is sure to fuel the partisan debate over voter fraud and voting rights. With 1.2 million registered voters in Miami-Dade, 2,000 potentially ineligible voters might not seem like a big number. However, it is more than enough to swing a close election in a state like Florida, where the 2000 presidential election was decided in favor of George W. Bush by 537 votes.
And the Demoncrats are defending voting by aliens:

The Miami Herald May 10, 2012 By Marc Caputo

The political left and right are taking opposite sides over the effort to root out non-citizen voters in Florida as it follows the lead of Republicans in two other swing states.

Amid an increasingly partisan dog fight, Florida elections officials say the number of potential non-citizens they’re examining on the state voter rolls is 180,000, a figure far higher than what was initially reported.

Florida’s Division of Elections said Thursday that it’s combing through this initial, mammoth list of names — which were flagged during a computer database search — to make sure its list is as clean and as small as possible. The state is then turning over smaller batches of the more-verified names to local county election supervisors, who are contacting the potential non-citizens to see if they can lawfully vote.

By the end of the process, the state could send counties as many as 22,000 names to check, one election source indicated, in a state with more than 12 million total voters.

Right now, local supervisors have been sent nearly 2,700 names, about 2,000 of which are in Miami-Dade, Florida’s most-populous and most-immigrant heavy county.

Some Democrats accuse the Republican-appointed Secretary of State Ken Detzner of engaging in a type of “voter suppression.” But Detzner’s office said he’s trying to make sure no unlawful votes are cast — and it indicated that Obama’s Administration is stonewalling the effort by refusing to share Department of Homeland Security databases that could more easily show who’s a citizen and who’s not.

“We have been requesting DHS access since September of last year,” said Florida’s Division of Elections spokesman, Chris Cate. “We can do our checks. But we’re restricted in the level of confirmation we can do. We need help from the federal government. But so far, we’ve been unsuccessful.”

A DHS official would only say in an email that Florida's request poses "a number of legal and operational challenges."

U.S. Rep. Frederica Wilson, D-Miami, said in a written statement that DHS shouldn’t cooperate.
No ICE investigation, ICE refusing to provide records necessary to prosecute the aliens.  Another criminal alien amnesty from the Obama Regime.  Literally electing a new people, with alien votes.

Buzz Words The New Border Patrol Strategery

The U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) has announced a new strategery for enforcement, or lack thereof, for the foreseeable future.  It appears to be a long-term plan for serious cuts to border enforcement as it seems to depend on a reactive game plan and to depend on its "partners" to enforce the laws of the United States.

USA Today/Associated Press May 8, 2012

SAN DIEGO (AP) – The Border Patrol on Tuesday unveiled its first national strategy in eight years, a period in which the number of agents more than doubled and apprehensions of people entering illegally from Mexico dropped to a 40-year low.

The new approach — outlined in a 32-page document that took more than two years to develop — uses buzzwords like "risk-based" and "intelligence-driven" to describe a more nuanced, targeted response to constantly evolving threats.

The Border Patrol previously relied on a strategy that blanketed heavily trafficked corridors for illegal immigrants with agents, pushing migrants to more remote areas where they would presumably be easier to capture and discouraged from trying again.

"The jury, for me at least, is out on whether that's a solid strategy," Chief Mike Fisher told the Associated Press.

The new strategy draws on intelligence to identify repeat crossers and to try to determine why they keep coming, said Fisher, who was expected to address a House subcommittee on the plan Tuesday.

"This whole risk-based approach is trying to figure out who are these people? What risk do they pose from a national security standpoint? The more we know, the better informed we are about identifying the threat and potential risk," he said in a recent interview.
However the elephant in the room, or the dog that did not bark, is what is missing from the report.  And that is there is nothing concerning redeploying excess capacity at the border to interior enforcement.  Long ago the USBP had an enforcement mission within the United States, maintaining stations, mostly in agricultural areas of the interior, where it enforced immigration laws.  They shared interior enforcement duties with the legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) District Offices that helped keep illegal aliens from establishing a permanent presence in the United States, keeping illegal aliens off balance and always in fear of discovery.

Since the Jorge Bush Admininstration, the USBP abandoned that force posture, closing interior stations and moving all resources to the border.  The USBP also gradually restricted and almost completely abandoned agricultural and interior enforcement near the border as well.  Previously in border counties the USBP shared worksite enforcement and general enforcement duties with the legacy INS' Investigations section, but that was ended under Bush as well, with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) gradually ending interior enforcement as well, culminating in the Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty.  Interestingly enough with the formation of ICE in 2002, one of its first demands was the transfer of all interior enforcement to itself, which it promptly abandoned;  a clear sign that the Administrative Amnesty was well underway before the Obama Regime came into office.

What should be the new operational strategy for the USBP is to take up the work that ICE has abandoned.  The USBP has the personnel to shift substantial resources from the border to the interior and capitalize on improvements on the border and begin the process of attrition through enforcement.  That is not to say to abandon the border, but shift 5,000 or so Border Patrol Agents to the interior and effect a real change in security strategy by bringing enforcement to where much of the problem is, the interior.

Deportations Of Criminal Aliens Continue To Collapse

Despite claims that the Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty was necessary so as to free up U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to concentrate on criminal aliens and deport the worst of the worst, deportations of criminal aliens are collapsing;  for the first quarter of 2012, only 5,450 criminal aliens were placed in removal proceedings, down from 10,732 from the first quarter of 2008.

Transactional Clearing House May 8, 2012

(08 May 2012) Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) continues to cite criminal activity as grounds for deportation less often than it used to, according to the latest Immigration Court data on new deportation proceedings. During the most recent quarter (January - March 2012), ICE sought to deport a total of 5,450 individuals on criminal grounds.

While this number is preliminary and is likely to increase once late reports are in, it represents a drastic decrease compared with 10,732 individuals against whom ICE sought deportation orders just two years ago. This suggests that the announced plan to increase the deportation of serious criminals through Immigration Court proceedings has not been successful.

Not only has the number of criminally charged individuals dropped, but the percentage of all deportation proceedings involving criminal charges has been falling as well. These trends also hold for each of the five nationalities (Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras and China) which together account for nearly four out of five individuals against whom deportation charges were filed.
It is clear, and was predicted, that the concentration on criminal aliens was not just a fig leaf for amnesty, but was from the begining to include criminal aliens, as predicted by this blog.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

More ICE Fail

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which claims that its first priority is identifying and removing alien terrorists, has again failed to execute its self-identified primary mission.  Other federal agencies shut down an Lebanese terrorism funding operation based around used car dealerships.  Again, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), is in the lead, based on its performance based intelligence and enforcement activities.  Interestingly enough, the terrorists were undoubtedly involved in heroin smuggling as well, the reason for the initial involvement of the DEA, but with ICE wasting its resources on hunting down marijuana growers, someone had to step in.

ABC News December 16, 2011 (A little old, but news to me)

More than two dozen U.S. car dealerships were allegedly involved in an international half-billion-dollar money laundering scheme for Lebanon-based Hezbollah, a group considered a terrorist organization by the U.S. government, federal officials said.

Federal agents served restraining orders and grilled employees at as many as 30 used car dealerships around the country, as part of a civil case that also named a Lebanese bank and two exchange houses as part of the plot.

According to a 62-page complaint filed in Manhattan federal court, the scheme involved the purchases of used cars in the U.S. for shipment and sale abroad with funds provided by the banks, currency exchanges and associates of the Lebanon-based terrorist group.

The restraining orders are intended to seize the assets of all of the used car dealerships named in the federal complaint, according to the Drug Enforcement Agency. "We're looking to shut down this trade-based money laundering scheme," DEA agent Derek Maltz told ABC News. "And we're looking to take the profits away from Hezbollah and other terror groups around the world."

The complaint alleges that banks in Lebanon wired over $300 million into the U.S. for the purchase and shipment of used cars to West Africa. Proceeds from those sales were then allegedly funneled back to Lebanon to support Hezbollah causes.

Illegal aliens were undoubtedly involved as well, but ICE failed to take action.  Obviously not one of their priorities arresting illegal alien Muslim terrorists.

Friday, May 4, 2012

ICE Failure On An Unprecedented Level

Illegal alien gangbangers yesterday shot 3 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Special Agents raiding their hideout.  After the shooting, only one of the gangbangers was arrested, apparently on the arrest warrant at issue, but the rest of the family, including the gangbangers father, Victor Flores, who openly bragged that "we" shot back, were not arrested.  Only Victor Flores Jr. was arrested.  Senior, who of course spoke no English, was not arrested, nor were the rest of the illegal alien family members.

ABC News 7  May 3, 2012 by Vic Lee, Mark Matthews, and Lilian Kim
Exclusive Interview With Family Who Got Raided
The family in Petaluma is so upset that they don't even want to go back to their home. They called ABC7 Thursday evening, specifically to share their story.
"I was very scared because I thought they were going to kill us," Victor Flores said.
Victor didn't want to show his face, but he says he and his two sons were inside their Petaluma home when federal agents stormed in Thursday morning. He says his oldest son, Victor Jr., started shooting at the agents, who he says were wearing all black, with nothing identifying themselves as officers.
"We shot back because we thought they were gangsters. We never knew they were police because they never introduced themselves as police officers," Victor said.
As for Victor Jr., he was taken into custody. Authorities say he's one of 13 suspected gang members arrested Thursday morning for a triple murder in South San Francisco in 2010.

ICE, of course, is clueless.  They have an illegal alien gang problem, but aren't making arrests.

"Without a shadow of a doubt, this incident underscores how dangerous this gang is, and why this morning's arrest is such welcome news for residents of this community," Clark Settles with Homeland Security Investigations said.

Which begs the question, why does ICE exist if they will not arrest illegal aliens who have family ties to gangs and fire on ICE agents?  Does the Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty extend to people like Victor Flores Sr. who shoot at ICE agents?  Stupid question.  Of course it does.  Victor Flores Sr. is openly bragging about his gunfight with ICE agents and he remains free.

Which also begs the question, if these gangbangers were involved in a murder in South San Francisco, why was not local law enforcement arresting them for murder?  Why is ICE involved in a murder arrest?  The Petaluma Police Department has a SWAT Team, the South San Francisco Police Department has a SWAT Team, and the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office has a SWAT Team.  Why was ICE involved if they weren't going to arrest the illegal alien family members?

I also wonder if Mike McDaniel will be trumpeting the cause of these gangbangers?  They say that ICE did not knock and announce.  Will McDaniel be championing these gangbangers like he did Jose Guerena?

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

More ICE Audit Fail

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) continues its failed policy of auditing employers of illegal aliens, but not raiding, arresting and deporting the illegals who work for those employers.  In another case of ICE audit fail, a famous taqueria in the San Francisco Bay Area, El Balazo, decided after an ICE audit to rehire the illegal aliens that ICE forced it to fire.

San Jose Mercury News April 26, 2012 by Robert Salonga (Reporter of color assigned to stories of color, a.k.a. the journalist ghetto)

But their worker base aroused suspicion and eventually a federal investigation. By the time it was over, Marino Sandoval had admitted to federal prosecutors that he knowingly hired employees not legally authorized to work in the United States. Between 2007 and 2008, prosecutors said, the chain employed more than 100 illegal immigrants.

After federal authorities confronted Marino Sandoval with their findings, he rehired at least 10 of the unauthorized employees, prosecutors said.

Nicole Sandoval would later admit to underreporting employees' wages to decrease the businesses' tax burdens and providing false Social Security numbers for them.

The scrutiny would also ensnare Sandoval's brother, Francisco Sandoval, 56, of Alameda, the former manager of the San Francisco location. He was sentenced in December 2010 to three years of probation and ordered to pay $50,000 to the IRS.
Of course, all of this ICE fail is part of the ongoing Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty.  It does tell us that it is not just workers doing jobs Americans won't, but a business plan, like Chipolte or Boeing, who depend on not only paying slave wages, but not funding Social Security and Medicaid as well.  A business plan based on lies and deceit.  And not paying other taxes as well.  This nation is the victim in this alleged victimless crime.

Racial Double Standard

The radical left has discovered the right to keep and bear arms, to stand one's ground and use deadly force in self-defense.  Unfortunately, only black women are allowed these rights.  That right however does not extend to "white" Hispanic males.

The Atlantic Wire/Yahoo May 1, 2012 by Alexander Abad-Santos

What happened to Marissa Alexander sure sounds a lot like 'standing your ground': her abusive husband came after her, choked her, and when she finally broke free, she grabbed a gun fired a single warning shot into ceiling ... so why is she set to serve 20 years in jail?

Well, we imagine her prosecutor Angela Corey, who's also charging George Zimmerman, has the unfulfilling answers. The Florida Times Union's Charles Broward reported on April 21, "A judge denied [Alexander] immunity in a Stand Your Ground hearing. And after a jury found her guilty, she faces a mandatory term of 20 years in prison." Yes, there's the rage-inducing fact that Zimmerman who allegedly pursued and killed Trayvon Martin was allowed to walk free that night while Alexander is going to spend 20 years of her life in prison for a single warning shot. But it's also complex in that, those seeking justice for Trayvon Martin may have to side with a prosecutor who give denies Alexander's (and the NAACP's) plea for a "stand your ground" ruling, like the one that was initially afforded to Zimmerman.

"There's a double standard with stand your ground," says Isaiah Rumlin, president of the Jacksonville Chapter of the NAACP. "The law is applied differently between African-Americans and whites who are involved in these types of cases." As Time's Touré points out, "there is one last sliver of hope left for Alexander: the court will soon hear arguments for a retrial." Jacksonville's News 4 added yesterday, "Judge James Daniel set a post-trial motions hearing for 8:30 a.m. Thursday. Daniel said if the motions are denied, she could be sentenced as soon as next week."

It is amazing what rights you gain when you're born with black skin and no testicles.  Of course, it never occured to Yahoo and the Atlantic that perhaps the world's uglies and evil woman was wrong on both cases?  But to race mongers like Abad-Santos, it is all about the evil white man...ehrrr..white woman, or at least the white power structure.  That is the alpha and the omega of their existence, race war with whitey.

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Lies About The Support Our Law Enforcement And Safe Neighborhoods Act

My latest post at VDare is up.  Be sure and donate as well.  A beautiful child needs new mittens.

Banned From NRO

The pussies at NRO deleted my account from the site.  Too many frank comments on their liberalism and fear of the truth.  No free speech there.