Sunday, March 31, 2013

Immigration Or The First Amendment

You can't have both.  And who says so?  The Treason Bar.  Freedom of speech is incompatible with immigration and those who advocate immigration.  Just as immigrants oppose the Second Amendment, they, and their representatives, oppose the First Amendment.  And the Treason Bar is on a jihad against those who dare speak out against the ongoing Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty.

The Daily Caller March 27, 2013 by Neil Munro
Immigration Lawyer Demands Firing Of Immigration Union Official
The general counsel of a wealthy industry group is angrily calling on President Barack Obama to fire an union activist who is urging Congress to incorporate union members’ views in a pending bill that is now being written in secret...
David Leopold, the general counsel of the America Immigration Lawyers Association, aimed his March 26 invective at Christopher Crane, the serving president of the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council. The council is an AFL-CIO affiliate that represents 7,000 federal immigration officers and employees...
“How do you spell #insubordination? … Time for ICE to demand union boss Chris Crane’s badge & show him the door,” Leopold tweeted Tuesday...
Crane “is a bureaucrat, and bureaucrats don’t make policy,” Leopold claimed. “He’s out there and he’s criticizing the president. … He’s commenting on policy, not on union business or work conditions.”
“How is immigration policy part of union’s business? It is not,” said Leopold, whose clients include major health-care institutions and teaching hospitals who wish to import foreign medical professionals, such as nurses and doctors.



Leopold's war on the First Amendment is symptomatic of the radical left and their contempt for America and its freedoms.  All that matters to them is electing a new people and the suppression of dissenting opinions.  That an attorney would call for something so blatantly unlawful is astounding. Government employees hold First Amendment rights; the right of free speech and the right to peaceably petition the government.  As do union officials.  And you never heard a lawyer saying that a company has the right to fire union officers when the officers or union criticizes an employer.  The radical left and the Treason Bar would rise up in indignation.  But freedom of speech does not apply to those who oppose Barak Hussein Obama or oppose amnesty for illegal aliens.

Also note that the ICE union is not being supported by the AFL-CIO.  The AFL-CIO will not even support its constituent unions it is so compromised by cultural Marxism.

Crane, of course, has been a long time thorn in the side of the Regime.  And a target of the Treason Bar.  He has well earned the evil gaze of the Great Eye.

What is Leopold's other concern is the interference that Crane is in the amnesty scheme and future income Leopold will earn from amnesty for illegals and more alien workers displacing Americans. And Leopold will destroy the country and the principles of freedom of speech in his greed and ideology.

It also tells us that immigration is incompatible with basic American freedoms.  We cannot have immigration and their advocates and still hold our freedoms.  In the end, immigrants and their partisans will destroy freedom in their evil.

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Suddenly, Federal Law Can Be Enforced By Local Law Enforcement

It was not too long ago that the radical left was insistent that State law enforcement officers had no authority to enforce Federal law.  Of course, the only issue was that the radical left did not want State officers enforcing immigration law.  And it was not a matter of Constitutional principle, but mere political expediency   The ends justifying the means as all Marxists believe.  

But all has changed.  Suddenly enforcing Federal law is now the primary responsibility of State and local law enforcement.

Washington Times March 27, 2013 by Paul Bedard
Law Would Fire Sheriffs For Defying Gun Control Measures
Supporters of the 380 sheriffs in 15 states who so far have vowed to defy new state and federal gun control laws claim that legislation is starting to pop up around the nation to fire any state elected or appointed law enforcement official who doesn't obey federal orders.
The first effort emerged in Texas. Legislation proposed by Dallas Democratic Rep. Yvonne Davis would remove any sheriff or law enforcement officer who refuses to enforce state or federal laws.
What's more, it would remove any elected or appointed law enforcement officer for simply stating or signing any document stating that they will not obey federal orders.
A gun lobbyist told Secrets, "Beware because once something like this is introduced in one state, it will be followed very quickly in several other states."


So, the State of Arizona can't enforce immigration law because of Federal primacy, but State law enforcement officers can be dragooned into serving at the orders of any Federal bureaucrat.  Essentially every local law enforcement officer would serve at the pleasure of the President.  So much for separation of powers or federalism.  It would be a unitary executive that leftists said they feared in Jorge Bush.

And to the Rainbow Confederates and gun nut MLK wannabees, Representative Davis is, of course, black.  We can see her motivation.  She finds any push back against attacks on the Constitution and the rights held by Americans by white sheriffs and other law enforcement leaders to be disrespectful of Barak Hussein Obama and a defiance of Black Run America.  More evidence, as if it were needed, that only whites support the Constitution and the rights it protects.

My Latest On VDare

A Bodyguard of Lies

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Cultural Marxists Upset That The Law Is Being Enforced

The cultural Marxists who run the media are upset that Joe Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa County and Bill Montgomery, County Attorney for Maricopa County are throwing a wrench in the ongoing illegal and unconstitutional Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty.  It appears that their aggressive enforcement of laws against identity theft are thwarting amnesty claims by hundreds of illegal aliens who stole the identities of Americans.

Salon March 17, 2013 by Valeria Fernandez
How Arizona Cheats Immigration Reform
Activists are denouncing state lawmakers for charging immigrants with felonies to ensure their deportation.
PHOENIX–Ivon Matamoros has been packing most of her baby daughter’s clothes and blankets to start a reluctant journey back to Mexico. Matamoros, 24, could be among hundreds of youth who qualify for a deportation reprieve under President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). But she didn’t apply.
Matamoros didn’t think she would qualify because she has a felony on her record — for working with false documents as a cashier and buser at a Pei Wei chain restaurant.
An immigration judge told her this was a “crime of moral turpitude” and that she would have to leave. He gave her a date to do so, willingly: March 21.
“The judge said it reflected badly on my character,” said Matamoros. “If I didn’t have that felony, I would have been able to qualify for DACA.”

Thank goodness that even the Regime's amnesty doesn't include felons, or not.  In reality though, the Regime is eager to include felons and other criminals as well.  But the real complaint is that the ongoing amnesty is without legal foundation, but the cultural Marxists and their anti-white racist allies among the illegal aliens object that enforcement of duly enacted legislation is interfering with an unlawful act by Barak Hussein Obama.  Or interfering with legislation that has been soundly defeated repeatedly in the past.
As discussions ramp up in Congress to come up with a federal comprehensive immigration reform bill, pro-immigrant groups and attorneys in Arizona are denouncing the raids and prosecutions of workers like Matamoros, which could hurt their chances of becoming documented residents.
Most immigration reform proposals exclude people with criminal records; millions of workers currently using false documents to work on the United States could lose out if they get arrested.
Matamoros was among hundreds of unauthorized workers in Maricopa County who ended up in deportation proceedings as a result of business worksite raids carried out by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Workers in her situation are being charged with multiple counts of identity theft, typically a Class 4 felony, and offered plea bargains to a lower charge, such as “taking the identity of another,” a Class 6 violation.
“Maricopa County is the only county that is doing these raids. They don’t have to do these raids–that is immigration’s job,” said Carlos Garcia, director of Puente, a pro-immigrant and human rights organization in Phoenix.
Puente organized a march this week to protest Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery for prosecuting these cases and charging undocumented workers with felonies that can lead to their deportation.
“Immigration reform starts at home,” Garcia stated. “If we don’t stop Arpaio and Bill Montgomery, the people from the 71 raids are never going to be able to obtain citizenship or any other legal status in the country because of the felonies.”
That would certainly be a crying shame.  But kudos to Arpaio and Montgomery for doing the work that the Department of Homeland Security won't, subjecting illegal aliens to full force of the law.

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Not Just Evil, But Stupid As Well

Rand Paul strides like Colossus astride the Beltway, now all things to all men...ehr Parties.  He has adopted the Obama Regime's push for amnesty for the 20 million or so illegal aliens in the United States.  He is the essence of what Sam Francis described as what happens when the Evil Party and the Stupid Party do something bipartisan, something both stupid and evil.  And Rand Paul delivers in spades. 

Take this gem:

WSJ March 19, 2013
Text of Rand Paul's Immigration Speech
The first part of my plan – border security – must be certified by Border Patrol and an Investigator General and then voted on by Congress to ensure it has been accomplished.

WTF?!  Just what is an Investigator General?  Has anyone heard of this?  No one should have.  There is no such thing.  However there is as mandated by the Inspector General Act of 1973, as amended, and the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as amended, an Inspector General, who heads the Office of Inspector General, in the Department of Homeland Security.

Well, not quite.  There is no Inspector General at DHS. The post is vacant, as are many other Inspectors General posts that remain mysteriously unfilled by the Obama Regime, often for years at a time.  There is only a Deputy Inspector General, interestingly himself an immigrant. Undoubtedly because the Regime does not like the watchdog efforts of Inspectors General. They have fired an Inspector General, Gerald Walpin, who got too close to Regime corruption. They would much rather have a compliant bureaucrat running a formally headless organization, more than willing to pull their punches during politically dangerous investigations, just as DHS OIG has been with years of no Inspector General and an Deputy Inspector General himself under investigation.

HuffPo April 6, 2012 by Andrew Becker
Homeland Security Office Accused of Faking Reports on Internal Investigations
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security's watchdog agency is in turmoil amid allegations that its agents in Texas were told to falsify reports ahead of an office inspection last fall, according to an internal email and interviews.
Thomas M. Frost, the department's chief investigator, and deputy John Ryan were placed on administrative leave March 29, according to the email sent to managers nationwide last week.
Frost and Ryan declined to comment as did Acting Inspector General Charles K. Edwards.
Wayne H. Salzgaber, another deputy, wrote in the email that Ryan, who oversees the inspection operations, and Frost were on leave pending the conclusion of a U.S. Department of Justice and FBI investigation into the matter.
"The Acting [inspector general] decided to take this action in the interest of continuing our operations during the investigation with the least amount of disruption to our mission," he wrote. "I am confident that this situation will be short lived and that DOJ will quickly resolve this matter..."
A federal grand jury in Washington has been convened to hear testimony over whether agents in a McAllen, Texas, field office fabricated "investigative activity" to show progress on misconduct cases involving homeland security employees, officials familiar with the probe told the Center for Investigative Reporting.


Even worse, Edwards himself has been called before the Grand Jury over this an other issues related to nepotism and misuse of government resources.

Of course, he has not been fired, unlike Walpin, whom the Regime needed removed because he got too close to a top Obama supporter.  Edwards is just the type the Regime wants around.  He has rumors of skeletons in his closet and is consequently open to pressure.  Such as pressure to declare the border secure.  Just as a famous Mexican Border Patrol head would have declared the border secure if asked.

But back to Rand Paul, poster boy for bipartisanship.  One cries for our beloved country with leadership so dumb they can't even get things so simple as Inspector General correct.  What is the implication for more complicated issues than the correct title of a senior government position just underneath a cabinet officer?  Nothing good I fear.  Stupid and Evil, will that be America's epitaph?  Most likely if the Paulbots keep telling us to Stand With Rand.

Saturday, March 16, 2013

ICE Releasing Illegals But Busting U.S. Citizen Tweekers

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has finally admitted that Barak Hussein Obama and Janet Reno Napolitano were lying all along and their claim that only a few hundred harmless illegal aliens were released in anticipation of sequester were neither.  The released illegal aliens were in the thousands and many were dangerous felons.  Some of whom the hapless ICE is trying to recapture.

Of interest is at the same time ICE Special Victims Unit (ICE SVU) is continuing its search for a mission other than arresting and holding illegal aliens.  While claiming it did not have enough funds to hold illegal alien felons, ICE SVU decided that it would now target U.S. citizen tweekers and the meth they cook.

Press-Republican March 15, 2013 by Lois Clermont 
Police Arrest Meth Suspect 
RAY BROOK — State Police have arrested a Redford woman who is wanted on drug charges after allegedly jumping bail. 
Susan J. Filion, 47, was being sought on two felony charges: second-degree criminal possession of a controlled substance and third-degree unlawful manufacture of methamphetamine. 
Those charges stem from an investigation into Filion making methamphetamine at her residence at 243 Priest Road, Redford, on Sept. 10, 2012, according to a State Police news release... 
The Adirondack Drug Task Force is made up of members from the Drug Enforcement Agency, New York State Police, Plattsburgh City Police Department, Clinton County Sheriff’s Department, U.S. Border Patrol, Homeland Security Investigations, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Clinton County District Attorney’s Office.

So while alien felons run free, ICE SVU is wasting its resources chasing tweekers and cookers. Work the DEA and local police should be doing.

Dictatorship Of The Pseudo-Kritarchs

Or, more accurately, the kritarch wannabes.  Actually, in this case, the "judges" in question, are, in fact, Executive Branch employees, nothing more than any other bureaucrat in the Executive Branch.  But in this case the kritarchs desire to emulate the dictator wannabes in the Judicial Branch.  And the issue melds with the ongoing Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty for illegal aliens.  

For some time, radicals in the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), part of the Department of Justice, the so-called immigration courts, have desired to impose their own will on both Congress and the President, creating their own immigration law enforcement system in imitation of the coup d'etat directed at the Constitution by the FDR and Warren Courts.  Both sought in their own way the overthrow of the historical Constitution and its replacement with radical leftist contempt for the separation of powers between the Federal government and the States.  The FDR courts sought to insert the Federal government in the smallest economic decisions by the citizenry and the Warren Court, even more radicalized, sought to impose its own moral system on the States, destroying traditional law enforcement, causing stunning increase crime, fomenting a race war of black on white violence, and imposing a racial spoils system on the nation based on preferences in all areas for non-whites over whites.

The cadre of hearing officers in the EOIR is envious of the raw power and independence of the Federal judiciary and wishes to become more like it, creating its own power center in the area of immigration law.  And they don't want to more actively enforce the law, but develop and expand their own immigration amnesty as this blog has reported.

The first connection is that one of the rationalizations of the Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty and its "prosecutorial discretion" is that the EOIR is overwhelmed with cases, all the fault of Congress who allow aliens to access to such a system and the Regimes, past and present, who refuse to enforce Expedited Removal, and cases need to be dismissed so the EOIR can deal with a reasonable case load. 

No surprises, as the wholesale dismissal of cases by the Obama Regime has not impacted the EOIR burden.

TRAC March 13, 2013 
Immigration Court Backlog Reaches New High 
(13 Mar 2013) The number of cases awaiting resolution before the Immigration Courts has risen along with the average time these pending cases have been waiting. As of the end of February 2013, the backlog has reached a new all-time high of 325,296. 
According to the very latest data obtained and analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), that total rose by 1,571 just during February. 
The court backlog is now 9.3 percent higher than it was at the end of FY 2011 when ICE Director John Morton announced a review of cases designed to reduce both the backlog and wait times. Instead, the backlog has increased, and the average time cases have been waiting to be heard has jumped to 553 days, compared with 489 days at the end of FY 2011 when the review began.


It appears that one of the ostensible reasons for the Regime's lawlessness has been completely discredited and John Morton exposed as a liar.  Par for the course with the Regime though.

But on top of this failure, the agitators in the cadre of EOIR hearing officers is a assault on the Constitution.  Minor functionaries, following the Regime's example of contempt for the Constitution and the separation of powers between the Legislative and the Executive, have announced their own Administrative Amnesty.

San Antonio Express-News March 14, 2013 by Jason Buch 
Migrant Courts Get More Latitude 
With immigration courts still backlogged more than a year after the Obama administration launched a controversial policy to close certain deportation cases, the nation's top immigration judge has encouraged colleagues to take matters into their own hands. 
In a memo issued this month, Chief Immigration Judge Brian O'Leary wrote that judges are “encouraged to consider” a landmark ruling from last year that allows them to close deportation cases over the objection of prosecutors. 
The decision was hailed by immigration lawyers, who said it will help relieve heavy dockets of languishing cases. San Antonio had the second-largest backlog in the state with 10,000 cases pending last year. 
But a former immigration judge criticized the guidelines as sending the message that immigration laws won't be enforced, adding that administrative closure, which puts deportation proceedings on the shelf, leaves immigrants in legal limbo. 
The recommendation to consider closing cases despite the government's objection came in a memo in which O'Leary lamented the backlog in the nation's immigration courts.

This is all the more shocking since any case that remains after the Regime's wholesale dismissal of cases must be quite significant, but the Kritarch O'Leary is clearly seeking to make the EOIR a fourth branch of government, beyond the law and Constitution.  His ambition and thirst for power is readily apparent.  

But note that the Regime has not brought this minor functionary in the Department of Justice to heel, so it must be part of their ongoing Administrative Amnesty.  It is of interest that any objection in the story is from a retired immigration judge, not a Regime spokesman upset by the Constitutional overreach of a bureaucrat.

As if to signal their further contempt for the law, an immigration judge has decided that getting propositioned in the streets is now a basis for asylum in the United States.

ILW.com (The Treason Bar) March 15, 2013 by David Cleveland 
Immigration Judge Grants Asylum To a Woman from El Salvador Who Rebuffed Romance from a Gang Member 
Immigration Judge Amy C. Hoogasian granted asylum to a woman from El Salvador who refused to be the girlfriend of a MS-13 gang member, in a 16-page Decision dated November 7, 2012. 
“Women in El Salvador” is a cognizable particular social group, ruled the Judge. 
Facts 
In September 2009, respondent met a MS-13 gang member named El Crazy at a bus stop. She met him three more times that month. At first, El Crazy was merely forward and aggressive, as he asked her to be his girlfriend. But, as respondent kept on rejecting him, El Crazy became angry.* At their last meeting, he shouted “I’ll kill you.” 
Respondent did not report anything to the police, because “members of MS-13 are well-known for abusing and raping women, and the police do not help such women.” 
 Respondent fled El Salvador in October 2009, and testified in court in 2011.* She admitted that El Crazy did not know her name, nor where she lived.
Country conditions evidence 
The parties submitted “hundreds of pages of country conditions evidence.”The Immigration Judge found that the national police and the judiciary “suffered from inefficiency, corruption, political infighting, and insufficient resources.” 
 “Substantial corruption in the judiciary contributed to a high level of impunity…The criminal conviction rate was less than five percent.” Id. 
“Intimidation and killing of police officers, crime victims, and witnesses created a climate of fear complicating investigation of violent crime and alleged human rights abuses.” Id. at 7. 
“Additionally, street gang intimidation and violence against witnesses contributed to a climate of impunity from criminal prosecution.” Id. *Gang members “frequently utilize intimidation and violence against others and have been responsible for killings of police officers.” Id. at 14. 
“El Salvador has one of the highest murder rates in the world.” Id.at 7 [emphasis added].

All of interest especially since El Salvador's crime rate has declined 40%.  But despite El Salvador's murder rate of 71 per 100,000 it is still higher than Detroit's at 54 per 100,000.  However, having a high crime rate or a high rate of murder of police officers does not give any person the right to live in the United States. If that were so, then much of the world would have a right to live here.  And that does not give one any reasonable standard.  Don't men in El Salvador also have a right not to be murdered?  Does everyone in El Salvador have a right to asylum in the United States?  Doesn't everyone have a right not to be murdered.  That would make any murder rate anywhere a valid reason for asylum.  Essentially the immigration judge here, Hoogasian, has decided that she wants as many immigrants here as possible and will reach that conclusion in all cases, the law and Constitution be damned.

But, of course, it is not the facts of any particular case, or any social conditions, or any imagined social group.  

The point of this decision by the Kritarch Hoogasian, much like her Chief Kritarch O'Leary, is the claim of power, taking from the Legislative Branch that is responsible for making immigration law, and giving to the Executive, an assault on the Constitution and its separation of powers.  Hoogasian and O"Leary are contemptuous of the Constitution and seek to establish their own branch of government in violation of the Constitution.  All for the purpose of electing a new people.  A new people that will have a very high murder rate if we keep giving asylum to people from such violent societies.

It is time for impeachment.
 

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

The Administrative Amnesty Has Many Facets

The Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty has many facets, and one of those is the abuse of provisions of law and the legal process.  In this case the provision of waivers for illegal aliens who are living in the United States.  These waivers refer to the 3 and 10 year bars to those aliens who have lived various amounts of time in the United States unlawfully.  The 3 year bar is for those aliens who stayed illegally for less than one year and the 10 year bar is for those who have been in the U.S. for more than one year.

There is, however, a waiver for the bar.  And the standard for the waiver is extreme hardship for the petitioning U.S. citizen spouse or parent.  The law requires that the waiver be applied for at an American diplomatic post abroad and be adjudicated by the Department of State.

However, as reported by this blog, the lawless Obama Regime has flouted the law and has begun accepting applications for the waiver submitted by aliens currently living unlawfully in the United States and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is accepting and adjudicating those applications submitted on USCIS Form I-601, Application for Waiver of Grounds of Admissibility.

True to for, further information is coming out about the ongoing Waiver Amnesty concocted by the Obama Regime from the Treason Bar:

ILW.com March 8, 2013 by Alan Lee
Notes From The 2/26/13 U.S.C.I.S. Teleconference on I-601A Provisional Unlawful Presence Waivers

In an unprecedented move, the Regime has redefined the waiver law, where the hardship must be experienced by the petitioning U.S. citizen, and extended that to other U.S. citizen relatives of the petitioning U.S. citizen.  In this case USCIS stated that the grandparent of a petitioning U.S. citizen can be experiencing extreme hardship in place of the petitioning U.S. citizen.

Specifically they were confused as to whether parents qualify for the waiver - how a U. S. citizen petitioner could petition for his or her parent and have the parent gain an I-601A waiver since the child could not be a qualifying family member for the hardship finding (must be U. S. citizen parent or spouse). Clarification was given in an example in which the U. S. citizen child could petition on the I-130 for the parent, and the parent could show extreme hardship to the parent's U. S. citizen parent - in other words, the petitioner's grandparent. The answer illustrated the rule that the qualifying U. S. citizen for extreme hardship does not have to be the same person as the I-130 petitioner.

To facilitate illegal aliens, the whole process will be paperwork only, there will be no interviews of the illegal aliens or the petitioning U.S. citizen.  All petitions will be approved at a central office.  This is a process specifically designed to facilitate fraud.  The theory behind the waiver is that the petitioning U.S. citizen is wholely dependent on a spouse or child who is an illegal alien, such as some extreme mental or physical disability and the illegal alien must remain to care for the stricken U.S. citizen.  

The National Benefits Center (NBC) will review the applications and can send out Requests for Further Evidence (RFE's) if needed. The NBC will inform the National Visa Center (NVC) of I-601A receipt and decision. In the event of denial, applicants will only have the recourse of filing another waiver application.

That is the theory, but in practice USCIS will accept any lie and not interviewing the U.S. citizen and the alien face-to-face is purposefully designed to prevent information about possible fraud to come to the attention of the officer adjudicating the petition.  No reasonable decision can be reached without face-to-face interviews, so the adjudicators will be blindly adjudicating a piece of paper, not people.  It is the "Get To Yes" management imperative, which is approval, not denial, policy of any and all applications.

As further evidence of the fraud tolerant policy, the Department of State will be prohibited from reviewing the waivers for fraud indicators, which would in many cases become readily apparent when the alien and petitioner arrive at the American diplomatic post for their immigrant visa interview:

A questioner was also concerned that the extreme hardship finding by U.S.C.I.S. would be revisited at the consulate and whether applicants could rely upon the U.S.C.I.S. decision - to which the Department of State representative responded that only U.S.C.I.S. has authority to make a finding of extreme hardship and that is part of the I-601A adjudication; that consular officers have no authority to review I-601A adjudications.

There it is, defy the law and Congress and accommodate fraud.  The latest facet of the Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty.


Monday, March 4, 2013

The Walking Dead War On Whites

Typical for Hollywood and the Bolsheviks (Cultural Marxists for the sensitive, but I like to call them what they are.) who run the media, white is evil and black is beautiful, as well as brown.  True to form, the Walking Dead has nothing but hatred and contempt for white people.

At best one can be Rick, the now bordering on mentally ill leader of the "nice" group of survivors.  But generally whites are nothing but a the focus of evil in the Walking Dead universe.

The most recent, Episode 12, Clear, is illustrative of the point.  The episode starts with part of the group, Rick, his son Carl, and Michonne, heading out to Rick's hometown to scour it for guns.  On the way down the rural Georgia highway in their little Korean crossover they deliberately pass by another survivor, called on the blogs the Hitchhiker, which themselves are full of DWLs justifying the failure of the group to assist him.  At the conclusion of the episode we see the group leaving Rick's hometown and the Hitchhiker's body torn asunder by the Walking Dead.  But race traitor Rick stops only to steal the Hitchhiker's backpack.

To heap racial calumny upon shear evil, the rest of the episode centers around Rick's failures and mercy to a black man, a throw away character at the begining of the first episode, Morgan Jones, who saved Rick's life.  Quite the contrast.  Evil white man abandon's fellow white man to inevitable dismemberment and horrid death for no reason.  But further into the episode, Morgan first tries to kill our trio.  But Rick in his obvious racial guilt, stay's his son's hand, like the Angel Gabriel staying Abraham's hand.   

It is not just the borderline insane Rick that is a racial problem to the writers.  The Walking Dead is filled with hateful white people.  The Governor is of course the prime example.  The embodiment of every leftists psycho-sexual repressed fantasy and subject of their projection, what they see in every white man, in every white male heterosexual leader, the Adolph Hitler they fear lurking underneath every bed.  

Of course the evil white man started with the despicable Shane, a shallowly written character who's only truth was the problem of sexual competition between white males.  Left out though in the real sexual conflict in any post Apocalypse world is the sexual predation by black males directed at white, and specifically blonde, women, such as Beth and Andrea, who herself is the embodiment of betrayal for her intercourse with the Governor.

The show is just chock full of one-dimensional black characters, generous to a fault, but sacrificed like T-dog  (WTF, was he some sort of rapper?) or Tyreese black leader of the group expelled from the prison by Rick.  That guy was just all about can't we just get along.  A one-dimensional Rodney King without the drug problem.

Then we have Merle, the stock Hollywood redneck white supremacist  southerner, whom the left love to hate more than babies yet born, who dared to try to do to some illegal aliens in Episode 10 what Rick later did to a lone white man with no compunction.  However Merle's brother is evolving like a RINO on the race issue and protects the illegals.  

The only thing missing is a homosexual, but I am certain that will appear soon.

But there we have it, no program is safe from the War on Whites.