Tuesday, February 28, 2017

John Kelly Endorses The Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty

The Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), John Kelly, has adopted the Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty.  In a meeting with the Democrat governor of Virginia, Terry McAuliffe, also under criminal investigation, Kelly told McAuliffe that only criminal aliens will be deported, apparently contradicting his recent orders to his subordinates.

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe said Monday that he was personally assured by Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly that only illegal immigrants involved in a “criminal enterprise” will be deported from the U.S. under the Trump administration’s policies.
Mr. McAuliffe said Mr. Kelly “emphatically” assured him in a conversation on Sunday that only illegal immigrants who have been involved in a “criminal enterprise” would be deported.
“Secondly, he assured me that there will be no random [U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement] stops on the streets of the United States of America,” Mr. McAuliffe told reporters at a National Governors Association press conference.
“I was heartened to hear it,” said Mr. McAuliffe, a Democrat who chairs the NGA. “I want to know if that indeed is not the case that’s going on, but I do appreciate Secretary Kelly.”
“I said, ‘Can I leave this meeting … and say that there will be no deportations of any individuals in the United States of America unless they have been involved in a criminal enterprise?’ He said yes,” Mr. McAuliffe said.
[DHS Chief Assures Virginia Governor That Only Illegals In ‘Criminal Enterprises’ Will Be Deported, By David Sherfinski, The Washington Times, February 27, 2017]

This is the Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty in a nutshell; only certain criminals will be deported.  This confirms that John Kelly is no Joe Swing and should resign or be impeached.

There is no benefit for President Trump to go soft on immigration.  The Democrats and their illegal alien constituents will not vote for Trump, ever.  Any weakness will invite renewed attacks.  And the Democrats are already rubbing it in the nose of President Trump.  A very obese and annoying Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) illegal alien will give the Spanish language response to the Trump State of the Union speech.

If you want to understand the opposing camps in President Trump's America, watch his speech to Congress tonight — and then watch the Spanish-language response. Even if you don't speak Spanish, the message that Astrid Silva and Democrats are sending will be unmistakable.
Trump is expected to characterize unauthorized immigrants as violent criminals — he’s invited relatives of people killed by unauthorized immigrants to the speech, and he’s likely to highlight their stories (just as he did on the campaign trail) to make a case for cracking down on “bad hombres.”
Silva’s response is a chance for unauthorized immigrants to talk back.
She’s an activist and student, a resident of the US since she was a child. She’s a DREAMer — currently protected from deportation under a program that Trump could end at any time — and her parents are under immediate threat from the stepped-up immigration enforcement Trump put into place his first week in office.
[Activist And DREAMer Astrid Silva Is Delivering The Spanish-Language Response To Trump’s Congress Speech, by Dara Lind, Vox, February 28, 2017]

This is an insult directed at President Trump, as is Democrats bringing other illegal aliens and Muslim terrorist sympathizers to the speech.  They will do nothing to help Trump, but only demand and attack more.

Sunday, February 26, 2017

Lying Sheriff Sought To Aid Illegal Aliens

The new sheriff of Maricopa County, Paul Penzone, who's only concern seemed to be assisting illegal aliens to remain in the United States, has been forced to do the modified limited walk-back.  Penzone has a strange obsession with illegal aliens, and made that the primary concern of his administration. It was not improving law enforcement in Maricopa County, not aggressively serving outstanding warrants for criminals, but aiding illegal aliens.

Open Borders Fraud Paul Penzone

From his election website:

In November 2016, Paul Penzone defeated Joe Arpaio by nearly 13 points and immediately began to fulfill his campaign promise to renew, restore and refocus the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. Sheriff Penzone remains committed to modern, transparent and accountable public safety and fiscal management that ensures our county is among the safest in the nation.
[Penzone For Sheriff Website, undated]

There is no mention of illegal aliens, but the undercurrent of the campaign against America's Sheriff, Joe Arpaio, was that Penzone would be the illegal alien sheriff.  And Penzone did not waste time aiding his real constituents, illegal aliens.

PHOENIX - For years, immigrants being released from jails in Phoenix would routinely be kept locked up an extra couple days to give federal authorities time to check their immigration status and launch deportation proceedings.
It was a policy put in place by Sheriff Joe Arpaio and widely denounced by critics who cited it as a pattern of unfair treatment toward immigrants. Jail systems in other cities have also faced legal challenges contending it's unconstitutional to keep a person in jail after they're released on bail or complete their sentence.
The man who defeated Arpaio in the November election announced Friday night that he was doing away with the policy amid questions about its constitutionality. That means the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office will no longer keep immigrants past their release dates, putting more of the onus on Immigration, Customs and Enforcement officers.
"I have an obligation that this office act constitutionally and within the laws," Penzone said at a news conference.
Penzone said the Maricopa County Attorney's Office informed him of the legal issues surrounding policy, and he responded by doing away with the practice.
[Maricopa County Sheriff Paul Penzone Changes Jail Rule For Immigrants, AP/ABC15, February 17, 2017]

Penzone claims that it is settled law that detaining illegal aliens on behalf of DHS is unconstitutional. That is not settle law, and there have been no decisions in an Federal District Court in Arizona, nor has the Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals made any ruling on the issue.  There have been scattered decisions in some District Courts, but those do not have legal precedence for Arizona, especially since no Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court have made decisions.  More importantly, the Obama Department of Justice have not appealed those decisions, hoping to end detentions by local law enforcement by not appealing those decisions, part of the Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty. Obviously that will change with Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions.

So the claim that what Penzone strangely calls "courtesy holds" on illegal aliens are illegal or unconstitutional is not settled. So, there is no precedent against holds and all precedent is actually in favor or holds.   Furthermore, there is that strange terminology that Penzone uses, "courtesy holds." That is something new created by the radical left, much like "New Americans" or "Americans in waiting" to refer to illegal aliens.  It is Orwellian Newspeak at its worse, political language designed to obscure rather than inform.

In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defence of the indefensible … Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness … the great enemy of clear language is insincerity. Where there is a gap between one's real and one's declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms...
[Politics And The English Language, George Orwell, 1946]

The "courtesy holds" that Penzone refers to are legal acts by a component of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), using DHS Form I-247, Immigration Detainer, that establishes probable cause that the alien in question is in the United States unlawfully or otherwise subject to arrest by DHS. It is not a "courtesy," but a legal process that is part of the authority of immigration officers to arrest and detain illegal aliens without need to obtain an arrest warrant from a Federal judge or magistrate codified in Title 8, United States Code, Section 1357, Powers Of Immigration Officers:

(a) Powers without warrant: Any officer or employee of the Service authorized under regulations prescribed by the Attorney General shall have power without warrant—
(2) to arrest any alien who in his presence or view is entering or attempting to enter the United States in violation of any law or regulation made in pursuance of law regulating the admission, exclusion, expulsion, or removal of aliens, or to arrest any alien in the United States, if he has reason to believe that the alien so arrested is in the United States in violation of any such law or regulation and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained for his arrest, but the alien arrested shall be taken without unnecessary delay for examination before an officer of the Service having authority to examine aliens as to their right to enter or remain in the United States;

In an Orwellian abuse of political language, while he was releasing illegal aliens to prey on the people of Maricopa County and Arizona, Penzone cried that none of this was his fault, but begged John Kelly, Secretary of DHS to solve the problem for him by magic.

Maricopa County Sheriff Paul Penzone is asking for guidance from the director of the Department of Homeland Security about "courtesy detainers" for suspected immigration-law violators and other areas of immigration enforcement.
Penzone, in a letter sent Thursday afternoon to DHS Secretary John Kelly, said he wanted his agency to be strong on issues of crime, including illegal immigration, but said, "I will not violate the law or the constitution so the ends justify the means."
On Friday, Penzone ended the longstanding practice of "courtesy holds" on the advice of the Maricopa County Attorney's Office. Because of a threat of litigation, Penzone said, the county jails immediately would end the practice of detaining suspected immigration-law violators for ICE officials for up to 48 hours after a criminal court judge had ordered their release on a state charge.
[Penzone To Homeland Security: Give Me A 'Responsible, Ethical And Legal Solution' On Holding Migrants, by Garrett Mitchell, The Arizona Republic, February 23, 2017]

Those, of course, are nothing more than crocodile tears.  Penzone wanted to release illegal aliens, but he was under no legal obligation to do so.  And his appeals to Kelly were disingenuous.  One would think that a Sheriff would know that the appeal of decisions of law involving the United States are handled by the Attorney General.  In any event though, Penzone did not even bother to review the detainers themselves, which showed the constitutional standard to hold a person, probable cause, was met.  

But he did expose the fact that both AG Sessions and Secretary Kelly are stunningly silent on the issue.  Neither has spoken in public to assert that detainers are legal, nor has Sessions immediately ordered Justice Department lawyers to appeal the outstanding cases. Very disturbing indeed.

However, the outcry from the public forced Penzone into the modified limited walkback.

Maricopa County Sheriff Paul Penzone said Friday evening his agency would begin transferring departing inmates potentially in violation of U.S. immigration law to federal officers within the walls of the county's jails.
The announcement settles the main point of contention in a week long stalemate between the Sheriff’s Office and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
[Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Reverses Course, Will Allow ICE Agents To Pick Up Migrants Inside Jails, by Megan Cassidy, The Arizona Republic, February 24, 2017]

The success of public pressure on this open borders fanatic however does not relieve the ongoing failure of Secretary Kelly to begin to address the problem of illegal immigration and criminal aliens in particular, nor does it relieve Attorney General Sessions of his responsibility to publicly address the issue with a firm statement that detainers are legal and constitutional.

Friday, February 24, 2017

More Saboteurs At USCIS Identified

The influence of VDare, like its readership, is growing and expanding. VDare and this writer have apparently been on the reading lists of influential persons in the Trump Administration.  The mainstream media has also take the cue from the pioneering work at VDare.  Breitbart has dug into the treasonous bureaucracy at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and identified more saboteurs, something this blog revealed in two important posts [President Trump Will Have Foes In Immigration Bureaucracy—But Also Friends. They Can Help Him Win, by Federale, VDare, April 25, 2017 and Treason and Sabotage: Immigration Bureaucrats Acted To Protect San Bernardino Terrorists, by Federale, VDare, July 5, 2016].  Breitbart ups the ante, and identifies major figures in the USCIS bureaucracy who are and will sabotage the Trump reforms at DHS.

Sources tell Breitbart News that the Department of Homeland Security, and in particular U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services [USCIS], is a hotbed of career open borders ideologues, many of whom intend to directly and indirectly subvert President Trump’s agenda.
“If you go down the list of current management at USCIS, probably 80 percent are open-borders left-wing ideologues,” a source, who has worked at the Department of Homeland Security for more than a decade and supports President Trump’s agenda, tells Breitbart News.
“USCIS probably has the most violent anti-border people in the United States. These are in the management. These do not believe in borders. I know them personally,” the source says.
“I am deeply concerned President Trump will not clean the deepest swamp, USCIS,” the source says:
[8 More Obama Bureaucrats Trump Can Fire Or Remove At Homeland Security, by Michael Leahy, Breitbart, February 22, 2017]

This writer disagrees with Leahy on one aspect of the report.  While Lori Scialabba is indeed a major supporter of illegal aliens, refugees, and immigration fraud, the article is incorrect in claiming that the memorandum she wrote was sabotage of the Trump Executive orders.  Nothing in the Trump orders regarding the suspension of entry of aliens from the seven identified nations affected domestic adjudications of benefits.  While this writer believes that the orders targeting entry by aliens from the targeted nations should have included more nations and included adjudications in the United States, the Trump Administration did not do that.

However, Leahy is otherwise quite correct on Scialabba, which I have confirmed with sources, especially her personal involvement in adjudications of applications for refugee or asylee status by individual Iraqi nationals and others.  Such is unethical and highly improper, as well as suggestive of fraud and bribery, not an uncommon problem at USCIS.

In her previous position at USCIS, Director of Refugee Asylum and International Operations, “it was common knowledge that her email was directly available to anyone in the Iraqi community who wanted to apply for asylum,” the source adds.
“Iraqis that come into the country on visas were applying for asylum right away. Their cases would be denied because they didn’t qualify, they didn’t meet any of the five grounds for asylum. They didn’t have well founded fear, they weren’t persecuted,” the source notes.
“Any Iraqi that was denied asylum, they would email Scialabba directly. She would email her subordinates at the local offices, and those cases would be re-opened and approved, basically to please her,” the source said.

More disturbing is that the Treason Bar has direct influence over her.  Such direct appeals are illegal, as an denials have a formal process to go through:

One attorney in one of the eight cities where local asylum approval officers were located appeared to have a direct line to Sciallabba as well. Iraqi immigrants would flock to that city because that particular lawyer, working through the local USCIS office, had a virtual 100 percent record of securing asylum approvals for Iraqis.

Lori Scialabba, Who Ran A Personal Asylum Application System for Iraqi Muslims

Here is the correct appeals system:

Q.  Can I do anything about an unfavorable decision issued by USCIS?
A.  Yes, you may file an appeal on some unfavorable decisions to the USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) or the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), an office within the Department of Justice.  Your denial notice will provide information about whether the decision may be appealed and where to file your appeal.
With certain exceptions, you may file a motion to reopen or motion to reconsider if you received an unfavorable decision in your case.  You may file a motion with USCIS even if you do not have any appeal rights.  You may also file a motion regarding a decision made on an appeal...
Q.  How do I file an appeal?
A.  Most appeals are filed on Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, but there are some exceptions.  Appeals of decisions on an N-400, Application for Naturalization, are made on Form N-336, Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings.  Appeals of decisions on an I-130, Petition for Alien Relative, or other decisions that are appealed to the BIA, are filed on Form EOIR-29, Notice of Appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals from a Decision of a DHS Officer, with the office that made the decision on the petition.  When you are notified of an unfavorable decision that may be appealed, you will also receive information about which form you should use to appeal the decision. 
Q.  When do I file an appeal?
A.  Generally, an appeal should be filed within 30 days from the date of the decision (not the date the decision was received).  A shorter appeal period may apply to some cases.  Your decision will tell you when the appeal period ends.  There is no extension to this deadline.  Only a brief to support a filed appeal may be submitted after the deadline.
[Questions and Answers: Appeals and Motions, USCIS Website]

Direct appeals to managers without filing the proper forms is illegal and serious misconduct by any official who participates in such an "informal" appeal process.  Such misconduct can be reported to the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General here.

You can also ask Inspector General John Roth as to the status of the DHS OIG investigation of Irene Martin, a senior USCIS manager, and the other women managers at USCIS who acted to sabotage the investigation of the San Bernardino Terrorists, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik.

USCIS and its bureaucrats will do all they can to sabotage President Trump. Time for him to replace their upper management with patriots from the enforcement components of USCIS as this writer has recommended, along with other recommendations on how to reform USCIS.

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Trump Administration Follows VDare And Federale

It appears that someone in the Trump Administration is reading VDare and Federale.  Again, the Trump Administration has taken sound advice, in this case after reading my posting on fighting the interference by the kritarchs on refugee policy, the Administration sent out orders to give refugees the bureaucratic slowdown.  

The would-be dictatorial kritarchs who are waging war on the Constitution and President Donald J. Trump think they have the upper hand.  However, President Trump has additional action he can take to stop refugees coming to the United States.  It is one of the options this writer recommended to clip the wings of the subversive bureaucrats at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and by extension, the saboteurs at the State Department...
All President Trump needs to do is withdraw all the USCIS employees stationed overseas, in luxurious conditions at most posts, other than those assigned to investigate immigration benefit fraud.  Those employees are from the Fraud and National Security Directorate.
Once the employees who process refugees are withdrawn, then State Department employees overseas who support refugee processing can also be withdrawn from those Embassies and Consulates that assist refugee processing.  All this can be done administratively and will end the long-term flow of refugees.
[Trump’s Options In The Refugee War With The Kritarchs–The Executive Branch Can Refuse To Process The Refugees, by Federale, VDare, February 16, 2017]

And acting on good advice, the Trump Administration has ordered State Department officials to slow walk refugee applications!  Note, this was originally posted on the Federale Blog February 15, 2017.

The U.S. State Department has ordered embassies to slow resettlement of refugees for the next few weeks and delay booking travel for refugees after March 3 as the numbers approach the annual cap of 50,000 set recently by President Donald Trump, according to American officials.
U.S. officials from embassies in the Middle East said they received a directive Tuesday from the State Department’s Population, Refugee and Migration bureau to delay booking travel to the U.S. for refugees awaiting final resettlement after March 3. The directive said the numbers of refugees already admitted is close to Mr. Trump’s cap for 2017.
[U.S. Orders Slowdown of Refugee Resettlements, by By Maria Abi-Habib, WSJ, February 16, 2017] Full article here for those without a subscription.

While it might have been too little time between my post and the action by the State Department, great minds do think alike.  Someone in the State Department does not hate America.  That is great news.

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Yes, We Want A Panic!

It again appears that John Kelly, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), is in over his head.  Kelly recently signed and released two memorandum regarding immigration law enforcement policy.  Overall the memorandum reverse the Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty, except in one major area, the Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals (DACA) illegal aliens, a major ongoing blunder by President Trump.  Overall though, the memorandum put meat back on the table for DHS enforcement components.

First, the memorandums. The two memorandums effectively withdraw the infamous Morton Memos that ended interior immigration enforcement in the United States.  All illegal aliens are subject to arrest.  And I can confirm that in the run up to these memorandum, collateral arrests by enforcement components, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) have been making collateral arrests during enforcement actions, which is the arrest of random illegal aliens encountered while searching for other illegal aliens.  Such was prohibited under Barack Hussein Obama and the infamous John Morton.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is greatly expanding the number of people living in the U.S. illegally who are considered a priority for deportation, including people arrested for traffic violations, according to agency documents released Tuesday.
The documents represent a sweeping rewrite of the nation's immigration enforcement priorities.
The Homeland Security Department memos, signed by Secretary John Kelly, lay out that any immigrant living in the United States illegally who has been charged or convicted of any crime — and even those suspected of a crime — will now be an enforcement priority. That could include people arrested for shop lifting or minor traffic offenses.
[US To Expand Pool Of People Targeted For Deportation, Alicia Caldwell, Yahoo/Associated Press, February 21, 2017]

And in a bit of press virtue signally, Caldwell calls for the Treason Bar and Mexico to interfere with the border security plan to force asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for their hearings:

Kelly's memo also describes plans to enforce a long-standing but obscure provision of the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act that allows the government to send some people caught illegally crossing the Mexican border back to Mexico, regardless of where they are from. One of the memos says that foreigners sent back to Mexico would wait for their U.S. deportation proceedings to be complete. This would be used for people who aren't considered a threat to cross the border illegally again, the memo said.
It's unclear whether the United States has the authority to force Mexico to accept foreigners. That provision is almost certain to face opposition from civil libertarians and officials in Mexico.

As I pointed out in an earlier post, Mexico can try and interfere with this plan, but America has options if Mexico refuses to accept back asylum seekers or Mexican nationals:

And if the Mexican government wants to play hardball, the U.S. can shut down the border, as it did when Mexican officials were slow to find abducted DEA Special Agent Kiki Camarena.
[In The Streets And The Courts, The Left Plans A Coup. But Trump Can Fight Back, by Federale, VDare, February 14, 2017]

However, as soon as the new enforcement memos were released, saboteurs in DHS were meeting with the Lying Press to advise illegal aliens not to self-deport:

The Trump administration sought to allay fears in immigrant communities Tuesday as it publicly released wide-ranging new guidelines that allow federal authorities to take stronger enforcement actions against illegal immigrants, saying the directives are not intended to produce mass deportations.
Federal officials cautioned that many of the changes detailed in a pair of memos signed by Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly will take time to implement and that other policies that grant agents and officers greater powers will be used with care and discretion.
[Trump Administration Seeks To Prevent ‘Panic’ Over New Immigration Enforcement Policies, by David Nakamura, WaPo, February 21, 2017]

While these new announcements had the capacity in and of themselves to create panic, and subsequent self-deportation, some un-named DHS official did not want illegal aliens to self-deport:

“We do not need a sense of panic in the communities,” a DHS official said in a conference call with reporters to formally release the memos to the public.
“We do not have the personnel, time or resources to go into communities and round up people and do all kinds of mass throwing folks on buses. That’s entirely a figment of folks’ imagination,” said the official, who was joined on the call by two others, all of whom spoke on condition of anonymity to answer questions. “This is not intended to produce mass roundups, mass deportations.”

Again, while it is true that not all illegal aliens can be deported, one of the purposes of enforcement action is to discourage illegal immigration and to cause illegal aliens to fear arrest and formal removal, then thereby leave on their own volition.  Why this un-named official won't go public is interesting and suggests he or she is a saboteur.

The reporter Nakamura has an interesting tweet on the briefing:

Despite this being an apparently official briefing for the press, and not the usual "un-named source," reportage, Nakamura refuses to identify that official.  It appears Nakamura and the WaPo are playing the Washington insider game; in this case Nakamura and others in the press are attempting to influence policy rather than reporting news.  And they are surprised on why people think they are the Lugenpresse.

Contact Nakamura here and ask him why the name of an official briefer on a conference call for large numbers of press officials was not named.

For immigration enforcement to work, as with Operation Wetback, half of those who leave do so out of fear, fear of being arrested and deported.  The Trump Administration needs to realize that.

Sunday, February 19, 2017

Stanford Wages War On Alumnun And Free Speech

It should come as no surprise that Stanford has followed the University at California, Berkeley (UCB), in suppressing free speech, and insulting a distinguished alumnus as well.   Just as VDare's conference was cancelled at Tenya Lodge in Yosemite, illegally by the way as Tenya Lodge is a Federal contractor and on Federal property, so did Stanford University, who once thought they were superior to UCB in academics and sports.  But Stanford has been reduced to the also ran to UCB's virulent Cultural Marxism.

Stanford though thinks too much of itself.  It is nothing but the obedient servant of radicals like Jesse Jackson who shut down Western Civilization studies at Stanford and the purile student body recently voted not to bring back Western Civilization.

And this just in – VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow’s alma mater, Stanford’s  Graduate School Of Business, just cancelled a debate between Brimelow and Tim Kane of the Hoover Institution to be held by the Stanford chapter of the  Adam Smith Society, citing the destruction of Berkeley as the reason they’ve been scared off.
[VDARE.com Conference Cancellation Update: Two Rays Of Hope!, Lydia Brimelow, VDare, February 6, 2017]

This is an example of the heckler's veto, or more accurately the terrorists' veto of freedom of speech.  But just as the Terrorist Veto of the speech at UCB by Milo  Yiannopoulos was not so much a Terrorist Veto, but a conspiracy between the terrorists and the UCB administration and the lesbian university police chief to use the threat of violence or violence that was allowed by inaction to occur to squash Milo's speech, so the administrators at Stanford did the same.

But just as the UCB Police allowed the violence in Berkeley to happen, and had the resources to quash to violence quickly and effectively, so the Stanford Department of Public Safety (DPS), a private police department, an accredited and authorized law enforcement authority deputized as Santa Clara County Deputy Sheriffs, but could have easily quashed any violence or provided the necessary security, especially given the Department's bragging about their skill and abilities for presidential visits and major events at the 50,0000 capacity Stanford Stadium.

Braggart Chief Laura Wilson, Stanford DPS Suspiciously Like Another Chief of Police

So, Jonathan Levin's claim that Stanford could not provide security is a lie.  I know this because I worked with the Stanford DPS before, and they can get the job done. And bring a world of hurt on rioters if necessary.  And Stanford could easily forestall any riots or violence by letting students know before hand that such activity would violate the Honor Code and result in expulsion.

Saturday, February 18, 2017

Deputize The National Guard To Arrest Illegals?

Why not?  The leaked plan to train and deploy National Guard troops from 11 States to hunt down and arrest illegal aliens was a excellent idea.  While it would have been controversial, the plan would have immediately added thousands of immigration agents to the field to begin deporting the 11-30 million illegal aliens in the United States.

President Trump may mobilize as many as 100,000 National Guard troops to round up illegal immigrants, according to a new report — though the White House immediately called it “false.”
The Associated Press said it obtained a draft memo that outlines a Trump administration proposal under consideration to mobilize troops in 11 states to round up unauthorized immigrants.
According to the wire service, the 11-page document calls for the unprecedented militarization of immigration enforcement as far north as Portland, Oregon, and as far east as New Orleans, Louisiana.
[Trump Team Considers Deploying National Guard For Immigrant Roundup, By Daniel Halper and Bob Fredericks, New York Post, February 17, 2017]

This was something that should have appealed to President Trump.  It is innovative, cost-effective, and would produce results.  Deploying 100,000 immigration officers to the field would have been a game-changer for immigration enforcement.  It would have been something along the lines of Operation Wetback, effectively deporting a million or so illegal aliens within one year, and causing another million or so to self-deport.  Continuing the program over one year would have had a cascading effect, as one or more family members were deported, the rest of the family, usually wives and dependent children, would be forced to leave as their primary breadwinner was deported and with the certain knowledge that the streets are being combed for them as well, they would have self-deported, with most illegals removed from the United States within 4 years.

This would have worked.  The real question is why this did not get to Trump and who quashed it.

Of real interest is that apparently someone in the Department of Homeland Security is reading VDare and Federale.  Other provisions of the memorandum call for expanding Expedited Removal and forcing asylum applicants to remain in Mexico pending their hearings!

Saboteurs Even In The Border Patrol

Reports are out that not everyone in DHS is on board with the new policies enunciated by President Trump.  I predicted resistance, but not from certain parts of the immigration bureaucracy.  It is no surprise to me that there is resistance to the new regime in the U. S. Border Patrol (USBP).  Every organization has its malcontents, and the USBP, despite its authentic and powerful esprit de corps, is no exception. However, I am certain The Resistance, as the Democrats are styling themselves, is small and ineffectual, at least in the USBP.  In any event, they can be smoked out quite easily.

Some border patrol stations have been slow to carry out President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement executive order and instead have continued former President Barack Obama’s “catch-and-release” policies, according to a union official.
Brandon Judd, president of the National Border Patrol Council, told LifeZette that he raised concerns Thursday with U.S. Border Patrol Chief Ronald Vitiello. He said he is confident that issue soon will be corrected.
But Judd said as recently as Thursday, some border patrol stations were still releasing border-jumpers, often without even issuing notices to appear in immigration court hearings. Obama’s policy was to release anyone claiming to have been living continuously in the United States since before Jan. 1, 2014, if they did not have criminal records or active warrants.
[Exclusive: Few Rogue Border Agents Resist Trump Policies, by Brendan Kirby, Lifezette, February 17, 2017]

Frankly though, I did not expect such flagrant insubordination from USBP managers.  While 8 years of Obama did do damage to the USBP, most of the problem was in higher management at headquarters in DC, as exemplified by the rogue appointment of Mark Morgan as the shortest lived Chief of the USBP.  And betrayal is not uncommon at the head of the USBP; David Aguilar was a former Chief, but despised by the rank and file because of his support for amnesty, but he, like Morgan, was a political appointment, but under the much despised Jorge Bush.

So there is a small cadre of America hating agents in the management of the USBP, mostly a segment of the Hispanic presence in the USBP.  Not to denigrate Hispanic USBP agents, but generally, those who oppose the USBP mission are Hispanic, women, Blacks, or homosexuals.  And are also more likely to be corrupt, much more likely than the quintessential white Border Patrol Agent (BPA), like Bill Jordan.  Not to denigrate at all the many Hispanic BPAs who serve aggressively and honorably, like Jose Compean and Ignacio Ramos.

I can say from 25 years in Federal law enforcement, there are quite a few time servers and lazy Democrats in the Service who are not committed to mission in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), especially in U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), a problem child, of which I have written on the issue of disciplining them and their sabotage of immigration enforcement.

And I would like to ask National Border Patrol Council President Brandon Judd to forward the names and the Stations of those Chief Patrol Agents (CPA) who are refusing to implement President Trump's orders, so those CPAs can get the publicity they so richly deserve.  Please contact me or VDare directly.

You can also contact the Chief of the United States Border Patrol, Ronald Vitiello, directly via Twitter at @USBPChief, and ask what he is doing about this insubordination.  Sorry, no email.

Remember, sunlight is the best disinfectant!

Thursday, February 16, 2017

Warning For President Trump: Kritarchs Looking To Impose DACA

The challenge by the radical left kritarchs to the Trump immigration enforcement plan continues and the latest plan is for the courts to impose a permanent Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals (DACA) amnesty on the nation, in the same manner that abortion and homosexual marriage was imposed on an unwilling nation, in order to elect a new people and replace the historic American nation.  With the unconstitutional actions by another Washington kritarch and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal thwarting attempts to control widespread Muslim immigrant terrorists uncontested by the Trump Administration, the left smells blood in the water, and is acting to make DACA a permanent judicial amnesty.

The recent arrest of gangbanger Daniel Ramirez Medina, also known as the Rat, in Washington State by Deportation Officers of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) has become the vector for imposition of DACA on the Trump Administration.

Daniel Ramirez Medina, Known As The Rat To Fellow Gangbangers In The Paisas Gang

A 23-year-old man who was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agents in Seattle on Feb. 10 says his constitutional rights have been violated, and he is suing the U.S. government for his release.
Daniel Ramirez Medina, who is currently being held by immigration authorities in Tacoma, Wash., is registered with the U.S. government under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program.
His appears to be the first arrest by ICE of a DACA recipient. A federal judge in Seattle has scheduled a hearing in the case for Friday.
[DACA Recipient Sues U.S. Government After He Is Detained By Immigration Authorities, by Rebecca Hersher, NPR, February 15, 2017]

The Treason Bar shysters representing Medina base their demand for his release on the claim that DACA is permanent and a promise by the United States not to deport DACA beneficiaries.

Petitioner Daniel Ramirez Medina (“Mr. Ramirez”) is a law-abiding young father who has twice been granted deferred action and an employment authorization card under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) program established by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”). Because he satisfied the specific and rigorous criteria set out by DHS under the DACA program (and indeed satisfied them again when his DACA status was renewed), he is authorized by DHS to live and work in the United States. But despite complying with all of the requirements of the DACA program, Mr. Ramirez was taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) – part of DHS – on Friday, February 10, 2017, and is being presently detained without justification. Mr. Ramirez’s detention breaks the promise made to him under the well-established framework of the DACA program, violates his reasonable expectations based on the DACA program, and violates his rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
[Daniel Ramirez Medina, Petitioner, v. U.S. Department Of Homeland Security, Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus, U.S. District Court For the Western District of Washington, February 13, 2017]

Then the Treason Bar claims ICE must release illegal aliens because they arrested and released DACA beneficiaries previously.

The court complaint also addresses the seeming failure of a stopgap measure — a 24/7 law enforcement hotline that DACA recipients are instructed to call if they find themselves incorrectly detained by immigration authorities, as the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website explains.
But "when Mr. Ramirez's counsel called the hotline, he was provided no assistance in remedying the mistake that had been made by the arresting ICE agents," the complaint states.

Summarized, the Treason Bar says DACA is permanent and said benefits cannot be reviewed or revoked by the United States.  It is if a work permit that itself says is revocable is some sort of holy writ, or a transit letter signed by General de Gaulle.

Importantly, the Treason Bar, usually the dregs of the law profession, are backed by prestigious white-shoe law firms.

Ramirez’s lawyers deny that he has any gang involvement — instead, lawyer Ethan Dettmer told Reuters that ICE agents “repeatedly pressured” Ramirez “to falsely admit” gang affiliation. Dettmer, it’s worth noting, is a partner at the major law firm Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, whose partners include former US Solicitor General Ted Olson and a lawyer who was rumored to be on the shortlist to head the Securities and Exchange Commission under Trump — which should give you a sense of how seriously advocates are taking this case.
[Daniel Ramirez Medina: What We Know About The DREAMer [sic] Trump Is Trying To Deport, by Dara Lind, Vox, February 16, 2017]

This is reflextive of the importance that the Cultural Marxists place on this gangbanger and their plan to spring an Roe v. Wade or Obergefell v. Hodges via the kritarchs.

And a gangbanger he is:

According to the federal government, ICE agents questioned Ramirez about gang affiliations, including a “gang tattoo” on his arm. Ramirez answered that he wasn’t involved in gang activity “no more,” and had “fled California to escape from the gangs,” but that he “still hangs out with the Paizas [sic] in Washington State.”

The Paisas Gang is not a well-known Hispanic gang unlike the well known MS-13, the Mexican Mafia, Nuestra Familia, Nortenos, and Surenos, but a powerful and dangerous gang despite it running under the radar of popular knowledge, but the Paisas do have a Facebook page.

It is disappointing that Attorney General Sessions has been MIA in the current fight with the kritarchs.  He apparently does not know that the Treason Bar is like the Terminator, they never stop until America is dead or they are put down.  And Ramirez needs to be put down, or deported to Mexico.  Otherwise we will lose our historic American nation to the kritarchs and Third World illegal aliens.

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

President Trump Has Options In The Refugee War With The Kritarchs

The would-be dictatorial kritarchs who are waging war on the Constitution and President Donald J. Trump think they have the upper hand.  President Trump though has additional action he can take to stop refugees coming to the United States.  It is one of the options this writer recommended to clip the wings of the subversive bureaucrats at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and by extension, the saboteurs at the State Department.

Canberra, Australia (AP) -- U.S. officials stopped screening refugees held on Nauru for potential resettlement in the United States this week but will return to the Pacific atoll to continue working toward a deal that President Donald Trump has condemned as "dumb," an Australian minister said Thursday.
Immigration Minister Peter Dutton would not say when U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials would return to Nauru to conduct what Trump describes as "extreme vetting."
[U.S. Officials Stop Vetting Nauru Refugees for Resettlement, by Rod McGuirk, AP/Bloomberg, February 8, 2017]

What the ill-informed reporter McGuirk doesn't report and probably doesn't know is that it is USCIS employees who are sent overseas to process refugees.  And the fact that President Trump had those employees sent home is the key to thwarting the kritarchs.

All President Trump needs to do is withdraw all the USCIS employees stationed overseas, in luxurious conditions at most posts, other than those assigned to investigate immigration benefit fraud.  Those employees are from the Fraud and National Security Directorate.  Once the employees who process refugees are withdrawn, then State Department employees overseas who support refugee processing can also be withdrawn from those Embassies and Consulates that assist refugee processing.  All this can be done administratively and will end the long-term flow of refugees.

President Trump, Si Te Puede!

Muslim Refugee Potential Terrorists In Nauru

We don't want or need these people.

Monday, February 13, 2017

John Kelly, You're No Jumpin' Joe Swing

John Kelly, the new Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is more and more appearing to be either out of his depth or not committed to enforcing the immigration laws of the United States.

John Kelly, Not Jumpin' Joe Swing

When America was overrun with illegal aliens in the 1950s, President Dwight D. Eisenhower called upon a former subordinate during the Second World War, General Jumpin' Jose Swing, an aggressive paratroop commander to purge the corrupt and incompetent Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and aggressively enforce American immigration law.  The result was the deportation of millions of illegal aliens and millions more illegal aliens fleeing back to Mexico during Operation Wetback.

Jumpin' Joe Swing, Not Afraid To Frighten Illegal Aliens

Secretary Kelly appears to be either ignorant of major issues in immigration enforcement or deliberately ignoring those issues, and playing a game of pretend immigration enforcement.

First, despite the President speaking forcefully and in detail about sanctuary cities, Secretary Kelly claimed he doesn't even know what sanctuary cities are:

SAN DIEGO — U.S. Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly told law enforcement officials on a tour of nation’s border with Mexico Friday that he couldn’t define a sanctuary city, which President Donald Trump has targeted for withdrawal of federal funding for refusing to cooperate with immigration authorities.
Trump’s executive order on immigration last month says a “sanctuary jurisdiction” defies federal law by shielding people in the country illegally and that they have caused “immeasurable harm to the American people and to the very fabric of our Republic.”
While sanctuary cities are broadly understood to mean a refusal to cooperate with the federal government on immigration enforcement, a precise definition has eluded many, including in law enforcement.
“I don’t have a clue,” Kelly told San Diego Police Chief Shelley Zimmerman when she asked for a definition.
[Homeland Security Head Is Pressed To Define ‘Sanctuary City’, by By Elliot Spagat, WaPo/AP February 11, 2017]

Worse yet, Secretary Kelly appears to be apologizing for and minimizing the recent raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO):

U.S. Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said the operations, conducted in at least a dozen states, were routine and consistent with regular operations carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE.

[Over 680 Arrested In U.S. Immigration Raids; Rights Groups Alarmed, By Julia Edwards Ainsley and Kristina Cooke, Reuters, February 13, 2017]

Kelly appears ashamed of the work that his Deportation Officers and Immigration Enforcement Agents are doing.  Instead of highlighting the arrests as the begining of the deportation of millions, Kelly downplayed the arrests as normal, echoing other statements by spokesmen that all the arrests were routine and foolishly denying that ICE was conducting raids and roadblocks, instead insisting on the mealy mouthed term "targeted enforcement operations."

WASHINGTON – Last week, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) launched a series of targeted enforcement operations across the country. These operations targeted public safety threats, such as convicted criminal aliens and gang members, as well as individuals who have violated our nation’s immigration laws, including those who illegally re-entered the country after being removed and immigration fugitives ordered removed by federal immigration judges.
ICE officers in the Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, San Antonio and New York City areas of responsibility arrested more than 680 individuals who pose a threat to public safety, border security or the integrity of our nation’s immigration system. Of those arrested, approximately 75 percent were criminal aliens, convicted of crimes including, but not limited to, homicide, aggravated sexual abuse, sexual assault of a minor, lewd and lascivious acts with a child, indecent liberties with a minor, drug trafficking, battery, assault, DUI and weapons charges.
ICE conducts these kind of targeted enforcement operations regularly and has for many years.
The focus of these enforcement operations is consistent with the routine, targeted arrests carried out by ICE’s Fugitive Operations teams on a daily basis.
[Statement From Secretary Kelly On Recent ICE Enforcement Actions, Press Release, DHS, February 13, 2017]

David Marin, Field Office Director, ICE ERO, Los Angeles District Office, even went so far as to vigorously deny raids and roadblocks, trying to assuage illegal aliens that there will be few arrests, despite the Presidential target of removing 3 million illegal aliens in the first two years of his presidency.  There is no way that ICE will deport 3 million illegal alien criminals if the Los Angeles District can only arrest 160 illegal aliens, in a region where there are 1 million or so illegal aliens in Los Angeles and Orange Counties alone.

“The rash of these recent reports about ICE checkpoints and random sweeps and the like, it’s all false, and that’s definitely dangerous and irresponsible,” Marin said. “Reports like that create panic, and they put communities and law enforcement personnel in unnecessary danger.”
[ICE Says L.A. Immigration Arrests Were Planned Long In Advance, Not Tied To New Crackdown, by James Queally, LAT, February 10, 2017]

Even if these "targeted enforcement operations" were already planned, saying so to avert "panic" among illegal aliens is foolish, as it does not encourage those illegal aliens not arrested to flee back to Mexico as Operation Wetback and Jumpin' Joe Swing did.  It is correct to point out that the majority of illegal aliens cannot be arrested given enforcement resources, so they must be encouraged to self-deport, which was a major part of the Operation Wetback strategy.

Kris Kobach, Immigration Patriot

It appears that Kelly has been captured by the Obama policy of not encouraging illegal aliens to leave the United States.  Oh, how immigration patriots should mourn the failure of Kris Koback to be nominated as DHS Secretary.

Sunday, February 12, 2017

Illegal Aliens Conveniently Concentrated In A Few Urban Areas

In a bit a good news amidst the problems with the Presidential Orders on stopping the entry of terrorists, recent news shows that illegal aliens are concentrated in a few urban Democrat areas of the United States.  This places the illegal alien problem squarely in the lap of the Democrats and effectively immunizes President Donald J. Trump from any political fallout from widespread and aggressive immigration enforcement actions.

Over 60 percent of the 11.1 million undocumented immigrants in the United States are concentrated in just 20 major metropolitan areas, a far higher proportion than U.S. residents as a whole who live in urban areas, according to a Pew Research Center report released Thursday.
In 2014, these 20 metro areas were home to 6.8 million, or 61 percent, of the nation’s undocumented immigrants, compared to 36 percent of the total U.S. population, the report said. The concentrations of undocumented immigrants in urban areas mirror that of lawful immigrants, 65 percent of whom also live in these 20 metropolitan areas.
Earlier analyses have found undocumented immigrants to be concentrated in California, Texas, Florida, New York, New Jersey and Illinois. The numbers released Thursday reflect these statewide results, but give a more granular picture.
The flocking of undocumented immigrants to metropolitan areas belies the image of undocumented immigrants as employed in typically rural jobs, such as agriculture.
[Most Unauthorized Immigrants Live In Urban Areas, Study Shows, by Tara Bahrampour, February 9, 2017]

This opens up political jujitsu in enforcement options for President Trump, without having to fight the Agricultural Slave Power in predominantly rural Republican States.  While I support removing all illegal aliens, the battle for the Historic American Nation must be fought wisely.  Purge the cities first, then when the Cultural Marxists are defeated, then move on the Agricultural Slave Power and force them to hire Americans by raising wages.

As an example, just two counties in Democrat dominated California have over 1 million illegal aliens alone!

The chatter of Spanish serves as the backdrop of Pico-Union, where the aroma of pastries from the panaderia merge with the synthetic smells of an auto repair garage. A predominantly Latino neighborhood, it has for decades been a first stop for immigrants — both legal and illegal — coming from various corners of Latin America.
Over the years, this community has faced challenges, including from politicians threatening crackdowns on illegal immigration. But to many in this densely populated area near MacArthur Park, the presidency of Donald Trump poses a threat of an altogether different scale. Trump has vowed mass deportations of those here illegally, which if carried out, could fundamentally alter the rhythms of life in Pico-Union and numerous other immigrant enclaves around Southern California and beyond...
Nearly 10% of the nation’s 11.1 million immigrants who are in the country illegally reside in Los Angeles and Orange counties, according to the research center. The region is home to 1 million such immigrants, second only to the greater New York area, which has 1.2 million. Third on the list was Houston with 575,000. The city of Los Angeles alone has an estimated 375,000.
[L.A., Orange Counties Are Home To 1 Million Immigrants Who Are In The Country Illegally, Analysis Shows, By Brittny Mejia, Cindy Carcamo and Corina Knoll, LA Times, February 9, 2017]

This concentration of illegal aliens in predominately Democrat urban areas is a major advantage to President Trump.  Besides limiting any potential political cost of aggressive immigration enforcement, it makes that enforcement all the easier, given the concentration in a limited geographical area.  Another advantage is that the illegal aliens cannot flee to Republican dominated counties or States as those areas will be supporting enforcement by the Department of Homeland Security and even acting under Section 287(g) authority to arrest illegal aliens themselves.

Given the threat by California to interfere with Federal law enforcement efforts and another threat at secession, this news of the concentration of illegal aliens in States like California, and in deep Democrat counties like San Francisco, Alameda, Santa Clara, Miami-Dade, Travis , Dallas , Cook , and Los Angeles counties make a new Operation Wetback both a necessity and a political winner for President Trump.

Democrats And Illegal Aliens Go Together

All President Trump has to do is re-deploy DHS assets, such as Border Patrol Agents, to those Democrat counties and States, and begin aggressive and public immigration enforcement actions. Already illegal aliens are in a panic.  Just the threat of enforcement is causing illegal aliens to keep children home from school, not go to work and to not go out in public.  If the threat of enforcement causes this much consternation among illegal aliens, just think what real and public enforcement will do!  The President will also have the opportunity to do real damage to the Democrat Party by arresting and prosecuting Democrat politicians who are aiding and sheltering illegal aliens in violation of Title 8 United States Code, Section 1324.

The Plan: Obstruction, Violence, and Foreign Interference

The Democrat plan to impose the election of a new people has appeared to be developed.  The plan to thwart the Trump Plan to preserve the Historic American Nation will be a three point plan; First, obstruct with the courts; Second, use street violence to interfere with the faithful execution of the laws; and Third, use foreign governments funding the Treason Bar, e.g. Mexican meddling, to interfere with immigration law enforcement.

The obstruction by the courts is obvious to all.  The District Court decision and the 9th Circuit Court decision were obviously lawless and need little commentary.

Whether the rollout of the president’s temporary travel ban was ill-prepared or not, and whether one agrees or not about which nations or people should be subjected to extreme vetting, the president’s authority in the matter of protecting the borders and keeping out those he sees as potentially dangerous is universally conceded.
That a district judge would overrule the president of the United States on a matter of border security in wartime is absurd.
When politicians don black robes and seize powers they do not have, they should be called out for what they are–usurpers and petty tyrants. And if there is a cause upon which the populist right should unite, it is that elected representatives and executives make the laws and rule the nation. Not judges, and not justices.
[Trump Must Break Judicial Power, by Pat Buchanan, VDare, February 9, 2017]

The second part of the Democrats strategy to destroy the Historic American Nation is the use of street violence, terrorism, sedition, and rebellion as a tactic to thwart the enforcement of immigration laws by the United States government.

And no sooner than this writer warned the nation about the treason and rebellion, than mobs of Mexican terrorists ran into the streets to physically block the arrest and deportation of Mexican criminals.

An undocumented Mexican woman was deported by the US government after 20 years in the US, one of the first people expelled under President Donald Trump’s executive order on immigration. The move sparked protests in which seven people were arrested.
Guadalupe Garcia de Rayos, 36, came to the US illegally as a 14-year-old girl. She is a convicted felon, due to a 2008 raid on her Arizona workplace by then-Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio on the suspicion that the business was hiring immigrants who had used fraudulent IDs. She was not arrested as part of the raid, but was taken into custody by a SWAT team six months later, after investigators discovered discrepancies in her employment documents. She pleaded guilty in March 2009 to a reduced charge of criminal impersonation and sentenced to two years’ probation...
Once she was taken into custody, about 200 people gathered outside to protest, the Arizona Republic reported. They attempted to block federal buses and vans used to transport people from ICE custody to either detention centers or the border for deportation. As police arrived, the number of demonstrators dwindled, but seven people were arrested.
['Trump Executive Order' Deportation Of Mexican Woman Sparks Angry Protest, Arrests In Arizona, RT, February 10, 2017] 

The third avenue of attack on America and President Trump is the collusion of the Treason Bar and the Mexican government in the orderly deportation of illegal aliens by jamming the immigration courts, the Executive Office For Immigration Review (EOIR), with hearings and appeals.

A group of prominent Mexican citizens is developing plans to fight the Trump administration on deporting illegals from the United States by encouraging them to pack immigration courts to push the already overburdened system into a breakdown.
"The backlog in the immigration system is tremendous," former Mexican Foreign Minister Jorge Castañeda, told The Wall Street Journal.
The objective is to double or triple the backlog, "until Trump desists in this stupid idea," he said.
[Report: Prominent Mexicans to Urge Illegals to Clog US Immigration Courts, by Todd Beaman, NewsMax, February 11, 2017]

This is not the first time the former Foreign Minister of Mexico advocated obstruction of American immigration law.  Soon after the election of Donald John Trump, wetback advocate Jorge Castañeda suggested that Mexico would refuse to accept back Mexicans deported from the United States, a violation of Mexican law, as no Mexican can be refused entry to Mexico as no documents are needed for a Mexican citizen to enter Mexico from the United States.

A Mexican politician, who at one time served as foreign minister, is calling for a “line in the sand” against U.S. President-Elect Donald J. Trump.  He is calling for a systemic effort to fight a border wall and sabotage the deportation of illegal immigrants.
In an editorial piece published in Mexico’s El Financiero, Jorge Castañeda calls for the country to refuse to take in deported illegal immigrants unless the U.S. government can provide documents to prove that they are Mexican citizens.
“If they claim that by definition undocumented people do not have documents, we will then think that the majority of those deported are Central Americans and  send them there,” Castañeda wrote in his editorial. “Some Mexicans will end up over there. In the meantime, a backlog will accumulate and the North Americans will not know what to do.”
[Mexican Politician: Sabotage Trump’s Border Plans, by Ildefonso Ortiz, Breitbart, November 2016]

And the Mexican government is working with the Treason Bar as well to fund appeals of deportations:

FEBRUARY 11, 2017 —A group of prominent Mexican officials, legislators, and other political figures wants Mexico to resist President Trump’s deportation plans by assigning lawyers to fight cases in US immigration court, utilizing tough legal tactics that could jam up the workings of an already backlogged system.
Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, who hasn’t taken a position on the plan, says his administration will take steps to defend its citizens living in the US, including allocating $50 million to help undocumented immigrants facing deportation. But Monarca’s plan could be the most pointedly obstructionist of any measure suggested.
[Can An Army Of Lawyers Stop Trump's Mass Deportations?, by David Iaconangelo, Christian Science Monitor, February 11, 2017]

The easiest issue to deal with is the activities of the Mexican government.  The United States can send a demarche to the Mexican government instructing it to halt interference in the internal affairs of the United States or suffer consequences such as expulsion of Mexican diplomats.  The Department of Justice can also prosecute Treason Bar lawyers who accept payment from the Mexican government for failing to register as agents of a foreign power, a violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

Furthermore, if the Mexican government wants to play hardball, such as refusing to accept for deportation any Mexican national or third-country national who entered the United States from Mexico, the United States can shut down the border with Mexico, as it did when Mexican officials refused to extradite the killer of DEA Special Agent Kiki Camarena.

However, dealing with Mexico will be easy, as the United States holds all the cards.  Dealing with Mexican inspired terrorism and obstruction of Federal law enforcement will be more difficult, but will require that the Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III instruct his United States Attorneys and the Assistant Attorney General for National Security prosecute vigorously the Mexican and other thugs who interfere with Federal law enforcement operations with violence.  Something that is spreading rapidly and escalating.

Dealing with recalcitrant Federal judges will be more difficult.  It will require a legislative response, including ending judicial review of immigration enforcement and, more importantly, expanding Expedited Removal, the administrative removal of illegal aliens without recourse to either the Article III courts or an executive branch review at the EOIR.  Interestingly enough the 9th Circuit recently affirmed that illegal aliens in Expedited Removal have no right to legal counsel under the Fifth Amendment!  But expansion of Expedited Removal is dependant on cuckservatives like Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell getting legislation through Congress.

Wednesday, February 8, 2017

The Contagion Is Spreading

The possibility of widespread violence in the United States is becoming more likely with each passing day.  The issue of immigration and the suppression of freedom of speech appear to be the two issues that the Democrat Party will use to ignite a campaign of terrorism and violence throughout the United States, though mostly, fortuitously, in Democrat run States.  But that does not mean that Republican States will be immune, just more likely to take action against the terrorists. Riots after the election, riots on Inauguration Day, the violence directed at Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos, and the underlying widespread claims by the left that anyone they disagree with are the same as racists, culminating in the more recent claims by Santa Clara University that limited-government advocates at Turning Point USA, milquetoast types in any event, are the same as Nazis, and would not be allowed on campus, are part of a deliberate campaign to start a new Civil War.  This writer warned repeatedly that a deliberate campaign was being organized, mostly around the immigration issue with the open advocation of violence and the use of violent language.

And things are accelerating to a denouement; with rumors of immigration raids in the news, the radical left are doubling their efforts to violently interfere with Federal agents executing their duties.

Immigration lawyers are concerned over widespread work site enforcement actions that happened in 2006 and 2007 when I.C.E. cracked down on 1,300 undocumented immigrants working at six meat processing plants across six states. Some are worried this could be a sign of future federal enforcement efforts to come.
[Possible Immigration And Customs Enforcement Raids, by Roland Rodriguez, KRIS TV, February 7, 2017]

And the left is not going to allow those raids to happen:

In Central Texas, activist groups are going so far as to train volunteers on how to interact with law enforcement officials, local and federal, if an immigration raid breaks out in the area. The training is provided through a new program (borrowed from movements in Philadelphia) the organization started called “Sanctuary in the Streets."
So far, they have trained up to 130 people, but the plan is to train 500 volunteers in preparation of federal enforcement efforts.

And the main interior enforcement arms of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) are sorely unprepared for such resistance.  Officers at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Enforcement and Removal Operations (ICE ERO) and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), do not have the training or equipment to deal with either violent attacks or the sit-down blockades that these violent rioters and thugs will be using as their tactics to defeat deportations. Agents and officers don't have pepper spray, Tasers, riot batons, shields, flash bangs, or pepper-ball guns.  All items that will be needed to defeat attacks, rioters, and those who blockade vehicles, detention facilities, and DHS offices.

Pepper Ball Gun Not in ICE's Inventory

Stun Grenade Or Flash Bang Not In ICE Inventory

Riot Sized Pepper Spray, Also Not In ICE Inventory

The terrorists will be relying on local police to take no action as the University of California Police Department did during the Milo riots.

“Our campus has never experienced what it went through on Wednesday,” UCPD Police Chief Margo Bennett said Friday night, some 48 hours after protesters and police clashed over the planned appearance of right-wing provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos on the UC Berkeley campus. 
[UCPD Chief At Berkeley: ‘Crowd Control Situations Are Different’, by Emilie Raguso, Berkeleyside, February 4, 2017]

That claim by Chief Bennett was a lie.  UC Berkeley has been well known for its riots and violence since the 1960s.

 And we know that the only manner to deal with rioters is ruthless coercion.

But Chief Bennett has a different strategy, let the riot happen:

“We are getting a significant amount of criticism from outside of the East Bay area, and my only response to that is: Crowd control situations are different than a military exercise or an active shooter situation,” she said. “It’s just a different approach and a different set of tactics that you have to use in order to not escalate the situation, in order to control it. People have a hard time understanding that. I get it...”
“In situations like that, we understand that if we go out and we engage — with the level of force and the presence of the trained anarchist-style protesters that were present — it will embolden the protesters and it will escalate the level of violence,” she said. “And our officers exercised, I think, some very tough and extreme restraint.”
The goal Wednesday night, she said, initially was to ensure that the event occurred and that anyone who wanted to express their First Amendment rights could do so. UCPD aimed to protect life, and also to protect property. But hard decisions had to be made in the end.
“We prioritize the protecting of life higher than everything else,” she said. “Some broken windows, we can accept. The fact that no one was seriously injured is a blessing when that level of violence was occurring.”

Bennett denied anyone was injured seriously and claimed that since no complaints were filed, there were no serious injuries requiring investigation.  However, there were serious injuries from the rioters, but the victims knew that no serious investigation would be done by Chief Bennett.

Chief Margo Bennett, Chief Abettor of Riots and Terrorism And A Lesbian

Note that Chief Bennett is not too bright and allowed her badge, gun, and computer to be stolen from her car.  And is a lesbian.

In fact, internet sleuths were able to identify both perpetrators and victims that Chief Bennett so blithely ignores, the most prominent was a UC Berkeley employee.

A demonstrator who participated in the riot outside of Milo Yiannopolous’ scheduled talk at UC Berkeley last week has been identified as a university staff member.
Screengrabs passed around Twitter show tweets from an account with the handle @teen_archer talking about getting into a physical altercation with a Milo fan outside the event.
[UC Berkeley Rioter Identified As University Staff Member, by Justin Caruso, The Daily Caller, February 6, 2017]

But this dereliction of duty is part of the upcoming plan by the Democrat Party terrorists and their hirelings in local and State governments; allow riots and attacks to go on against those they disagree with as well as against DHS agents and officers who are arresting and deporting illegal aliens.  The Cold Civil War will be heating up very soon.  And it will be bloody.  Especially since DHS is not prepared for the resistance they will encounter in the streets.

In fact, if you want to know what will be happening, watch the movie, Children of Men.  It describes exactly what motivates the Cultural Marxists, to destroy their society in the name of the other.  The psychosexual attraction to violence by the left is horrifying.  It will be up to Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III and the FBI to take down Antifa, the Democrats, and the terrorists.