Thursday, March 30, 2017

DHS Goes Full #Cuck On The Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty

Any significant change in immigration enforcement policy from the Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty has officially ended.  The Trump Administration has fully endorsed the Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals (DACA) amnesty and ended any chance of a policy that Candidate Trump once endorsed, Operation Wetback, or at least the fear of an Operation Wetback to encourage illegal aliens to self-deport.  The two top officials responsible for immigration enforcement, Secretary John Kelly and Thomas Homan, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) emphatically stated that DACA is here to stay, that DACA recipients are hands-off for enforcement, that most illegal aliens are hands off, and Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III will not reign in kritarchs in the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) who are working on their own Administrative Amnesty.

First, Secretary Kelly, whom this writer has exposed as an amnesty supporter, and who isn't a Jumpin' Joe Swing, has endorsed what President Trump called unconstitutional and illegal, the DACA Amnesty.

The Homeland Security Department is not seeking to deport undocumented young people enrolled in an Obama administration program who have not violated the terms of their protected status, Secretary John F. Kelly told Senate Democrats on Wednesday.
[Kelly: Homeland Isn't Targeting Law-Abiding ‘Dreamers,' by Dean DeChiaro, Roll Call, March 29, 2017]

Kelly goes as far as stating that the program is essentially legal and permanent.

“The DACA status is a commitment not only by the government towards the so-called Dreamer, but by that person to obey the law, and some of them don’t. 

Furthermore, by endorsing this illegal and unconstitutional policy, Kelly gave all DACA recipients the ability to challenge any denial or withdrawal of their status the right to challenge that in a Federal court under due process claims.  Kelly gave to ambitious kritarchs the opening they need to seize immigration policy from Congress and the President.  And he just blew up the Constitution.  No longer does Congress have any authority over immigration, all that authority is now in the executive branch.

Furthermore, Kelly surrendered on the border as well.  Previously, Kelly endorsed separating illegal aliens entering on the southern border from their illegal alien children in order to discourage their illegal behavior.  But Kelly surrendered like a typical #cuckservative when challenged by the Democrats, then lied about it.

Washington (CNN)-Secretary of Homeland Security John Kelly confirmed that the department is considering separating children from their parents at the border.
"We have tremendous experience of dealing with unaccompanied minors," he told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on "The Situation Room." "We turn them over to (Health and Human Services) and they do a very, very good job of putting them in foster care or linking them up with parents or family members in the United States."
He continued: "Yes I'm considering (that), in order to deter more movement along this terribly dangerous network. I am considering exactly that. They will be well cared for as we deal with their parents. ... It's more important to me, Wolf, to try to keep people off of this awful network."
[Kelly: DHS Is Considering Separating Undocumented Children From Their Parents At The Border, by Daniella Diaz, CNN, March 7, 2017]

That was then, this is now:

Washington (CNN)-US Secretary of Homeland Security John Kelly on Wednesday assured Senate Democrats he doesn't intend to separate mothers and children at the border -- apparently walking back an earlier statement he made that such a policy could deter people from entering the country illegally.
In response to a question from California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Kelly said that DHS wouldn't be separating mothers and children at the border unless there was an extenuating reason, such as illness, according to several Democrats who attended the meeting.
Kelly later told CNN that characterization was fair, "unless there is some other consideration." He denied that he had been considering a policy to separate families.
"I don't think I have said that," Kelly said. "Wolf Blitzer first asked me about this and I said everything's on the table, we might under certain circumstances do that, but I don't think I've ever said as a deterrent or something like that."
[Kelly Says DHS Won't Separate Families At The Border, by Tal Kopan, CNN, March 29, 2017]

Here Kelly just encouraged another wave of Central American illegal aliens to run for the border. Family detention space is limited and already full.  Any more family groups of illegal aliens will be released, despite the Trump Administration claim to have ended "catch and releases."

As if to underscore the ongoing Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty, Acting Director Homan just confirmed that only criminal aliens will be arrested, every other illegal alien will be free to go about his or her daily business without fear of arrest.

Homan, whose agency has drawn fire for what some civil liberties advocates have criticized as heavy-handed tactics in rounding up and deporting illegal immigrants, insisted ICE was acting in a targeted fashion against those with criminal records.
He said ICE was also focused on individuals who have violated final deportation orders or have returned after being removed from the country.
"We don't conduct neighborhood sweeps," he said over cat-calls. "I don't want children to be afraid to go to school. I don't want people to be afraid to go to the doctor."
[California Immigration Forum Highlights State's Red-Blue Divide, by Sharon Bernstein, WSAU, March 28, 2017]

And to top off the abject surrender of the Trump Administration, EOIR kritarchswho want their own immigration policy, have gone rouge and are releasing clearly deportable illegal aliens.  This amnesty could be stopped by the Attorney General, as immigration judges are Department of Justice employees who serve at the pleasure of the President and are subject to direction and discipline from the Attorney General.

A man protected from deportation under former President Barack Obama’s administration but detained last month by immigration officials is free, for now.
Daniel Ramirez Medina, 24, was freed Wednesday from the federal immigration detention center in Tacoma after he posted a $15,000 bond.
Judge John Odell on Tuesday approved freeing Ramirez until his next immigration court hearing.
[Dreamer Held In Tacoma Released On Bond, by Alexis Krell, The Oregonian, March 29, 2017]

Note, despite living in the United States since the age of 7, he still cannot speak English.  Hardly the type of person who can contribute to the United States.

Ramirez briefly spoke to reporters gathered from about a dozen media outlets, saying in Spanish he was grateful to everyone who had supported him.

And that is not the only case, in Vermont Attorney General Sessions allowed two illegal aliens to be released by an immigration judge.

BURLINGTON, Vt. (AP) - Two advocates for dairy farm workers were released on bond Tuesday following their arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement about two weeks ago.
Zully Palacios and Enrique Balcazar, who are in the United States illegally, said they were still fighting for the release of a third activist, who remained behind bars.
Palacios and Balcazar, leaders of immigrant rights group Migrant Justice, were arrested by plainclothes ICE officers over immigration violations. They don’t have criminal records and weren’t charged with criminal offenses. They said they believe ICE targeted them because they are activists.
[2 Activists Arrested By Immigration Officials Are Released, by Cory Dawson, AP/Washington Times, March 28, 2017]

Just as it appears that Chuck Schumer runs the Senate, it appears that Democrats run the immigration enforcement policies of ICE:

U.S. Sens. Bernie Sanders, an independent, and Patrick Leahy, a Democrat, and U.S. Rep. Peter Welch, also a Democrat, said in a statement they have expressed serious concerns to ICE officials over the arrests.

Frankly, it appears that immigration patriots were played for suckers in this election.  Almost every Obama policy on immigration is still in effect.  The only change is that sometimes illegal alien criminals are being arrested and deported, but sometimes they aren't, or mostly they aren't. So in reality, there is no change.  We can now call it the Trump Regime Administrative Amnesty.

Monday, March 27, 2017

Governor Jerry Brown Vows Civil War To Stop Deportations, #BasedElbowMan Disagrees

The next Civil War, #CivilWarII, is coming sooner than you think.  On Sunday, Governor Jerry Brown, during a Meet The Press interview, warned the Federal government to stop deporting illegal aliens for face violence from the State of California. This should be no surprise, as the Treason Bar broached this strategy for the Democrat Party some months ago, which this writer reported in numerous postings, but first in November 2016. [Treason Bar Planning Civil War, by Federale, Federale Blog, November 26, 2016] Since then the plans for and actual treason, sedition, assassination plans, criminality, and violence have continuously become more widespread.

Traitor Jerry Brown

Now Jerry Brown has essentially adopted the Treason Bar plan of using the State of California, presumably the California Highway Patrol (ChiPs), the California State Military Reserve (CTM), and the California National Guard (CNG), as well as undoubtedly using Communist terrorist groups, such as Black Block and Antifa as auxiliaries or shock troops.  It is unlikely that the CHiPs, CTMR, and CNG will fight for illegal aliens as pointed out earlier as they are mostly white men, but the Antifa terrorists will be used extensively, and not prosecuted by the State Attorney General's Office, run by a Mexican Attorney General, Xavier Becerra or corrupt local District Attorneys, when they attack either Federal agents or patriotic Americans.

Despite the fact that the State of California under Jerry Brown filed a court brief against the Arizona law, Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act, popularly know as SB 1070, aiding immigration law enforcement that claimed the Federal government has sole authority over immigration, now Jerry Brown thinks that the State of California can not only have it's own immigration policy, but that it can interfere with Federal immigration enforcement actions.

“We’re the innovation capital, high tech, agriculture, 40- to 50-billion-dollar industry. You don’t want to mess with California, because you’re going to mess with the economy, and that could blow up in your face in a gigantic recession and roll the Republicans right out of this town.”
In the same interview, Brown said the state would fight hard to prevent the wall that Trump has proposed building between the U.S. and Mexico — but, he said, it would do so strategically, not through “stupid lawsuits.”
[Jerry Brown: ‘You Don’t Want To Mess With California,’ by Katy Murphy, The Mercury News, March 27, 2017]

Brown goes further, implying more violence and criminal defiance of Federal law:

I don't like that wall, number one. And to the extent that that violates law, certainly I would enforce that. We're not going to sit around and just play patsy and say, "Hey, go ahead. Lock us in. Do whatever the hell you want. Export-- deport 2 billion, 2 million people." No, we're going to fight, and we're going to fight very hard.
[Meet The Press 03-26-17, NBC News, March 26, 2017]

On cue, Communist thugs from Antifa were on California's streets attacking patriotic Americans:

Violence erupted at a Make America Great Again rally in Huntington Beach on Saturday after a protester opposed to President Trump allegedly doused a female organizer of the event with pepper spray, sparking a brawl that ended with several arrests.
A group of flag-waving Trump supporters tackled the man with the pepper spray, who was wearing a black mask, and started punching and kicking him, according to witnesses. Several other fights also broke out between demonstrators.
[Violence Erupts At Pro-Trump Rally In Huntington Beach, by Cindy Carcamo, Adam El Mahrek, and Ben Brazil, LAT, March 26, 2017]

The violence did not erupt, it was planned and executed by Antifa terrorists.  However, patriotic Americans, including #BasedElbowMan and hundreds of others, fought back and drove Antifa from the battlefield.

Anonymous Hero #BasedElbowMan Worthy Heir To #BasedStickMan

Already, Antifa is arming up for terrorist attacks:

However, across the street, on the Wesley Bolin Memorial Plaza-side of 17th Avenue were the left-wingers, some of them masking their faces, some not. Many of them were armed with long guns. You know, just like the "patriot" groups...
About that time, the group lined up, double-file, and began walking toward 19th Avenue...
Since you don't every day see groups of left-wingers totin' semi-automatic rifles, strolling down the sidewalk, I figured I would follow them and record this odd phenomenon via Facebook Live.
[Lemons: Gun-Totin' Left-Wingers Demonstrate at the Arizona Capitol: Is Bloodshed on the Horizon?, by Stephen Lemons, Phoenix New Times, March 26, 2017]

And like good Communists, they did not want the press taking their photos or interviewing them, then issuing threats when the press refused to stop photographing them.  They were certain afraid that photographs would be used as evidence in any upcoming treason and sedition trials.

Earlier, the spokeswoman told me that someone with the Brown Berets might talk with me, but she later came up as I was recording the group with my iPhone, and told me the Brown Berets were keeping it zipped as well.
She also asked me to stop filming. And I told her I wasn't going to do that, because we were on public property...
He would not do this, and the conversation went back and forth, with him asking me to stop filming and leave, and me informing him that we're in a public place and I'm not going anywhere.
"I'm just going to warn you that we're not responsible for anything that might happen to that phone," he told me, meaning the phone I was holding.
The spokeswoman approached, justifying their request that I not film because they were "trying to protect the safety and identity of our members."
Since many were hiding their faces already, I didn't see this as much of an issue. But I informed her that we live in a free society and that means, when you are demonstrating in a public place, the press gets to film you.

Communist Terrorists Openly Preparing For Violence

So, besides violence in the streets against the historic American people, the Communists are arming up for their revolution.  Violence is in the offing, lots of violence, and it will be very bloody.

It is time for President Trump and Attorney General Sessions to begin investigations and arrests, not only of seditious State officials, such as Governor Jerry Brown, but of terrorist groups such as the Brown Berets and Antifa.  If Trump and Sessions don't act now, the blood will flow.  A statesman once warned of this: As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding. Like the Roman, I seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with much blood".

Time for patriots to arm up.  Guns, shields, pepper spray, sticks, etc.  Never be at a public demonstration without the means to defend yourself.  And be prepared to have to fight Antifa terrorists in the streets.  The Cold Civil War will get very hot soon.  Urban warfare is nasty business, but you will have to fight to defend yourself against the Jerry Brown and his Antifa thugs.

Sunday, March 26, 2017

Arrest Robert Crist

Robert Crist is a terrorist.  Robert Crist says violence directed against Federal agents enforcing Federal law is justified.  Robert Crist says the taxpayers of the United States and the State of Wisconsin who pay his salary have a responsibility to not just educate illegal aliens, but to assist them to remain in the United States. Time to arrest Robert Crist for incitement to violence against Federal employees.

Robert Crist, Who Advocates Violence Against Federal Agents On Behalf Of Illegal Aliens

Robert Crist is also the Superintendent of the Delavan-Darien School District located in Walworth County, WI.

DELAVAN-DARIEN -- Educating students and now parents -- when it comes to the new immigration laws. The Delavan-Darien School District is giving a quick lesson to all. But that knowledge is not coming without controversy.
Do not open doors, remain silent, and fight back. Those are just a few of the directives given in a document sent to families in the Delavan-Darien School District.
[Document Sent To Parents Of Students In One School District Stirs Up Immigration Controversy, by Derica Williams, Fox 6, March 10, 2017]

Crist supports illegal aliens and wants more illegal aliens in Walworth County.  Crist does not care that illegal aliens are violating Federal law.  Crist thinks it is appropriate and legal to give legal advice to criminals despite his not being an attorney.  And he does this because allegedly some illegal aliens in his school are not learning.

"With the ramping up of deportation, a lot of our illegal people obviously getting very nervous -- some are even hesitant to send their kids to school," said Dr. Robert Crist, Superintendent of Delavan-Darien School District.

Crist was unable to actually give any examples of any students not getting educated or any actual fears from any student, as if that mattered.

"Are your counselors or teachers hearing this from students?" WISN 12 News reporter Kent Wainscott asked.
"Some are, but some students are just afraid to talk to anybody," Crist said.
[School District Advises Families What To Do If ICE Agents Show Up At Their Door, Kent Wainscott, WISN, March 10, 2017]

Clearly this is not motivated by any fears among students, but a deliberate political policy position by Crist to support illegal aliens. If students are afraid to talk, how do you know that they are afraid?

"What happens if parents are picked up at a factory in Milwaukee and the kids are in school? Kids go home and nobody's home. What happens there?" Crist said.

Frankly, if the parents of a student are arrested for any reason, criminal or immigration, it is no concern of the school district.  Does the Delavan-Darien School District send out messages about criminal arrests of parents by local police for local crimes? Of course not.  It is not a concern of the school district that some child's parent was arrested for drug dealing or welfare fraud.  There is another branch of government that is concerned with abandoned children, that is usually called Child Protective Services.

But Crist goes further, he incites violence against Federal agents enforcing immigration law.  Part of the flyer sent out offering legal advice to illegal aliens, advises the illegal aliens to "fight back" against arrest.

All with the typical clenched fist of violent terrorist groups like Antifa. Clearly Crist was in contact with some violent groups during his creation of this document.  Crist will of course claim that he means fight back legally, but he is just pushing the limits of incitement to violence.  Violence that the left has stepped up, whether it is the Treason Bar advocating murdering Federal agents, practice runs at assassination of Cabinet Secretaries, violent resistance to the arrest of illegal aliens, sedition, or leftist street thugs attacking Americans in the streets.

It also tells illegal aliens not to sign anything.  I doubt if Superintendent Crist is licensed to practice law in the State of Wisconsin, so this advice is in violation of various Wisconsin statutes prohibiting him from practicing law without a license.  And this can be very bad legal advice.  Not signing documents before an immigration officer can result in long periods of detention.  In particular cases, it might be, as lawyers say, in the interest of, an alien to sign an agreement to depart the United States rather than be held in custody until the eventual deportation.  I wonder of the taxpayers, the attorneys for the Delavan-Darien School District, and the school board reviewed this message before it went out.  Unlikely, given the legal jeopardy the school district is in at the moment.  And note the Mexican flag on the Delavan-Darien School District website.  Is Walworth County now part of Mexico?

Saturday, March 25, 2017

Treason Bar Sets Their Sights On Expedited Removal

Expedited Removal, the legal and due process used to remove certain classifications of illegal aliens has been targeted by the Treason Bar and the usual suspects. After the milquetoast Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security John Kelly announced new initiatives and rollbacks of certain Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty policies, it came to the attention of the Treason Bar that Secretary Kelly had the intention of fully implementing all the provisions of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA)which created Expedited Removal.  It should be plainly stated that Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama failed to fulfil their duty to see that Expedited Removal was fully implemented.  All three Presidents administered their own Administrative Amnesty on the issue in violation of their Oath of Office to see that the laws of the United States were faithfully executed.

Because of this constitutional failure, President Trump and Secretary Kelly have decided to see that IIRIRA will be fully implemented, including Expedited Removal.  The Treason Bar has declared that to be unacceptable and the Treason Bar is now judge shopping to see that the expansion of Expedited Removal is stopped.

The Trump administration’s plan for putting hundreds of thousands of recent migrants in the country illegally onto a fast track for deportation is likely to trigger the next major legal battle over immigration enforcement...
But the administration’s efforts to step up immigration enforcement and streamline deportation — outlined in memos from Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly — could affect far more people, including potentially most of the estimated 11 million immigrants living illegally in the United States.
One part of that effort — the expanded use of what the law refers to as expedited removal — is almost certain to face a constitutional challenge in the courts.
[Trump's Fast-Track Deportations Face A Legal Hurdle: Do Unauthorized Immigrants Have A Right To A Hearing Before A Judge?, by David Savage, LAT, March 22, 2017]

Sounds like David Savage is an advocate, not a reporter.  Contact him here.

To speed up deportations, Kelly proposed to use expedited removal, with no hearings before a judge, for those immigrants who cannot prove they “have been continuously present in the United States for a two-year period” prior to their arrest. The new procedures would not be limited to border areas and could be used to deport immigrants living in the interior of the country.
Kelly said the law since 1996 has authorized the government to “remove aliens expeditiously,” and he said his agents “shall make full use of these authorities.”
Immigrants rights advocates voiced alarm. The American Immigration Council said this approach means a Homeland Security agent “operates as prosecutor and judge and often arrests an individual and orders him or her deported on the same day...” 
Civil liberties lawyers also call that proposal unconstitutional, and they expect to sue if the Trump administration puts the new policy into effect.
“We believe ‘expedited removal’ fails to afford a meaningful opportunity to defend oneself, and that, whatever its validity when employed at the border, it would be unconstitutional as applied to those living among us who are entitled to full due process protection,” said David D. Cole, national legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union.

And they will be hanging their hats on "due process of law." Which appears to mean a right of appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly said that immigrants, even those who are here illegally, are protected by the Constitution’s guarantee of due process of law...
But how much process is due for immigrants who entered illegally or overstayed their visas remains “a gray area,” said UCLA law professor Hiroshi Motomura.
“It’s possible that a court might find that a full immigration court hearing isn’t constitutionally required,” he said. But it is also possible “that a single field agent making the decision is constitutionally deficient.”

Embarrassingly, the "law professor" and the Treason Bar wailing that one immigration officer can deport someone is without basis in fact.

The process of Expedited Removal, or ER as it is commonly referred to by DHS employees, is not one person making a decision, but three, at least "single field agent" making the finding, then a review by two levels of supervisor.

And here it is in writing, the actual procedure followed by an immigration officer of any component of DHS:

(2) Determination of inadmissibility. (i) Record of proceeding. An alien who is arriving in the United States, or other alien as designated pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, who is determined to be inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C) or 212(a)(7) of the Act (except an alien for whom documentary requirements are waived under § 211.1(b)(3) or § 212.1 of this chapter), shall be ordered removed from the United States in accordance with section 235(b)(1) of the Act. In every case in which the expedited removal provisions will be applied and before removing an alien from the United States pursuant to this section, the examining immigration officer shall create a record of the facts of the case and statements made by the alien. This shall be accomplished by means of a sworn statement using Form I-867AB, Record of Sworn Statement in Proceedings under Section 235(b)(1) of the Act. The examining immigration officer shall read (or have read) to the alien all information contained on Form I-867A. Following questioning and recording of the alien's statement regarding identity, alienage, and inadmissibility, the examining immigration officer shall record the alien's response to the questions contained on Form I-867B, and have the alien read (or have read to him or her) the statement, and the alien shall sign and initial each page of the statement and each correction. The examining immigration officer shall advise the alien of the charges against him or her on Form I-860, Notice and Order of Expedited Removal, and the alien shall be given an opportunity to respond to those charges in the sworn statement. After obtaining supervisory concurrence in accordance with paragraph (b)(7) of this section, the examining immigration shall serve the alien with Form I-860 and the alien shall sign the reverse of the form acknowledging receipt. Interpretative assistance shall be used if necessary to communicate with the alien...
(7) Review of expedited removal orders. Any removal order entered by an examining immigration officer pursuant to section 235(b)(1) of the Act must be reviewed and approved by the appropriate supervisor before the order is considered final. Such supervisory review shall not be delegated below the level of the second line supervisor, or a person acting in that capacity. The supervisory review shall include a review of the sworn statement and any answers and statements made by the alien regarding a fear of removal or return. The supervisory review and approval of an expedited removal order for an alien described in section 235(b)(1)(A)(iii) of the Act must include a review of any claim of lawful admission or parole and any evidence or information presented to support such a claim, prior to approval of the order. In such cases, the supervisor may request additional information from any source and may require further interview of the alien.
[8 Code of Federal Regulations Sec. 235.3 Inadmissible Aliens and Expedited Removal, Service Law Books, DHS] 

The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) are the regulations created for each Federal law, the mirroring the appropriate United States Code section on which they are based.  In this case 8 CFR 235.3.  And while only one supervisor is mentioned in the regulations, in practice, all ERs are verbally approved by a second line supervisor as well before the removal is executed.

And this is the due process of law that illegal aliens are receiving now.  Note how the Treason Bar appeared to be conceding that illegal aliens caught at the border might be constitutionally subjected to ER, but other illegal aliens should not be.  Basically the Treason Bar is claiming that the further from the border you are and the longer you remain uncaptured, the more "due process of law" you deserve. That is quite ridiculous.  Due process of law should be the same for each class of aliens.  In this case, aliens with no legal status should have the same due process of law, mere administrative review by a first or second line supervisor. Further appeals have no purpose other than to gum up the works, as certain Mexican politicians are planning.

There is no need for any outside review of any claim by an alien unlawfully present.  Only those admitted in a classification giving the alien the right to remain in the United States on a permanent basis; e.g. legal permanent residents, asylees, and refugees, should have any appeal rights to either an administrative system, such as was the norm before 1983, or the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), the immigration courts, created by administrative fiat in 1983, another reason to criticize Ronald Reagan.

What President Trump should seek is an expansion of Expedited Removal by legislation, then use his administrative authority to close down the EOIR, and recreate the position of Special Inquiry Officer (SIO) to review and adjudicate appeals of removal orders.  In doing so, he will clip the ambitions of EOIR immigration judges, placing them firmly under the control of the Attorney General, or better yet, the Secretary of DHS, with the authority to appoint and remove SIOs at the Secretary's pleasure. Aliens would still have the right to use an attorney to represent himself, but under stricter discipline, the SIOs would be prevented from generally sabotaging immigration hearings as immigration judges do now by repeatedly rescheduling hearings and be required to make decisions immediately after hearing the alien's appeal.  Instead of appeals taking years, they would take no more than a day, but most would be done in hours.  Giving then SIOs the title of "immigration judges" and the permission to wear judicial robes was a major blunder.  Such trappings of judgeship gave these officials delusions of grandeur, which has resulted in ambitions of power and prestige that was inappropriate for a person reviewing the minor facts about a deportation case and alienage.

Time for President Trump to put the minor kritarchs of the EOIR out of business and streamline the immigration appeals system.

Thursday, March 23, 2017

NR's Mona Charen Goes Cultural Marxist On Those Who Oppose Illegal Aliens

Well, National Review has decided to go full Cultural Marxist on amnesty and illegal immigration.  After Heather Wilhelm repeated the Kevin Williamson excuses for illegal immigration and laughable claims about the border fence, Mona Charen, the always dependable leftist at NR, has gone and repeated every left wing talking point and lie about illegal aliens and crime. She even defends by implication letting the illegal alien rapists of a 14 year old girl at the Montgomery County school in the United States as the cost of cheap labor.  Subtitled "We’re against emotionalism, except when we’re not," Charen plays the classic "I'm the moderate, reasonable conservative in this conversation" virtue signalling New York City leftists, apparently so she can continue to get those dinner invitations.

It’s a shame then, that so many conservatives are disregarding the virtues they laud in Gorsuch — prudence, careful weighing of facts, refusal to be swayed by emotional appeals — when it comes to a disturbing story of a rape in Maryland.
[Good, Bad, and Emotional Arguments about Immigration, by Mona Charen, NR, March 22, 2017]

You see, it is only those troglodytes at Breitbart or on Twitter that are emotional about the rape and sodomization of a 14 year old girl by two illegal aliens, one of them obviously too old to be a freshman in a high school.  But that is how Never Trumpers role.  Any issue, including child rape, is to be supported if Donald J. Trump opposes it.  Talk about an emotional rather than prudential response.  One gets the feeling that Charen just doesn't like Americans that much.

Charen has become increasingly unbalanced since the rise of Donald J. Trump and this screed is not surprising.  She becomes a cold hearted witch further in:

Emotional reactions to heinous crimes are completely understandable, but as Judge Gorsuch has properly reminded us, our feelings are not a good guide to justice. Neither are they a prescription for sensible policy. Quite the opposite.

Then she goes from the disgusting to the mere deluded, claiming illegal aliens are better than Americans, since their crime rate is much lower than your average American.  She does not note that American crime statistics are skewed high by predominately black crime. Now pointing that out would certainly end invitations to Manhattan cocktail parties.

There are good and bad arguments against immigration. I am sympathetic to some restrictionist points, but smearing immigrants as out-of-control criminals is shameful. High rates of immigration, legal and illegal, are not associated with spikes in crime. In our recent history, between 1990 and 2013, the illegal immigrant population in the U.S. more than tripled to 11.2 million. Yet FBI data indicate that the violent-crime rate declined by 48 percent during those years. This included violent crimes like aggravated assault, robbery, rape, and murder. Rates of property crime fell by 41 percent, including declining rates of motor-vehicle theft, larceny/robbery, and burglary. As a survey by the Cato Institute shows, immigrants — both legal and illegal — are less likely to be incarcerated than native-born Americans. And when you exclude those illegal immigrants who are jailed for immigration offenses (i.e., just for being here illegally), the numbers really plunge. 

Of course, you have to ignore the inconvenient immigration related crimes by illegal aliens, which she appears to presume is merely the crime of illegal entry, but does not mention that explicitly.  She does not even think some of those illegal entry crimes are by re-entry by felon or re-entry after a deportation, crimes much more serious that a single illegal entry, so much so that the second crime is punishable by up to 20 years in prison.  In fact, every illegal alien is a criminal, except minors, in that illegal entry is a crime, either by entry without inspection (EWI) or by fraud during inspection and admission.

This myth of the law abiding illegal alien that Charen holds so dear is that, a myth, and something that the radical left loves to claim, like when they claim there are more white American terrorists than Muslim terrorists, usually with the caveat "since 9/11," as if 9/11 was something out of the normal for Muslims.  Similarly Charen says illegals are more law abiding, if you ignore that part that makes them illegal. Charen is part of the Blame America First crowd and the actual evidence of illegal alien crime is quite strong.  Ann Coulter, among others, has debunked Charen's claim not only in her book, Adios America but in this convenient video as well:

The Center For Immigration Studies also debunks the myth of the law abiding illegal alien:

All of these illegal alien apologists acknowledge in one way or another that up to 75 percent of illegal aliens routinely commit multiple felonies by using fraudulent documents in order to get jobs and that eight million of 11 million illegal aliens could be deported for crimes that they commit — forgery, Social Security fraud, perjury on I-9 forms, and even identity theft. All of these are felonies. Despite this, the Wall Street Journal, through fake-news story after fake-news story, continues to deny that illegal aliens commit crimes and continues to push the myth that illegal aliens are law-abiding.
Thus, in order to perpetuate the myth of the law-abiding illegal alien, the Wall Street Journal is forced to distinguish between "serious crimes" and "not serious crimes."
Exactly how the Journal does this is unclear, but it may be that if someone commits a violent act against a Wall Street Journal editorial writer that would be considered a "serious crime." However, if an illegal alien uses "illegal documents" with the personal identifying information of an American child, that would not be a serious crime, as long as it wasn't the editorialist's child, even though the American child's credit could be destroyed, her medical records could be corrupted with life-threatening consequences, arrest records and criminal convictions could be attached to her Social Security number, and she could be denied means-tested benefits.
[Illegal Alien Crime Deniers: Wall Street Journal, By Ronald W. Mortensen, CIS, March 18, 2017]

Charen doesn't get out of the Manhattan elite bubble and is not intellectually curious to know that the scholarly work on illegal alien crime is not as clear cut as she claims.

Illegal immigration and crime became a hot topic this election cycle as soon as Donald Trump burst into the Republican primary with his call to build a wall to keep criminal illegal aliens out of the country. Such policy discussions have fallen by the wayside as the election cycle morphed into a mudslinging fight of personal insults and accusations of sexual assaults, but the link between illegal immigration and crime is still worth discussing, especially since Trump's initial highlighting of the issue fueled his rise.
[9 Things You Need To Know About Illegal Immigration And Crime, by Aaron Bandler, The Daily Wire, October 22, 2016]

And the most trenchant reason is that the government is deliberately not telling us about illegal alien crime:

1. Federal, state and local governments keep data involving illegal immigration and crime out of the public purview. Fox News reported in 2015 that a source from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) said "that comprehensive statistics on illegal immigrant crime are not available from the federal government, and suggested contacting county, state and federal jail and prison systems individually to compose a tally, a process that would encompass thousands of local departments."
Former Department of Justice attorney J. Christian Adams also told Fox News that some states do readily track illegal immigration and crime, but they withhold the specific numbers from the public out of fear of backlash from the federal government or for political purposes.

So while there may be some debate about illegal alien crime, Charen, for some reason, categorically states there is no problem.  Why? Most likely it is Trump Derangement Syndrome, that something many NR pointy headed intellectuals suffer from.  And they just don't really care about the real American victims of alien crime.  To elites like Charen, you have to break a few eggs to get cheap domestic labor, and maintain your viability and spot on invitation list among the Radical Chic set on the Upper West Side.  Those eggs are raped and murdered Americans.

Brown Run Border, Hispanic Corruption At DHS Continues

Hispanic corruption in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) continues to accelerate.  And the corruption is spreading from the most impacted component, U.S. Customs and Border Protection's two main sub-components, the U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) and the Office of Field Operations. Corruption among Hispanic Border Patrol Agents and CBP Officers is rampant and a feature, not a bug of immigration and diversity as this writer has exposed as the Brown Run Border.  Now the corruption is spreading to the more "elite" components of DHS, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI).


INLAND EMPIRE, Calif. (KGTV)--A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) special agent from Murrieta was arrested yesterday on charges he helped a foreign national illegally enter the country. 
Felix Cisneros, 42, made his first court appearance Thursday afternoon but was not asked to enter a plea. He'll be released from custody on $300,000 bond tonight.
Cisneros is a 10-year veteran with Homeland Security Investigations in the Inland Empire is accused of allowing a Mexican national who had left the U.S. re-enter the country through Los Angeles International Airport on September 7, 2013 after being asked to do so by the leader of a criminal organization based in Southern California.
[ICE Agent Arrested For Helping Inadmissible Mexican National Into U.S. At LAX, by Sandy Coronilla, KGTV News 10, March 23, 2017]


A former Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer was convicted on multiple counts of bribery, including accepting money and sex in exchange for work authorization papers.
The New Jersey man, Arnaldo Echevarria, worked as a deportation officer and committed the offenses between 2012 and 2014, reported. He is charged with making false statements to a jury, harboring an undocumented immigrant, and seven counts of bribery. He was indicted last month.
Echevarria, 39, allegedly accepted up to $75,000 in exchange for getting work authorization for people in the country without proper documentation. He said the people had been granted temporary protected status, which is only available to people who are fleeing armed conflict and other emergency circumstances.
[New Jersey ICE Officer Accepted Sex In Exchange For Work Papers, by Teresa Welsh, McClatchy/, March 11, 1017]

When a population from a corrupt and backward society are brought in wholesale to the nation, massive crime problems a consequence.  And when that corrupt population are brought into government, honesty and integrity in government suffers.  Compound that with affirmative action, and the result is an immigration law enforcement agency that is populated by the corrupt population that was brought in and their progeny.

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Heather Wilhelm Goes All Kevin Williamson On The Border Wall On Behalf Of Illegal Aliens

Just when you thought that the #cuckservatives at NRO had accustomed themselves to winning with Donald J. Trump and joined in the fight against illegal aliens, they go all in with the Democrat talking points.

Heather Wilhelm, Enabler Of Illegal Immigration

Some readers may remember my run-in with NRO's chief #cuckservative and illegal alien cheerleader Kevin Williamson when he was triangulating with Obamaism.  When I exposed his support for Texas supporting illegal aliens being educated and employed in Texas, as well as ridiculing the border wall, he had an effeminate case of the vapors. And he snarks at the border wall, claiming no illegals there as that is where rattlesnakes go to die. [The Forms Of Kanly Shall Be Observed, by Federale, VDare, October 1, 2011 and NRO, RINOs, Illegals And Amnesty, by Federale, VDare, September 25, 2011]  You can also see the smack down's given to Williamson and the #cuckservatives that followed with other VDare writers.  [Kevin Williamson and NRO vs. Federale (And The American People), by James Fulford, VDare, September 28, 2011 and  NRO`s Jay Nordlinger: Patriotic Immigration Reformers “From The Fever Swamps.”, by Patrick Cleburne, VDare, March 14, 2011]

Kevin Williamson, Who Spends Too Much Time At Chipotle

Williamson also gives us the old Democrat laugh line, are you going to build it in the middle of the Rio Grand?  Well, Heather Wilhelm brings up that old line in opposition to a border fence.

Here things get goofy: Where will the river portion of the wall go? On the Texan side of the Rio Grande, effectively blocking off river access and views? Down the middle of the river, just to be fair? Right through a hidden gem of a national park, which borders two massive Mexican conservation tracts and boasts daunting natural boundaries on either side?
[Trump’s Wall Meets Texas’s Biggest National Park, by Heather Wilhelm, NR, March 22, 2017]

Wilhelm pathetic laugh line is part of a larger screed against the wall and by implication immigration law enforcement.  Her main theme is that a wall will ruin the Big Bend National Park.  Strange to single out the Big Bend portion of the wall for such criticism when most of the wall will be built along the other 1,500 miles of the border with Mexico, most of which is neither scenic nor difficult to build on.  The Big Bend Park is the most inaccessible and most difficult part of the border to cross, the Rio Grand had created a miniature Grand Canyon there, with the river deep in ravines dug over the eons into soft and dangerous to climb sheer walls.  Not many illegals will be trying to cross there. Which makes Wilhelm's concern so curious.

Curious because she then claims the wall can't be built because of concerns over eminent domain. Apparently that is another excuse for not building the wall.  Property owners will tie up the project in the courts.  Well, unlikely.  The private property on the Texas side of the Rio Grand is for the most part worthless.  Most is covered in dense cottonwood trees, other scrub trees, and bushes.  Houses built there are mostly abandoned and used now for drug and illegal alien drops.  I doubt that Wilhelm has ever been to Rio Grand border in the areas such as Laredo, El Paso, McAllen, and other small towns.  But she does not have to.  She can just view the many seasons of Border Wars broadcast on the National Geographic Channel. There she can see that the property on the border is essentially worthless.  Consequently, property values are low.  All the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) lawyers have to do is review property tax records that will show the the minor cost of just compensation required by the Constitution.  Most property owners will be happy to sell to the Federal government as illegal alien and drug smuggling have made the Rio Grand area unlivable and property valueless.

Which brings us back to Wilhelm's motivation for this piece repeating Democrat talking points: a border wall is ugly, the border wall is bad for the environment, the border wall can't be built because of oppressed property owners of color.

Well, besides being loser #cucks who surrender to the Democrats even after winning.  Wilhelm probably is in the thrall of the Slave Power, just as Williamson is with his support for the Chipotle Business Model, hiring illegal aliens, or is an infiltrator; a leftist who really wants to elect a new people, which would explain her parroting factless Cultural Marxist talking points.

It is time for NR to shut down.  If they won't fight for America by building a fence, they serve no purpose.  Let those who love America like she was, as President Trump does, take over the fight. Wilhelm and Williamson can go to hell, for I will go to Texas, and build that wall.  Davy Crockett was a patriot, too bad Wilhelm and Williamson aren't.

Monday, March 20, 2017

President Trump About To Surrender On A Refugee Bad Deal?

It appears that someone has got to President Trump.  The deal concerning Muslim refugees on the independent island nation of Nauru that was foisted upon the United States by Barack Hussein Obama a deal that then President-Elect Trump denounced, appears to be going through.  Just over one month ago I reported that President Trump appeared to be successfully using a judo move on the kritarchs that were trying to impose Muslim terrorist refugees on the United States.  President Trump had removed U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) personnel from Nauru and Australia, consequently check-mating moves by the kritarchs and the refugee lobby.  I also pointed out that was a strategy to use on a larger scale: remove all USCIS and Department of State personnel assigned overseas to process refugees.  No employees overseas to do the job, then no refugees would be able to come to the United States.  Another Trump victory.  [Trump’s Options In The Refugee War With The Kritarchs–The Executive Branch Can Refuse To Process The Refugees, by Federale, VDare, February 16, 2017]

However, that was not to be.

CANBERRA, Australia (AP) -- U.S. security officers have begun fingerprinting refugees held on Pacific islands in the final stage of assessing who will find new lives in the United States, asylum seekers said Monday.
Department of Homeland Security officers are taking biometric details from refugees on Nauru, including fingerprints, heights and weights, according to a document circulated among asylum seekers and provided to AP by Mehdi, a refugee on the island nation who for security reasons did not want his family name published.

U.S. officials began scheduling appointments with asylum seeker families on Nauru from Monday, Mehdi said.

[US Officials Begin Fingerprinting Refugee Families On Nauru, by Rod McGuirk, AP, March 20, 2017]

However, there is time to stop this bad deal:

If refugees pass the initial fingerprint security screening, they will have face-to-face interviews with Homeland Security officers in Nauru or Papua New Guinea, the document said.
Refugees had been given no indication of how long the security vetting process would take, Mehdi said.

Contact the White House and let President Trump know his first instincts were correct. (202) 456-1111  Or tweet him:

Apparently "extreme vetting" has been promised, but unlikely it includes the only real method of extreme vetting, a polygraph examination.

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Another Illegal Alien Intimidates President Trump

Again, using the #LyingPress and Democrat politicians, an illegal alien has been able to intimidate the Trump Administration, or, more likely, the weak kneed John Kelly, who isn't a Jumping Joe Swing. Elvira Arellano, well known illegal alien, who was over one year ago, allowed to re-enter the United States despite two previous deportations.

Elvira Arellano, The Illegal Alien Who John Kelly Won't Deport

An immigration judge extended parole Wednesday for twice-deported Mexican activist Elvira Arellano, who famously took refuge in a Chicago church when she faced removal in 2006.
Arellano’s probation for violating immigration law was set to expire Wednesday, but the legal victory will allow her and her 3-year-old Mexican-born son Emiliano to remain in the country for another year alongside her U.S.-born son, 18-year-old Saul Arellano.
[Immigration Activist Granted Yearlong Reprieve From Deportation, NBC Chicago, March 15, 2017] 

And in typical fashion, the #LyingPress gets basic facts wrong.  Arellano's parole was not extended by an immigration judge, but by administrative fiat by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO).

Something that the reporter eventually mentions in the story for some reason.

All three arrived for her first meeting at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement office in Chicago under President Donald Trump’s administration, hoping for either relief through political asylum, or an extension of her current status. 

Can't the media get even the basic facts correct?

While she was not granted asylum, she was given a one-year reprieve from being deported, yet again, as her case continues to be reviewed.
“ICE did not take action at this time because her immigration court proceedings are still pending,” the immigration agency said in a statement. 

The real question is why did ICE ERO renew her parole in the United States under the new administration of Donald J. Trump.  Arellano was only allowed in the United States because of the personal intervention of then President Barack Hussein Obama.  There was no legal basis to parole Arellano into the United States.  She could have submitted an application for refugee status from Mexico.  Her claim was, of course, ridiculous on the face of it.

In any event, ICE ERO should have immediately revoked the parole and reinstated her previous deportation order.  However, someone in the Trump Administration decided to continue Arellano's public flouting of the immigration laws of the United States.  Who is it?  John Kelly, our nation's eyes turn to you, and not in a good way.

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Kritarchs Strike Again

The judicial dictatorship, kritarchy, is here and it's not just the usurpation by the courts regarding the second version of the President Trump order on excluding certain aliens, which is bad enough.  Another Federal judge, in fact not even a judge, but a lowly magistrate, has taken it upon himself to begin the process to judicially impose the Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals (DACA) on the nation.  And I did warn my readers and President Trump about both the kritarch and DACA menace to society.

SEATTLE – A federal magistrate recommended Tuesday that the case of a Mexican man who was picked up by immigration agents near Seattle despite participating in a federal program for those brought to the country illegally as children remain in federal court and not in immigration court. The judge also declined to immediately release 24-year-old Daniel Ramirez Medina while the case proceeds.
U.S. Magistrate Judge James P. Donohue denied the Justice Department’s request to dismiss the case brought by Ramirez, saying arguments that his constitutional rights were violated should be heard in U.S. District Court. Lawyers for Ramirez say his rights were violated with his February arrest and detention because Ramirez is a current Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program recipient.
Government attorneys had argued that under federal immigration law, Ramirez could challenge his detention in immigration court, a system within the Justice Department. But Donohue said Ramirez’s claims are “independent of his removal” from the country.
[Judge Denies DOJ Request To Dismiss Seattle ‘Dreamer’ Case, by Lisa Baumann, Spokesman Review, March 14, 2017]

Kritarch Junior James Donohue

This is in fact revolutionary, and presages an attempt by kritarchs on the Federal bench to seize control of the immigration process from Congress and the Executive Branch.  Much like the decisions in the two travel bans, Magistrate Donohue's decision has no basis in law.  In the case of immigration arrests, aliens cannot challenge the arrest, but only being held in custody, and that through the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), though in recent days other Federal courts have interfered with such decisions.  The judges of the EOIR are generally quite generous with bonds, which explains why so few illegal aliens appear for their deportation hearings.  However, the initial arrest is never challenged in Federal court.  The facts of the case are then argued before the EOIR in a hearing to determine alienage or removability, e.g. whether the person in question is an alien and if that alien can be deported.  The alien can claim he is not an alien, e.g. is a U.S. citizen, or more likely admit alienage, and claim lawful presence, or claim some sort of relief from deportation.

Basically, Magistrate Donohue is setting the groundwork for sending all immigration cases to Federal Article III courts rather than the administrative law process at the EOIR, something that the Treason Bar has long sought.

And other judges have not been shy at claiming authority over other aspects of immigration law assigned by Congress to the Executive Branch.

A Federal judge on Friday blocked President Donald Trump's administration from enforcing his new travel ban against a Syrian family looking to escape their war-torn homeland by fleeing to Wisconsin.
The ruling likely is the first by a judge since Trump issued a revised travel ban on Monday, according to a spokesman for the Washington state attorney general, who has led states challenging the ban.
[Judge: Revised Trump Ban Can't Be Enforced On Syrian Family Trying To Flee To Wisconsin, by Todd Richmond, AP/Chicago Tribune, March 10, 2017]

Worse yet, those family members are outside the United States and the judge's order includes instruction to begin processing the application.

After the Trump ban was blocked the first time, the approval process restarted for the Syrian family and they're now preparing to travel to Jordan for visa interviews at the U.S. embassy, the last step before U.S. customs officials decide whether to issue them visas. But the family doesn't have dates for the interviews yet and Trump's new travel ban goes into effect March 16, stirring fears that the process could halt again before visas are issued, according to the Syrian man's attorneys.

Note that though they are allegedly in such danger, they did not flee Aleppo to refugee camps in Jordan, but they remained, for about 3 years.  Why, because their claim is fraudulent.

Kritarch William Conley

But the real import is that decisions about what the reporter ignorantly calls visas, are in fact derivative asylum applications, not visas, are solely within the discretion of the Executive Branch, as recently reinforced by a Supreme Court decision.

The justices in the majority gave two separate reasons. Justice Antonin Scalia said the wife did not have a constitutional right to sue on behalf of her husband, who is not a U.S. citizen. She claims this "deprived her of her constitutional right to live in the United States with her spouse. There is no such constitutional right," he said. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Clarence Thomas agreed.
Taking a narrower approach, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy said the wife may have such a right, but officials had given her a sufficient reason for barring her husband. The government  "satisfied due process when it notified Din's husband his visa was denied under the immigration's statute's terrorism bar," he wrote. Justice Samuel Alito agreed, making a majority.
[Fremont Woman Loses Supreme Court Appeal To Get Visa For Afghan Husband, by David Savage, LAT, June 15, 2015]

The Supreme Court has clearly, and repeatedly, spoken on the issue, but lower level kritarchs are ignoring those decisions, including the recent decision in the Arizona Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act decision:

The Federal Government's broad, undoubted power over immigration and alien status rests, in part, on its constitutional power to "establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization," Art. I, §8, cl. 4, and on its inherent sovereign power to control and conduct foreign relations.
[Arizona v. United States, FindLaw, June 25, 2012] 

In defiance of an abundantly clear Supreme Court, kritarchs are creating a dictatorship and most likely doing so because of the death of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Scalia.  President Trump will have a hard row to hoe now, especially because the Legislative Branch, led by Paul Ryan, will not impeach these kritarchs.  We are at a crossroads, dictatorship looms.  Who will do what to whom?

Friday, March 10, 2017

Leftist Media And Democrats Prove Trump Can Be Intimidated

President Donald J. Trump appears to be going from strength to weakness.  After a strong State of the Union speech and fighting back against the Obama Regime wiretapping his residence, campaign staff, and former associates, the Democrats and their co-conspirators in the media have scored a victory in their fight against deporting illegal aliens.  A full-court press by the media and Democrats resulted in the release of notorious lesbian illegal alien Daniela Vargas.

Daniela Vargas, Illegal Alien And Lesbian

First the campaign and an article by a so-called reporter who appeared to be a transcriptionist for the campaign to free Vargas:

JACKSON — As Daniela Vargas sits in an immigrant detention center in Jena, La., 166 miles from her Jackson home, concerned citizens, advocates and pastors gathered here in the courtyard of Fondren Presbyterian Church to hold a vigil for the 22-year-old undocumented immigrant. Immigration officials detained her last week after she spoke out at a press conference, two weeks after they took her father and brother from their west Jackson home.
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement officials announced last week that she would not be eligible for a hearing before an immigration judge. Vargas had applied for Deferred Action on Childhood Arrival status, referred to as DACA, at the time of her detainment.
[Petitions, Vigil Demand Feds to #FreeDany from ICE Detention Center, by Arielle Dreher, Jacksonville Free Press, March 7, 2017]

Dreher even refers to her as a citizen without correction or comment:

Elmore told the vigil last night that Vargas had a good argument for "prejudice" in court. "This young lady has spent 15 years building a ... record as a good solid citizen, and you want to send her somewhere where those achievements mean little to nothing. Now that is what you call prejudice," Elmore said Monday night, referring to her legal standing.

And apparently education neither exists or is appreciated in Argentina.  An interesting claim ignored, again, by the transcriptionist.  You can contact Dreher here.

And, unfortunately, the pressure on President Trump worked:

A 22-year-old undocumented immigrant who was detained by the authorities last week after speaking out about her deportation fears was released on Friday, her lawyers and rights groups said.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials said that the woman, Daniela Vargas, would be freed under an order of supervision, although it did not disclose the terms of the order, according to a statement from the Elmore and Peterson law firm, which is representing Ms. Vargas. The officials, the statement said, also did not disclose why her release from a detention center in Jena, La., was being ordered now.
[Woman Detained After Speaking About Deportation Fears Is Released, by Christine Hauser, NYT, March 10, 2017]

Vargas entered the United States on the Visa Waiver Program.  This allows certain aliens to enter without a visa, but they do not have the right to contest their entry or a deportation.  Those are some of the conditions that Congress set on the program.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), the component of the Department of Homeland Security that arrested Vargas, as well as her criminal alien brother, and father, but not her mother living in a different State, had the opportunity to removal all three immediately to Argentina.  There was no reason for her not to be deported within the ten days she was held in custody.  There are multiple direct flights, and more with layovers, to Argentina. The only delay could have been obtaining a passport for her, though if it wanted to, as the Vargas family arrived by airline, ICE ERO could have prepared a travel document for her as provided by an international agreement where travelers by air who are deported can be sent back with only an official letter from the receiving country attesting to the identity and nationality of the deportee.

It appears that Vargas refused to sign a passport application, no passport was found during the search of her home, or someone in ICE ERO failed to take the initiative to produce a travel letter for her.

But worse yet, it appears that Steve Bannon may have been behind her release.

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration doesn’t want to talk about it.
When asked about the Obama-era program that allowed undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children to remain in the country and work, press secretary Sean Spicer has repeatedly demurred. Instead, he’s talked about the administration’s enforcement priorities.
When deputy press secretary Sarah Sanders is asked about Donald Trump’s private remarks that these so-called DREAMers shouldn’t worry about deportation, she says she doesn’t want to get ahead of the president.
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA — which Trump said he would rescind on day one — is rough political terrain for the White House. Conservative media and elected officials see it as a rare hardline immigration promise the administration hasn’t kept, and the White House is kicking it down the road for as long as officials can.
[Steve Bannon Helped Preserve DACA But Democrats And Activists Aren’t Celebrating, by Adrian Carrasquillo and Tarini Parti, BuzzFeed, March 9, 2017]

Despite that President Trump quite correctly called the Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and illegal and unconstitutional usurpation of the Constitution by Barack Hussein Obama, Bannon appears to be protecting the program.

But according to two sources who regularly speak with the Trump administration, DACA is a settled issue.
And in recent conversations, two administration sources pointed to chief strategist Steve Bannon as the man who preserved the current iteration of DACA, the victor of a debate with Attorney General Jeff Sessions and senior policy adviser Stephen Miller, who favored curtailing the program.
“Bannon usually wins most battles,” an administration insider said.

And this release of Vargas is not the first time someone in the Trump Administration has reached down to ICE ERO and ordered certain aliens not to be deported, including criminal aliens.  It appears press campaigns and threats can intimidate someone in the White House or at ICE ERO.

For many years, Ravi Ragbir has been working toward the realization of immigrant rights as the director of the New Sanctuary Coalition, an interfaith religious organization that opposes deportation. For all those years, Ragbir's own immigration case, which has been winding its way through the system in fits and starts, has been hanging over his head. 
Now, President Donald Trump is dramatically expanding U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's deportation priorities — and, since the government isn't legally bound to honor his deportation deferment, Ragbir seemed like a likely target.
So when Ragbir had to show up for his biannual check-in with ICE, fellow immigrant rights activists made sure he didn't show up alone.
"We are all Ravi!" chanted a crowd of hundreds of supporters, lead by a group of faith leaders, community organizers and politicians — including New York City Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito.
[This Immigrant Was Told To Check In With ICE — So He Brought Hundreds Of People With Him, by Andrew Joyce, .Mic, March 9, 2017]

And he's a illegal alien felon:

In 2001, though, Ragbir was convicted of wire-fraud while working as a loan-processor for a mortgage lender. According to Gothamist, Ragbir maintains that he was simply a low-level employee following the bank's own rules.

And the huge crowd was an implicit threat of violence, something that is becoming more common:

In the end a visibly shaken Ragbir exited the building with mixed news for the crowd. Immigration officials released Ragbir but, despite the fact that he had complied with his biannual check in and had a deferment that lasted until 2018, the activist was told to return to the ICE office next month.
"I have a sense, my friends, the reason Ravi is standing here is because all of you are here," New York State Senator Gustavo Rivera said, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with a teary-eyed Ragbir.
On April 11, Ragbir will have to return to the ICE office. The politicians, faith leaders and activists that accompanied him on Tuesday will be back, too. 

Criminal Illegal Alien Ravi Ragbir, Intimidating Secretary John Kelly?

So, will ICE ERO be prepared for the violence, or will someone in ICE ERO, or Steve Bannon, cave in the face of threats of violence that are becoming more successful day by day?

I have warned that street violence is the next step by the left in their war on immigration law enforcement and that DHS and its enforcement components are woefully ill-prepared for street thuggery and violence. [In The Streets And The Courts, The Left Plans A Coup. But Trump Can Fight Back, by Federale, VDare, February 14, 2017, and The Plan: Obstruction, Violence, and Foreign Interference, by FederaleFederale Blog, February 12, 2017]

It is disturbing that the Trump Administration at some level, either allowing weak-kneed mid-level bureaucrats at ICE ERO, Secretary Kelly, or Steven Bannon to be so easily intimidated by the press and leftist protest groups.  It does not bode well for immigration patriots.

Wednesday, March 8, 2017

Kritarchs And The DACA Menace

The threat of the Kritarchs and the menace of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program are coming to a head. Not just because of the terrorist threats from DACA recipient Astrid Silva but also from the hostility of DACA recipients to President Trump, such as Jasmine Lomeli and Raymond Partolan.  The Treason Bar is continuing it's challenge not to DACA as a policy, but to it's temporary nature.  The strategy is to claim that DACA is a regular immigration benefit that cannot be taken away without review not by the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), the immigration courts, but are subject to review by Article III courts, e.g. the regular Federal courts. This writer warned about this a month ago [Warning For President Trump: Kritarchs Looking To Impose DACA, by Federale, VDare, February 16, 2017].  A month that President Trump, Secretary Kelly, and Attorney General Sessions should have used to end the DACA program.  By not doing so, they risk making DACA a permanent amnesty program for illegal aliens.

Back in the news are the Treason Bar attorneys for Mexican gangbanger and DACA recipient, Daniel Ramirez Medina.

La Paisas or La Paizas Gangbanger Daniel Ramirez Medina

Daniel Ramirez Medina's Gang Tattoo

Attorneys for a Mexican immigrant in Seattle, who has permission to work in the United States, are hoping to convince a federal judge to hear a challenge to his immigration arrest and bypass U.S. immigration courts.
If they are successful on Wednesday, the case of Daniel Ramirez Medina, a so-called dreamer afforded some protection from deportation under an Obama-era program, could point a new way forward for thousands of people across the country threatened by stepped-up immigration enforcement under President Donald Trump.
Under U.S. law, deportation cases must be heard by immigration courts but Ramirez hopes to establish an alternate legal challenge over his arrest. Immigration courts, which operate separately from the broader federal judiciary, have a huge backlog and immigration lawyers say it is difficult to win deportation challenges in them.
[Arrested Mexican 'Dreamer' Immigrant Seeks New U.S. Legal Channel, by Dan Levine, Reuters, March 7, 2017]

The essence of the argument by the Treason Bar is that DACA is a permanent benefit for aliens granting legal status in the United States and cannot be taken away by the President.

The Department of Justice Office of the Legal Counsel stated unequivocally that the DACA program was only a deferral of a deportation and did not grant recipients any legal status.

As has historically been true of deferred action, these proposed deferred action programs would not “legalize” any aliens who are unlawfully present in the United States: Deferred action does not confer any lawful immigration status, nor does it provide a path to obtaining permanent residence or citizenship. 
[Memorandum Opinion For The Secretary Of Homeland Security And The Counsel To The President, by Karl R. Thompson, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, Department of Justice, November 19, 2014]

The Treason Bar insists though that Medina is legally in the United States.

“We think the due process clause of the constitution says you can’t do that to people—especially when government has given them that lawful presence in the United States,” counted Ramirez attorney Theodore Boutrous.
[Ruling On Seattle 'Dreamer's' Release Expected Next Week, KING 5, March 8, 2017]

And the Treason Bar wants U.S. Magistrate Judge James Donohue to go full Kritarch and declare DACA a new immigration program, a program created by the Executive Branch, and not by the Legislative Branch, which in Article I, Section 8, is given the power over immigration.

In addition to release, his legal team is also seeking “declaratory relief,” to provide clarity on the due process rights of DACA recipients.
“We’re saying to a federal judge: issue a statement that DACA provides certain protections for your liberties. That becomes a statement of a federal court and what the executive has to pay attention, so we don’t have to count on the good will of ICE agents,” said attorney Mark Rosenbaum.

The Treason Bar wants power over immigration taken from the Congress and given to the courts, so as to achieve the end result it wants.  Note that previously the Treason Bar claimed that the President had authority over immigration because it was related to relations with other countries.

The Federal Government's broad, undoubted power over immigration and alien status rests, in part, on its constitutional power to "establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization," Art. I, §8, cl. 4, and on its inherent sovereign power to control and conduct foreign relations.
[Arizona v. United States, FindLaw, June 25, 2012] 

It is clear that the Constitution means nothing to the Treason Bar, it is only the particular policy that they are interested in.  And for the Treason Bar, the Constitution's only meaning is what the Treason Bar says it is for the moment.  In order to protect illegal aliens, the Treason Bar finds it necessary to destroy the Constitution.  This is not a living Constitution, but a mangled Constitution, tortured to mean anything the Treason Bar thinks at the moment.

This is what President Trump is up against.  The Constitution means nothing other than Moar Immigration!  We have seen this in the usurpation by Barack Obama of the authority of Congress to make law regarding immigration and the usurpation of the legislative grant of power to the President to bar any alien or groups of aliens by another judge in the State of Washington and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the travel ban for citizens of seven nations.  This time the Treason Bar is tempting the Kritarchs with visions of seizing power over immigration law and imposing a permanent amnesty program for illegal aliens.  Such a usurpation of the authority of Congress is no more legitimate than the original DACA program created not by legislation but by executive order.

President Trump must strike quickly by abolishing DACA immediately.